2909 pts ยท February 14, 2015
Thanks for the info
Thanks for the info.
Damn... As my American friends would put it. You're a special kind of stupid ain't cha
Order of the British Empire. Knighthood/Damehood.
Wouldn't that be a paradise. Close the border to the south and just never speak of it again.
https://media3.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWE1NzM3M2U1YmxxZXdmN3V6d2x4ajNoemlxOHlnbGZxMnJ0ZGl6Z293NzMzMDJ0cCZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/DfLwM9kttDFEQ/200w.webp
I have no doubt that you've said that.I've no problem with you I don't know you. You seem like a nice well reasoned person. Maybe I'm not. Maybe I'm just tired of watching innocent people pay for this destiny we can't seem to manifest. But the time for wait and see violence is past. The time to actively practice "a good offense is the best defense". That's now.
That's where I have problems with what you're saying.They're in no way sounding like the thing they're fighting against. It's not as if a bunch of ice agents are dead in the streets with protestors standing around innocently saying they killed eachother. They're standing together saying an attack on one of us is an attack on all of us. And we're not waiting for you to surprise murder us at home. We're out here on the streets. Let's square up.
Yeah. That wanted was supposed to be warned. But apparently I missed it.
But you did say that. Exactly. You cannot have it both ways. That's bootlicker behaviour. You can't be a pacifist until YOU are under attack. That's the point of the whole leopards eating faces meme. That's just you agreeing to accept brutality for others until it affects you personally and THEN getting indignant about it. Also. Nobody is saying "ambush them at hotels". We're saying we already wanted you. You didn't leave. Game on.
It's not the same in any way. "We" don't possess any means to elevate ourselves to the same position. I can't go on the street and kill ice agents and not get arrested. Luigi Mangione is a key example of that. However they can not only "get away with it" but they have the very people meant to help us supporting and defending the murder. So. The system villifies us either way and protects its own. Therefore your example does not track. Both sides aren't equal.
That was what I'm saying. But I don't think saying "right wingers" is inaccurate exactly. It's simply too broad a brush.I'd prefer personally to say.You're not a bad person because you're a nazi. You're a nazi because you're a bad person. Some people might be trash but there a whole cottage industry made furnishing homes from shit you found at the dump. Despite the fact that you might not be trash. You filled my house with trash now it stinks... because of you. Not you, but for example.
My dude. 1: I am on your side. I promise. 2: I didn't think you were defending anyone. 3: saying "you win. Good?". Stop please. I'm not trying to beat you or win anything. I really did want to just ask you. Does equivocating "one with many" in any way help or hurt future arguments. I say hurt. And I say if you do wrong/cause hurt you should be named. The fact that your part of a group is not particularly relevant to your culpability. The group being bad/evil is a real but separate issue.
The Venn diagram is alarming I'll give you that. Is it worth it to reduce 4 groups into "right wingers"? These particular ones notwithstanding, doesn't it close the door on any follow up rebuttal you could make as your opponent could say "not all right wingers..." And fundamentally they're right, as it's a matter of perspective and not fact. I suggest instead of lumping anyone in a group, name them. You shouldn't escape shame because you're one of many.
You have no laws in your country?
He's got a rag in his pocket... Bike-lane cleaner bike cleaner
This guy looks like he's cosplaying John Lithgow in Cliffhanger... Unfortunately
All these comments and not one "name checks out". That kinda mundane banality are such a cornerstone. Lol
You were so close to a different comeback. So close! If you could have just resisted last-word-itis and left of "hypocrite".. but you couldn't ,because that made you feel like you did a thing. But you didn't. You supported the argument they made but clearly not knowing what you're talking about. Or what the definition of hypocrite is. I certainly don't agree to a dog whistle to violence... But your nonsense makes the rest of us look stupid and uneducated. Sit down useless shit.
Big ass spider. My lips would have fell off too!
You hit it on sentence 2. It's a significant cost for an insurance package sold by the very people that tell you there's a billion to one shot you'll ever need it. It practically unsells itself. You're not wrong I'll admit. Figure it out. But still. Due to the gross misunderstanding generally speaking about how the Internet and cloud services work, it's not like it isn't accounted for. So to speak.
You had a love tragically taken. I can imagine the pain. I'm sorry. You've done amazing. The only comment you made about your kids is mega-positive. You did that. Maybe it's just time to rest. You've done enough. You're a success.
Right...!
Edit... Meant to say more than 80% not less... But. See what I mean .
That's only correct if, and I cannot stress this enough, capital I capital F, IF... The folks in your org have any idea what half of that shit means. Furthermore, your infra needs to be setup and means tested to ensure that the entire new hotness of advance threat protection is compatible with your infra... OH AND less than 80% of your workforce needs to be able to read and WILLING to trust and believe in it.So.. yeah. It's not bad practices so much as bad behaviour, and bad mgmt.
I know there's a grid overlayed but... How do you piss into the corners of an oval?
Definitely inspires awe... Awe shit we better take some steps for safety! Fuckin big ones and quickly!
Butter fingered myself. .... What's wrong with the Chinese? If the neighbour kids are bugging you, you need to deal with little Timmy... You don't have to "get rid of the Jones's" just little Timmy. And frankly that's a way easier bite to take than "all of China"... Also figuring out how to "deal\work with\sanction" the Chinese GOVERNMENT just sounds more humane than "get rid of"...
Thanks for the info
Thanks for the info.
Damn... As my American friends would put it. You're a special kind of stupid ain't cha
Order of the British Empire. Knighthood/Damehood.
Wouldn't that be a paradise. Close the border to the south and just never speak of it again.
https://media3.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWE1NzM3M2U1YmxxZXdmN3V6d2x4ajNoemlxOHlnbGZxMnJ0ZGl6Z293NzMzMDJ0cCZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/DfLwM9kttDFEQ/200w.webp
I have no doubt that you've said that.
I've no problem with you I don't know you. You seem like a nice well reasoned person. Maybe I'm not. Maybe I'm just tired of watching innocent people pay for this destiny we can't seem to manifest.
But the time for wait and see violence is past. The time to actively practice "a good offense is the best defense". That's now.
That's where I have problems with what you're saying.
They're in no way sounding like the thing they're fighting against.
It's not as if a bunch of ice agents are dead in the streets with protestors standing around innocently saying they killed eachother.
They're standing together saying an attack on one of us is an attack on all of us. And we're not waiting for you to surprise murder us at home. We're out here on the streets. Let's square up.
Yeah. That wanted was supposed to be warned. But apparently I missed it.
But you did say that. Exactly.
You cannot have it both ways. That's bootlicker behaviour. You can't be a pacifist until YOU are under attack. That's the point of the whole leopards eating faces meme. That's just you agreeing to accept brutality for others until it affects you personally and THEN getting indignant about it.
Also. Nobody is saying "ambush them at hotels". We're saying we already wanted you. You didn't leave. Game on.
It's not the same in any way.
"We" don't possess any means to elevate ourselves to the same position.
I can't go on the street and kill ice agents and not get arrested. Luigi Mangione is a key example of that.
However they can not only "get away with it" but they have the very people meant to help us supporting and defending the murder.
So. The system villifies us either way and protects its own. Therefore your example does not track. Both sides aren't equal.
That was what I'm saying. But I don't think saying "right wingers" is inaccurate exactly. It's simply too broad a brush.
I'd prefer personally to say.
You're not a bad person because you're a nazi. You're a nazi because you're a bad person.
Some people might be trash but there a whole cottage industry made furnishing homes from shit you found at the dump. Despite the fact that you might not be trash. You filled my house with trash now it stinks... because of you.
Not you, but for example.
My dude.
1: I am on your side. I promise.
2: I didn't think you were defending anyone.
3: saying "you win. Good?". Stop please. I'm not trying to beat you or win anything. I really did want to just ask you.
Does equivocating "one with many" in any way help or hurt future arguments.
I say hurt. And I say if you do wrong/cause hurt you should be named. The fact that your part of a group is not particularly relevant to your culpability. The group being bad/evil is a real but separate issue.
The Venn diagram is alarming I'll give you that.
Is it worth it to reduce 4 groups into "right wingers"? These particular ones notwithstanding, doesn't it close the door on any follow up rebuttal you could make as your opponent could say "not all right wingers..." And fundamentally they're right, as it's a matter of perspective and not fact.
I suggest instead of lumping anyone in a group, name them. You shouldn't escape shame because you're one of many.
You have no laws in your country?
He's got a rag in his pocket... Bike-lane cleaner bike cleaner
This guy looks like he's cosplaying John Lithgow in Cliffhanger... Unfortunately
All these comments and not one "name checks out". That kinda mundane banality are such a cornerstone. Lol
You were so close to a different comeback. So close! If you could have just resisted last-word-itis and left of "hypocrite".. but you couldn't ,because that made you feel like you did a thing. But you didn't. You supported the argument they made but clearly not knowing what you're talking about. Or what the definition of hypocrite is. I certainly don't agree to a dog whistle to violence... But your nonsense makes the rest of us look stupid and uneducated. Sit down useless shit.
Big ass spider. My lips would have fell off too!
You hit it on sentence 2. It's a significant cost for an insurance package sold by the very people that tell you there's a billion to one shot you'll ever need it. It practically unsells itself. You're not wrong I'll admit. Figure it out. But still. Due to the gross misunderstanding generally speaking about how the Internet and cloud services work, it's not like it isn't accounted for. So to speak.
You had a love tragically taken. I can imagine the pain. I'm sorry. You've done amazing. The only comment you made about your kids is mega-positive. You did that. Maybe it's just time to rest. You've done enough. You're a success.
Right...!
Edit... Meant to say more than 80% not less... But. See what I mean .
That's only correct if, and I cannot stress this enough, capital I capital F, IF... The folks in your org have any idea what half of that shit means. Furthermore, your infra needs to be setup and means tested to ensure that the entire new hotness of advance threat protection is compatible with your infra... OH AND less than 80% of your workforce needs to be able to read and WILLING to trust and believe in it.
So.. yeah. It's not bad practices so much as bad behaviour, and bad mgmt.
I know there's a grid overlayed but... How do you piss into the corners of an oval?
Definitely inspires awe... Awe shit we better take some steps for safety! Fuckin big ones and quickly!
Butter fingered myself. .... What's wrong with the Chinese? If the neighbour kids are bugging you, you need to deal with little Timmy... You don't have to "get rid of the Jones's" just little Timmy. And frankly that's a way easier bite to take than "all of China"... Also figuring out how to "deal\work with\sanction" the Chinese GOVERNMENT just sounds more humane than "get rid of"...