-183 pts ยท January 31, 2017
Actually, Harry could not die except by the hand of He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named. So, if she actually cast that spell, dead she would be.
Job participation rate is about 62%. Unemployment rate at 4.8%. Jobs don't looked to be taken, more like abandoned. More work, less posting.
Its hard to trust a group of people when they will not actively denounce as a whole, others who uses their faith to commit murders.
Just remember that if you ever get sick eating it there. No belly aching about how they did you wrong...
I agree. I like my steak ran through a warm room. I just dont know if I trust a restaurant to do it...
If it bother her that much, she should have just resign in protest. She is a attorney, not a judge. Not her job to determine legality.
She only got fired after she tried to sabotage a legally signed policy by circumventing it. It is not her job to make that determination.
Would you sue the condom manufacturer if you use a condom that was purposely sabotage by your partner and got pregnant?
Question. Why should they when it wasnt McD or their rep that spilled the coffee?
http://www.collinsandlacy.com/defending-the-coffee-burn-suit/
Po-tay-toe, Po-tah-toe. What one person consider hot, another tepid. No FDA guideline. Just what each state consider Industry Standard.
I know this is old but - http://articles.latimes.com/1998/feb/18/food/fo-20193 Personally, if I was a small operator, I wouldnt serve it.
Personally, I think we should have reciprocal immigration policy base in the illegal person country. We do to you what your country would do
According to the snowflakes, it's inhuman to eat fresh foods. It has to be petted, calmed, and cuddle first. Then it has to be processed.
It wasnt about fact. It was about skewing of the fact. People wanted "hot coffee" and everyone was serving "hot coffee".
Who spilled it on her? Was it McD? Read this and get back to me - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald's_Restaurants (1/2)
Personally, I like my steak ran through a warm room but never would I serve it to someone who paid me to cook it. People are too sue happy.
Any and all of those. Her job again, is to implement policy. Not make them. If she cant, she needs to quit/resign.
If she thought it was illegal, she should have quit. Not do an end run on those that made the policy. Again, not her job to make policy.
She does not get to decide which policy is illegal and which is not. It is not her job. She is tasked with implementing policy.
Really? http://www.pritzkerlaw.com/ecoli/e-coli-lawsuit-5-reasons-to-sue/ecoli-from-steak/ They dont think so...
The way you worded it, yes. The way I worded it, no. If you are going to quote someone, use the whole quote correctly.
The AG is appointed by the President and serve at the President whim. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Attorney_General
Chinese carryout is not Chinese cooking. No "Chinese" restaurant in the US is Chinese. None.
No respectable restaurant will serve raw steak. Anyone can sue and win in the United States. FDA, internal temp = 145, or no go.
Remember McD getting sued for spilled hot coffee? Well, MR is 145. FDA guideline is 145. Do you want to get sue? So, in a way, yes, illegal.
Does not excuse her from doing her job while she held the job.
You respect someone who, instead of resigning in protest, decide to not do their job? Really? Never own a business or was a supervisor? smh
So, we should always take advantage of the job that we are leaving and voice our grievance to the world just because we want to be heard?
Courage? You mean stupidity. She cannot be trusted. She should have quit with a statement of why, instead of a sucker punching.
Actually, Harry could not die except by the hand of He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named. So, if she actually cast that spell, dead she would be.
Job participation rate is about 62%. Unemployment rate at 4.8%. Jobs don't looked to be taken, more like abandoned. More work, less posting.
Its hard to trust a group of people when they will not actively denounce as a whole, others who uses their faith to commit murders.
Just remember that if you ever get sick eating it there. No belly aching about how they did you wrong...
I agree. I like my steak ran through a warm room. I just dont know if I trust a restaurant to do it...
If it bother her that much, she should have just resign in protest. She is a attorney, not a judge. Not her job to determine legality.
She only got fired after she tried to sabotage a legally signed policy by circumventing it. It is not her job to make that determination.
Would you sue the condom manufacturer if you use a condom that was purposely sabotage by your partner and got pregnant?
Question. Why should they when it wasnt McD or their rep that spilled the coffee?
http://www.collinsandlacy.com/defending-the-coffee-burn-suit/
Po-tay-toe, Po-tah-toe. What one person consider hot, another tepid. No FDA guideline. Just what each state consider Industry Standard.
I know this is old but - http://articles.latimes.com/1998/feb/18/food/fo-20193 Personally, if I was a small operator, I wouldnt serve it.
Personally, I think we should have reciprocal immigration policy base in the illegal person country. We do to you what your country would do
According to the snowflakes, it's inhuman to eat fresh foods. It has to be petted, calmed, and cuddle first. Then it has to be processed.
It wasnt about fact. It was about skewing of the fact. People wanted "hot coffee" and everyone was serving "hot coffee".
Who spilled it on her? Was it McD? Read this and get back to me - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald's_Restaurants (1/2)
Personally, I like my steak ran through a warm room but never would I serve it to someone who paid me to cook it. People are too sue happy.
Any and all of those. Her job again, is to implement policy. Not make them. If she cant, she needs to quit/resign.
If she thought it was illegal, she should have quit. Not do an end run on those that made the policy. Again, not her job to make policy.
She does not get to decide which policy is illegal and which is not. It is not her job. She is tasked with implementing policy.
Really? http://www.pritzkerlaw.com/ecoli/e-coli-lawsuit-5-reasons-to-sue/ecoli-from-steak/ They dont think so...
The way you worded it, yes. The way I worded it, no. If you are going to quote someone, use the whole quote correctly.
The AG is appointed by the President and serve at the President whim. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Attorney_General
Chinese carryout is not Chinese cooking. No "Chinese" restaurant in the US is Chinese. None.
No respectable restaurant will serve raw steak. Anyone can sue and win in the United States. FDA, internal temp = 145, or no go.
Remember McD getting sued for spilled hot coffee? Well, MR is 145. FDA guideline is 145. Do you want to get sue? So, in a way, yes, illegal.
Does not excuse her from doing her job while she held the job.
You respect someone who, instead of resigning in protest, decide to not do their job? Really? Never own a business or was a supervisor? smh
So, we should always take advantage of the job that we are leaving and voice our grievance to the world just because we want to be heard?
Courage? You mean stupidity. She cannot be trusted. She should have quit with a statement of why, instead of a sucker punching.