Interesting theory

Jan 21, 2017 1:01 PM

ChewyVuitton

Views

115173

Likes

2989

Dislikes

1259

I sometimes love imgur.

this post is really dumb

9 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 23

Just buy 2 sodas. >__>

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Everyone disliked Hilary (myself included), but more people voted for her (myself included)

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It's like Alex Hirsch said, comparing her to Trump. "There's a difference between a flawed candidate, and the enemy."

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

So what this guy is saying is that the people who voted for trump were so triggered that they couldn't keep their emotional response in

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

check and reacted as stupidly as this? Not seeing a whole lot of difference between them and the people he's complaining about.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Most of this BS. First of criticizing someone is one thing being racist is another. This is another person trying to blame the liberals.

9 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 19

Nah, not particularly. This is the old conservative, "liberals are out of touch" mantra.

9 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 13

which is, ironically, woefully out of touch

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Actually this is true. It happened because republicans are successfully defining liberals as an enemy worse than Putin.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I thought it was just a natural cycle of 8 years dem, 8 year GOP->8 years Dem->? years GOP

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 5

Shhhh! Don't spoil it. We've got a good thing going here.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Its a pendulum, same reactionary bullshit, just with different triggeres. Goes back forth on who's peddling it every few years

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Same old 2 party system controlling the government.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Yes but I think they're addressing why Trump over any of the other Republican candidates

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sure, but that's a primaries problem. The 8 years is actually vulnerable because he can lose the seat after 4.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

i'm just clarifying what the meaning looks to be.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This sounds WAAAAY too much like the last season of south park.

9 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 7

It's almost as if South Park is satire & political commentary or something, idk

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

And sounds British.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 11

Okay assholes, which part of "rubbished their parenting skills, took the piss out of their beliefs" isn't British?!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

It really doesn't.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Haha, apart from that person being more of a twat than most. We don't call it "soda" that's so yank.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

The only liberal I've met that's done any of these things was a brony on the internet that thinks he's a Trotsky communist.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

>TROTsky I see what he did there

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

As long as we keep shoveling shit at each other, we're going to have a bad taste in our mouths.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 4

This

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Turn back, there's nothing good down here

9 years ago | Likes 422 Dislikes 19

Ok

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thanks son. Good day.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're right ... you're right. Off I go, thanks.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It all floats down here! http://imgur.com/mlowrej

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Looking out for us comment scroungers.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

But there is this. Well worth my scrolling.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Thanks

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I love this comment. Love it.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thanks fam

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Top and accurate comment right here

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I should've listened.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"People don't like being treated like shit".. so this includes gay people that want to marry, Muslims, etc too right?

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 6

"No i said 'people', scary minority groups don't count" -this asshole, internally

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

What does he mean by eco-pieties?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It does feel like the divide between people is only going to get bigger. The country wont achieve anything unless its united.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

I commented on here saying the same thing. This dude is just playing victim pointing fingers and creating a bigger rift in the divide.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Correcting attitudes instead of finding them jobs? You realise that the unemployment rate was cut in half the last 8 years right?

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Who is this You this author keeps talking about?

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Ugh not this again. Don't reduce a complex, two year long sequence of events involving billions of dollars and hundreds of millions of 1/

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 9

people down to "backlash against SJWs". That's right SJWs, it's all your fault! Nevermind that only 54.4% of eligible voters turned out, 2/

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

or that Trump actually lost the popular vote, or that voters in some swing states too busy being desperately afraid of real problems to 3/

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

even be aware of this crap, or that large segments of the US population are woefully uninformed and still think that Barack Obama is a 4/

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

Kenyan Muslim and Iraq was behind 9/11. Nope, it's all those nasty SJWs fault. 5/5

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

What I'm reading is "People demanded equal treatment, denounced racism and bigotry, and because we fit the bill we're upset at being called>

9 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 24

Can't believe I had to scroll that low to find this

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

>what we are. Clearly us voting for Trump is YOUR fault because we wanted to keep on being assholes in bubbles." That's not how it works.

9 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 17

The idea that people living in cities, multi-cultural and informations hubs, are in bubbles is laughable

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Racist bigots who are for the first time experiencing what it's like on the other side live in bubbles.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Agreed. The lack of understanding is frankly rather pitiful, but they seem to simply lash out instead of understand how ignorant they are.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yup playing the "victim" is a real adult move. Just sayin being a white Republican Christian you are hardly the victim. But you do have to

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Be responsible for your actions. And if your actions are saying "God hates fags" well you get safe spaces and public movement.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

I just love the irony in "You treated us like shit THIS IS WHAT YOU GET". That 'treatment' is a response to being treated like shit.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Yeah, exactly.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

To be honest, if you're against gay marriage, you kinda are homophobic. That one's fair.

9 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 11

There are a lot of them that are very fair. People that voted trump dont care for decency.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

What if your religion says homosexuality is bad and your against it based on the tenets of your faith?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Then fuck your religion

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Keep in mind, the Bible condemns shrimp-eaters to eternal damnation twice as many times as gay people

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then you don't have to be a homosexual, but they can. The practice clause of the first amendment, free to practice as long as it doesn't

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

That's another topic. IMO just because your against gay marriage as part of your religion doesn't make you homophobic automatically.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Infringe on anyone else's freedom

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Then you better follow to the T every stupid other rule in your religion.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If you follow a religion that kind of the point right. Based on the religion, But thanks for playing.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No it's not. Eating shellfish is just a big abomination as being gay. But nobody is preventing you from going to red lobster.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No it's not. Eating shellfish is just a big abomination as being gay. But nobody is preventing you from going to red lobster.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A friend did an article for News Week covering multiple counties across PA consisting of mainly white folks, that all voted Obama.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

These same people decided to vote Trump because they felt their problems were no longer a concern with the Dem party. Each county saw

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

Unemployment rise, wages go stagnant. They won PA for Obama and decided to go another way. They weren't racist, or sexist. Just regular folk

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 3, 2017 5:21 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

These are the same racists that voted for Obama twice right?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 3, 2017 5:21 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Great read actually

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Link? Thoughtful commentary is so much better to delve into than half the shit that's thrown out.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Sorry about not following up. It'll be easier to link it when I'm not on mobile. I'll get you this week.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*Deep inhale*: You believe that people should have a right to choose an unhealthy super sized soda, but if they choose to love their (c)

9 years ago | Likes 404 Dislikes 74

I can't help but upvote both this and op. you both have excellent points.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Are you runnning next time, you should

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

My friend, you cannot argue with over-generalizations.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Well said.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

God bless you

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

please vote this higher

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 10

.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

same gender you're entitled to stand up against it. You assume the solution to immigration isn't reform, but to build a massive wall (c)

9 years ago | Likes 342 Dislikes 53

to shut yourselves in. You want to find people jobs, but you believe capitalism is the sacred way while ignoring it's simply much (c)

9 years ago | Likes 357 Dislikes 48

more beneficial for employers to outsource jobs, pay less, and replace labor with machines. Because you were so ingrained with standing (c)

9 years ago | Likes 350 Dislikes 45

against your previous president that it's genuinely laughable you're upset people are standing against this one. Because you use Caitlyn (c)

9 years ago | Likes 356 Dislikes 42

Jenner as the face of transgenders more than the left ever has or ever will. Because you say your beliefs are being pissed on when at the(c)

9 years ago | Likes 345 Dislikes 43

Sorry but if you're against gay marriage, then what are you if not homophobic? There's LITERALLY no other reason.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

This is so stupid. Blaming Trump's victory on a generalized small SJW minority is retarded and way too simplified. What an idiot.

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 14

Scapegoat, they realized what kind of idiot trump is AFTER voting for him and they don't have the decency to accept responsibility

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Did we ban paragraphs?

9 years ago | Likes 883 Dislikes 57

Not yet

9 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 3

Goddamn liberals

9 years ago | Likes 110 Dislikes 1

based on the text limit on imgur i would say yes they did ban them

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Kind of the original point. Ignore the message. Denigrate the messenger.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Do you want Trump? Cos that's how you get Trump.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

brilliant

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Typical response from da left. Din't have nuttin. Go Afta da grammur

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Monday

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is actually funny

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can't now

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, yes you did. Now you are sorry, you Trump-maker you.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

#ThanksTrump

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

#damnitdonald

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Oh that's WAY better!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You didn't get the memo?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I did, but it was one long paragraph so I didn't register most of it...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hadn't gotten para-shamed yet

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh look, more people taking obnoxious fringe ideals and acting like they were what was front and center of the liberal agenda.

9 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 28

Fox news in a nut shell.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Actually it was.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

Not to mention 1/3 were from Conservatives and another 1/3 are just plain stupid.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 22, 2017 12:41 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Why should he? He's not wrong, most of what the right got up in arms about was pretending tiny fringe groups were the majority.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"Liberals always silence opinions!" "Hey this is the extreme left" "SHUT UP YOU LIBERAL"

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 7

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 24, 2017 5:18 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Something that Bernie himself begged them not to do. Cutting of their nose to spite their face.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a Bernie supporter, that's extremely childish and no better than an extremist right/leftist reason for voting either way

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And Dems thought specific groups would automatically vote for them. I know gay people who voted trump.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I know but they're downvoting me BC they're angry about the truth.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I, too, know stupid people. Gay people can be stupid too.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a liberal, this is what I've been telling people for years. Quit being so damn judgmental and pushy with rules and such. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 194 Dislikes 56

As a middle age white male... it is an insult. I live in Nebraska and the majority of white males mirror the stereo type.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I've been saying for years there's going to be a backlash for "make a public apology or you're fired" for personal actions/opinions/tweets.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

People were fired from their jobs for saying (what I must type as "the N-word" or get banned) 20 years earlier & for private conversations

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Anthony Cumia (straight white man) was hit by a black woman for taking pictures (not of her), rants on Twitter, fired via email over weekend

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's exactly what my kids say.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Blue Collar working class. Look there are facts, there is more going on beneath the surface and i apologize but this post is shallow

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

As a liberal you need to stop trying to please people who are walking all over you and grow some balls.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And i do not apologize for the constant, out of order replies... im really sick of post that do not understand the bigger picture...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

We are winning "hearts and minds". So either Civil War or GOP gets old and dies... only two futures I see.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

whereas calling ppl libtards,closing abortion clinics and frisk and stop laws are a continuation of the free spirit of the american frontier

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 16

This election was lost due to Electrol College rigging that started a decade plus in the past. GOP is beating us in a technical game....

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

Gerrymandering is one of the GOPs best secret weapons. The way the districts are shaped is completely laughable and inexplicable

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

The Dems gerrymander when they're in power.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yeah, but the republicans have way more power on the state and local levels where those changes happen, and that allows them to do it more.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

It's hardly even fair for me to blame them for winning by doing something that is legal. redistricting needs to be redone across the board.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Will your next arguement be that we need to give Trickle Down Economics a chance? Cause yea, we tired that and it destroyed the...

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 24, 2017 5:19 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Stop copy- pasting this in every fucking thread. Nobody stole the nomination from Bernie, Clinton had more support, simple as that. You 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Voted for a liar. You voted for someone that has promised to easily fix every problem in the US, and when he doesn't do what he promised 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You will defend him and blame the democrats. Or you will defend the fact that you voted for him by blaming the dnc for "rigging" bernies 1/4

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Nomination

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I voted Libertarian BC I vote my consciousness. It's you Republocrats who vote party lines and attack anyone telling you the Truth.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn't vote for anyone (I'm from Norway) but I am sick of people defending Trump and reflecting every wrong about him on to someone else.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People are different, and that is okay. Focus more on what we have in common and politely debate our differences. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 116 Dislikes 19

As a liberal, I disagree. There are basic, yet fundamental, differences between the two parties that make compromise/communication impossibl

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 14

You're the problem.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Nobody wants to debate anymore. On EITHER side. They just want to scream they're right and shut themselves off from more info.

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 5

I don't know why it's so hard to find people like that. It's like they have to hats you because your opinion is different

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Now Libertarians are conservatives that a Liberal could have a debate on how to solve problems. GOP has to die off and...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

You need to learn about the last 40 years of politics to fully understand where we are... and how bad this could easily be.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Your so right but remember Mark Twain, it's easier to fool a man then convince him his been Fooled.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Now what if, hear me out here, I fool a man into thinking he's being fooled!?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I used to qualify myself as libertarian for this reason until I found out the movement had been co-opted by theocrats. But yeah, you right.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Same here.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Just remember that clinton lost the election because of something like 10.000 votes. So maybe don't put to much in to theese teories, 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

2/2 since you know she did get more than 2 million more votes than Trump. Voter ID laws probably played a much bigger role than

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

3/3 "Ohh no I can't smoke in parks"

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Are we not gonna mention the outdated electoral college system? Because I'm pretty sure that's the biggest issue here.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

It is, but that can pretty much only be changed if indidual states choses to pledged EC mandates according to national majority

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To be fair, being against gay marriage IS homophobic

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 32

That thought right there is an example of the problem. You think you know the reason, without actually knowing it.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

Technically no. Being afraid of gay people for no reason is homophobic. Not wanting to allow them to get married is just being a dick.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 10

Or maybe it's because you're opposed to people receiving tax breaks for no reason. The married get breaks because of children 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Which are a benefit to society. Personally I'd just push government out of marriage and make tax breaks about producing children. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Homophobic has evolved past a meaning of fear.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or maybe you oppose it for religious reasons. Religion is important to people.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

You mean homophobic religions?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What do you mean by that?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That may be so but religion has no right to be in the same place as politics.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Then politics has no right to dictate religious beliefs, agreed?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

i mean, there is no non homophobic argument against gay marriage.9

9 years ago | Likes 318 Dislikes 65

Marriage is literally a religious thing done by private institutions, the gov only uses it for tax shit. Civil unions should be equal to

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Thank you.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 10

There isn't. There are people who cant handle that they are shitty so they come up with bullshit answers.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Ah sweet i was ready to scroll all the way down to see this opinion at like -3, glad it's not

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

What about that it should be separate from the church and should be the legal function of a civil union; In no way connected to the church

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10th amendment

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Call me crazy, but isn't marriage literally meant to be defined be a religious ceremony? How is that hateful to want it to be what it is?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

For the record, this applies to more than just gay people, and marriage shouldn't be a political status, so non-religious people can opt out

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah I agree with a lot of the points in the post, but this one caught my eye for that reason

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the religious argument has so many holes in it. if religion says to do that, why don't they go to church on saturday like the bible says?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

a lot of inconsistencies with what the religion says to do. and what people pick and chose to follow.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well that's just fake

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

False*

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There should be a different term in regards to recognition from government for ALL marriage. Marriage shouldn't be defined by the government

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Like: marriage is a religious act, no? What happened to separation of church and state and all that

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well, there are. I don't agree with this, but marriage benefits are specifically designed to incentivize having a child in what the

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

majority of people believe to be a stable relationship with a typical "breadwinner" and a "caregiver". Adoption aside, why give those

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 10

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 21, 2017 9:18 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

So infertile couples and those that choose not to have kids don't deserve marriage benefits. Got it.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Oh come on, you're smarter than than. Just because an idea is carried out in a homophobic way doesn't mean the idea itself is homophobic.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

benefits to a couple that can't have children? Yes I'm aware that adoption is a thing, but you asked about non homophobic arguments.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 9

Those same non-homophobes would never in a million years argue that a sterile or aged straight couple shouldn't be able to marry.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Because having a child isn't mandatory when you get married. And this is just grasping at straws to not sound homophobic.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Not grasping at straws, the idea itself is not homophobic. They way that idea is carried out often is. There's a difference

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

Marriage in the eyes of the gov and a private entity (church) should be able to choose who it performs ceremonies for Personal liberties etc

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

For real. This post is just playing victim. It's a bit annoying.

9 years ago | Likes 154 Dislikes 27

You mean they're doing exactly what they accuse the left wing of? ;)

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

"It's your fault I voted for Trump! You made me do this!"

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

i heard "if they are going to tag gay to marriage anyway why not make a new word for it that is defined as the gay equivalent of marriage"

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 13

Separate but equal, eh? Yeah, I see no problem with that whatsoever! /s

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

its more like "if white plus blue makes light blue why does white plus red make pink and not like red?" plus how does a word seperate?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yes, let's use color theory to argue whether or not marriage equality is right.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Gay people don't say they are getting gay married you idiot. They say they are getting married.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

no but everyone i hear says they need to legalize "gay marraige" not marriage for gays or marriage equality. *shrug* and gay weddings

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Do u understand how adjectives work? Should you not call "black people", people? Why don't they just come up with another word for people?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I mean, nobody says it anymore, it's the law of the land and only a constitutional amendment can change it ;)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

i dont want them to change it but i was trying to show an arguement i have heard that i didnt think was homophobic. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Of course there is. Those who have no issue with gay couples but believe that marriage is a church institution between man and woman.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 7

Yep, not necessarily homophobic in that case, just theocratic. Unless they're campaigning to end legal recognition of marriage altogether.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Also cutting smoking in parks and banning super sized sodas are incredibly good for public health care.

9 years ago | Likes 188 Dislikes 25

So is banning motorcycles and not exercising. Where do you stop?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 12

Smoking and obesity are the world's biggest killer. So shut up with your shitty comparisons.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

not exercising contributes heavily to obesity

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

Do you want a super sized drink? Buy two. Smoke away in the comfort of your own home. These are sensible changes. What is your problem?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

As a smoker I'm completely fine with these laws.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

people bitched initially but now i don't think anyone really gives a crap

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

Just buy two large sized pops if you love pop so much.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

But that makes me feel like the fat ass I am!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's entirely possible to follow a faith that does not agree with it and have no personal issue with homosexuals..

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 8

Also, you cannot be against same-sex marriage because of your religion unless you adhere to every other stupid rule laid out by it.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

But wanting to restrict the rights of other people because of your faith is, by definition, bigotry. You think your beliefs are superior.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

I can believe homosexuality is a sin and want equal rights.. no love in oppression as far as I can tell

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Then you're not anti-same sex marriage, are you?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Hmm well personally I guess I am not for it.. but I would vote for marriage equality.. does that make sense?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Nope legally it's utter bullshit. And my opinion should never bar someone from happiness and fair treatment

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

If your belief says that homosexuals shouldn't be able to marry--regardless of whether it is a religious belief or not--you're homophobic.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Don't agree with gay marriage and I have a couple of gay friends. They know how I feel. We're friendly and I'm not scared of them.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

"Homophobic" is a term of art.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'M ASKING AN HONEST QUESTION HERE AND NOT MAKING A CASE BECAUSE THIS IS NOT MY PERSONAL VIEW...but is "bible forbids it" homophobic?

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 10

In principle, no, just theocratic. But unless they similarly oppose divorce, masturbation, and wealth, then yes, it is probably homophobic.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The Bible forbids it for largely homophobic reasons, so I would argue yes

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

Under the meaning of homophobic wanting to completely ban it because of your personal beliefs IS homophobic no matter what beliefs those are

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

I guess I'm thinking more of the motivations. Does one feel a certain way because of external or internal factors? Maybe it doesn't matter?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

This

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No but it depends. I personally don't agree with gay marriage but I'm not out damning people to hell or trying to get laws passed against it

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well this is the crux then...are you homophobic? I think many would say you are. I'M not saying that but I bet many would. It's touchy.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah good point. I personally don't think so since I bear them no ill thoughts or actions but you're right. Some may still say it is

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What I can't reconcile though is, if you say black people shouldn't be able to marry, that's totally racist. So what's the difference?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yes.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Yes because the bible literally forbids everything. As modern humans we have decided to ignore most of what it says, for example (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 12

That stuff is old testament judicial and cultural law for the Jews. It is no longer relevant to Christians

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Tell that to Christians.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Christians who still nitpick the old testament stuff are the ones who give us a bad rep. They honestly bother me a lot

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Indeed, but divorce is still a NT sin. As is, for that matter, capitalism if we're being picky.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

(to say nothing of Paul's misogyny)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's more vulture capitalism than anything but true. There are still things that are sin it's just none of the weird Jewish cultural stuff

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And yet the criticisms and sins of homosexuality are ALSO old testament.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not entirely. Some is in the NT and also the ten commandments are back there as well but we still use those. The ceremonial law was for Jews

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 n was left in the old covenant, moral law was for everyone n was kept in the new. Difference is now sins can be forgiven w no sacrifice

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it forbids wearing certain mixtures of fabric, tattoos, gluttony, getting remarried, pork- and football, working on the Sabbath, etc. (2/3)

9 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 8

But people forgive all that and focus on gay marriage as if they follow every single rule in the bible, when in fact they pick and chose.

9 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 7

They pick and choose because in the New Testament Jesus says that for Christians you no longer need to be concerned with the things like

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There's also no rationale behind pressure to get rid of (no ban on) large sodas, bans on public smoking, or half these other things (1)

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 6

Liberty and making choices about our own bodies isn't a rationale for large sodas? Smoking in public affects others so quite different

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

That wasn't Trump's platform; and it also doesn't justify the kind of man we elected into office.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Agreed. Fuck, Trump, I'm pro-liberty

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We ban smoking in public businesses bc it's a health hazard. Thank you for playing. http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/111/20/2684.full

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Yeah, duh?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, no, read their second comment. It makes their point make sense

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Pardon me, I stand corrected. Imgur sorting has kinda made a hash of the comments on my screen.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

somehow resulting in an actually racist, white nationalist, bafoonish cheeto being elected into the highest political office in the country.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 4

(2/2)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Show me where he was a "racist" rather than just a bigot

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

"Black guys counting my money. I hate it! The only kind of people I want counting my money are short guys in yarmulkes."

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Again I don't think this is racist. The way he says it may come off as that to some

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Who the f knows! I mean, really, who knows how much Japs will pay for Manhattan property these days."

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I fail to see racism

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And I can't find an exact quote, but his statement (repeatedly defended) that Judge Curiel was incapable of being impartial in the (1)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Trump University case because he is Mexican (later Spanish or hispanic). (2/2)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

this is also ignoring his several lawsuits over discrimination, a slew of other quotes that most would find racist, but that I imagine (1)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(2) that you would ignore/dispute, as well as the thought that being biggotted is somehow different/better than being racist.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

first people need to understand that a republican won after 8 years of democrat in power which is what you'd expect. 90% of his voters were

9 years ago | Likes 439 Dislikes 38

That is very true

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Sep 4, 2017 1:19 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Bernie was the chosen one

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Then they fell for Russian/Right-wing propaganda. Nobody "stole" the nomination from Bernie - he never won it in the first place.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 9

much more plausible than that democrats felt hurt when republican values were ridiculed. sad tho cuz hillary much closer to sanders policies

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Seems to be the perfect example of sinking your ship to kill the captain

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 4

I wish you well with that

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Don't know why you're getting downvoted. I know a few dems that did that too.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

The Dems are STILL in complete denial and as such will probably lose the next presidential race too.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

good chance they disagree w changing to trump. how downvoting someone mentioning that helps is beyond me tho, but thats imgur

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I know a TON of Dems who did this but the mainstream Dems are in complete denial. It's ASTONISHING that they're so Blind.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the data ive seen no more democrats changed sides than they always do. but the ones that did this was likely part of it

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because Sanders supporters who went to Trump didn't support Sanders on issue

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

i dont see how that is his fault tho

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Not Sanders' fault. It's more that people who did that weren't supporting Sanders on issues in the first place. Bandwagon voters

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

s

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not necessarily. The congress was expected to go back to the dems but it stayed republican

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

It usually waits to happen until the midterms.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

republicans who'd vote for any republican candidate. Trump won by a small margin, a few million who might have voted differently

9 years ago | Likes 228 Dislikes 27

He won because of something like 10.000 votes

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Plus, Dems just didn't show up. Lowest Dem turnout in a loooooooooong time.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Technically he won by minus 3 million votes.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Except trump had many of the people who voted for Obama vote for him... I don't know where you got that. The rust belt was all Obama before.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/08/us/politics/election-exit-polls.html?_r=1 only a smidge more than republicans voting hillary

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

there always is a few changing side for whatever reason.there was no large scale political shift,if the was he'd have won popular vote bigly

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He also pulled a lot of the historically democratic base to his side. But that's none of my business

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

compared to previous elections no more than other candidates. there's always ~5% that switch side in both parties

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

He was also going against one of the most hated politicians in modern times.

9 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 4

Most fanatical Dem I knew voted for her GOP opp. when she first ran for the Senate primarily because he didn't want her running for pres.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

indeed the republican campaign against her starting w benghazi tribunals cost her, might even have moved some of the undecided voters

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I'm guessing you're younger if you think the republicans started coming after Clinton with Benghazi. She's been the most hated politician in

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

The last twenty years

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

It was about 100k votes across 3 states that won him the election that is it.

9 years ago | Likes 101 Dislikes 7

Yep. 80K across three states

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

And that's definitely more fair and balanced than just a majority vote because it just makes no sense that more people get more say

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

It has never actually served it's supposed function unless u count FL, WI and MI as sparsely populated agricultural states.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Really interesting stuff, I'm not so sure I agree with the thinking anyway but it's good to know more of that background.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

wait he only won 3 states? man the electoral college is even more unbalanced than i thought

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 21

There are really only 4-5 states that really decide the election with the electoral college.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

huh cause if i remember right when bush won almost any state change could have made him lose it

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

and god fucking hell please please please tell me they didnt let a realityshow looter gain power because their sodasd got too small

9 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 17

As opposed to letting a (in every sense of both words )lying maniac gain power because views of others means one needs a safe space..

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 12

Its not about the soda, its the fact that the govt takes away my freedom to order a large soda, its the principle. This is just an example.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 21, 2017 2:44 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Well thats the democrats stance: bigger government more regulations. The govt is the solution to all problems...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

lol. they did though... imma give him a chance. he isn't my guy, he is my president though.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

the states he won that republicans werent projected to was the rustbelt. he won because democrats didnt offer answers to inequality

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

People don't like having their choices dictated to them. It's about a lot more than that.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 5

I think the decision was partly strategic. If there's a draft, we're not going to win a war with an army that gets winded on 10 stairs.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Haha. I like you.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

well now they will get to make a lot of choices when either they lose healthcare or deficit explodes from taxcuts

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 10

Oh, please understand, I do not at all disagree with you. What I'm saying is Trump channeled this anger into a successful populist movement.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

If people voted for him because of that, I feel like it's my full right to call them morons.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 7

"People who voted for personal freedoms are morons" Yet another reason Trump is president.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

"A city government voted to limit the size of sodas, better vote against environmental, civil rights, and consumer protections"

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

"It happened because there is a small group of liberals who are extremists and think dumb things that the others don't"

9 years ago | Likes 710 Dislikes 89

Extremist groups can be pretty loud, no matter what they babbling about. Loud means media coverage

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A small group, yet somehow that small group tends to be the people that get elected time and time again.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The extremes keep on yelling at eachother with half truths to incite the other side, and the vast majority of us are caught in the middle.

9 years ago | Likes 120 Dislikes 3

Left extreme, is everyone being kind to each other, and maybe not destroying the biosphere. Right Extreme is lots of dead minorities.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Sorry I'm late but left extreme seems to be a lot more over what people can say and do. I'm all for being nice, but you shouldn't force it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bullshit. The 1st Amendment is to the Left what the 2nd is to the Right. The 'what people say' bit is minorities standing up for themselves.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How do you feel on the topic of people wanting to ban certain types of words or phrases? We may be on the same page about this.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right here I am, stuck in the middle with you."

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

We need to be louder than the outliers, I suppose, is the lesson here

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

>small group

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

OP thinks they have right to go through life without suffering disagreement from anyone. What a fragile little snowflake.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Orthodoxy doesn't originate at the political center of a movement

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1 I hate to break it to you, but when the extremists Atlee the ones allowed to control the narrative, nobody gives a shit what the others

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 think. The key word in "silent majority" is SILENT.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Caring about the environment, not smoking in parks, giving trans and gay ppl equal rights, and treating refugees like people arent extremes.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

I was primarily referring to the part about calling people facists, racist, homophobic, and saying stuff is hate speech

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't understand why it feels extreme to them? This isn't PETA like tactics or Westboro tactics, this is just asking for decency.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Small"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"It happened because of the small band of liberal extremists reactions to conservative extremists, but I'm gonna pretend like the second(1)

9 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 13

group doesnt exist and the moderate conservatives were victimized instead" (2/2)

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 8

He/she didn't say the second group doesn't exist, did he/she?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

-1 for the he/she

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn't say he SAID the second group doesn't exist, did I?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm sorry, I thought you meant that with your comments.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Half of these things aren't even extremes, they're just not being a dick to gay and Trans people

9 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 9

It's possible to be against gay marriage and not be homophobic. I've seen people against it who aren't horrible or stupid, just religious

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 16

My issue with being against gay marriage for religious reasons is, not everyone is of your religion, right? There are even cultures that 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

For a very long time have accepted and celebrated homosexual couples, including actual marriage

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

No, not really. You're denying rights to gay people even though their lives have no effect on yours. How is that not homophobic?

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Sorry I'm late, for many it's actually just the definition. Those gay people are free to marry as long as the marriage is opposite sex.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's the same right as a straight person to marry someone of the opposite sex

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You don't have to be horrible or stupid to be homophobic, you just have to not like gays as a group and deny them rights

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Making it marriage and trying to force it through the church is just stupid It should be civil unions with all the legal effects of marriage

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I'm not homophobic, what do I have to fear from a gay guy? A home makeover or some shit?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They don't hate gays, they just believe it's against the Bible. Not my view, just what they think. Some don't think it should be implemented

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2but would kind of be okay with it as well, because it's not their place to deny rights.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That "small group" of liberals sets the tone for the culture as amplified through the mainstream media...

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 7

He's throwing a tantrum because someone said to him, 'don't be an asshole to me.' And it's too much for him to take.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I live in a college town, and I define myself as liberal. This "group" takes one look at me in my pickup truck and assumes I voted for Trump

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Pickup Truck is "out group" behavior because environment. Get you a Prius and you'll be back in favor...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This. The small group was never told to shut it by the larger group and if you did you got shit talked and got no support.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yup. Orthodoxy is not created at the center. Witness, the Roman Catholic Church...for thousands of years.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Was created by the Roman Empire by twisting a small cult into a legal religion and co-opt ing the rest of it into their established society.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To be fair, this is from facebook. He's yelling directly at the other people on facebook, not the entire nation/internet. Facebook is 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

full of the shit he is yelling about, and also full of shit from the other side as well. Facebook is insufferable.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I haven't met a liberal who didn't call me racist for supporting trump.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 6

Hi I'm a gay atheist socialist. You're probably bot racist!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hi! I'm liberal. I disapprove of your decision, but you're probably not racist (though it's hard to say for sure, because I don't know you).

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

You should have votes 3rd party. You're not racist, just misguided.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

But we both know voting 3rd Party is a throwaway vote. Dont get me wrong, I voted for Gary, but he barely made a dent in my state

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

In your opinion.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jan 24, 2017 5:16 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Literally every liberal I've talked to who voted for Trump..

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

That's a whole lotta piss out of you mate

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hold on, let me downvote your personal experience. Because reasons. Or maybe raisins. One of those. (Enjoy the upvote.)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In the US you downvote the truth BC you don't like it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Stinging truth. Surprised you're not negative. Have a second.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why was this downvoted? It's a fact. A lot of Bernie Sanders supporters really did vote for Trump as a "fuck you" to Hilary.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's imgur, they down vote the truth just BC they don't like it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

Everyone's vote is their own, but voting Trump because you didn't get Bernie seems pretty nihilistic to me.

9 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 6

Not necessarily trump and Bernie do agree on some issues such as isolationism and 15 dollar min wage

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

..trump is for that minimum wage? I can't seem to find a source for that but it would be neat

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

He has said specifically he thought raising the minimum wage would be bad for the country.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have not heard that about Trump and min wage, the opposite in fact...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He has flip flopped on it but he has stated 15 10 none and the current min wage

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

More like masochistic. Hillary had absorbed a large number of Bernies positions into the platform, as is often the case, in order to appe

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

More like back assward. I really dont understand the socialist Bernie supporters that voted libertarian

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's not what people are upset about its her shady campaign practices and how the DNC rigged the nominaton

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Appease his voters and get their support. If they don't have coke at McDonald's, I'll have sprite. Don't go fill your cup from the toilet

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

Wow, I've never heard a more astute analogy. May you have all the up votes.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm stealing that one for later use

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It seems to me that there's a lot of nihilism on the left, though.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The goddamm DNC didn't determine the democratic nominee, the voters did. They wanted one of their own, a dem, not an independent, yes,

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 11

Ah yes, because the calculated voter supression where people had to stand in line for 5 hours didn't matter, nor the restricted poll hours..

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

That stuff, if it was actually due to the DNC, is obviously unacceptable, I agree. But no, I still don't think it changed the results. (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No. It was due to the DNC, not if. And since the counties were swing areas, especially in NY, PA and CA, it would have changed things.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

But she won by 1000 delegates, 11 contests, and 3 million votes. And all those people who got so upset about it that they voted for Trump2/3

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

But it was the millions of voters who did or did not vote who determined the winner. Once again, don't blame every liberal who did vote,

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

For something that a handful of DNC people who did something wrong, but inconsequential. Blame those who didn't vote. Or go ahead and blam

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

E the Bernie supporters who did nothing else besides vote. If they wanted to see him win they should have donated time or money like countl

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2