2441 pts ยท July 1, 2013
Has to be photoshop. This would be incredibly irresponsible of a dog owner if they did this.
Could be both.
It's almost like how you spend the money makes a difference.
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say the US is just worse in general.
Wasn't that taught with a reward structure? Sign something and get reward?
If you're gonna call someone stupid, maybe you should take a look in the mirror first? Because I've already made it clear you're still wrong
Already told you that you were wrong in context to the post you responded to. The fact you didn't see that when I said "you're still wrong."
Making the choice not to change yourself for someone to get laid, doesn't make someone an incel. That's literally the opposite of an incel.
Incel is if someone can't get laid but wants to get laid. Aka, involuntary celibate.
I'm surprised you're upset, I told you that you are still wrong. Making the choice not to change yourself to get laid doesn't equal incel.
You're still wrong, are you confused about what involuntary means? Making the choice not to get laid isn't involuntary.
Yes, involuntary. He clearly didn't want it, because he was not willing to shave his beard for it.
Not quite.
Pretty much this.
To that note, your original question. Yes it is wrong, because it isn't a real issue. If it was, trans women wouldn't be able to compete
You didn't even take the time out of your day to take a look, you just share your opinion that you THINK it's not fair.
You literally said it isn't fair. Fair for who? Rules have been set so it is fair, research has been done so it is fair.
You literally said it isn't fair.
There's a reason why trans people are allowed to compete and it isn't some random knobhead that made the rules either.
Stop pretending like it isn't, the people shouting "it isn't fair!" aren't saying it based on the medical science and research done.
Literally look it up, it's been proven it's a non issue. Else not a single trans person would be able to compete.
It's called fearmongering and what republicans have been doing to sway opinions based on no legitimate arguments.
So it's okay to fearmonger now, because something might happen even tho it's been proven to be wrong?
But there isn't anything like that happening and I can guarantee it won't be happening. It's fearmongering. Much like calling lgbt pedos.
Until it's proven that trans women who have gone through transition have such a massive advantage that they win everything, it's a non issue
Not certain why you link your own comment, considering you can't call anyone else out if you know nothing about it.
So presumably, you know nothing about it?
If you're gonna correct someone, at least be right.
It's how I lived when I was growing up, dad built a large fridge you could walk into. It was amazing for the summer.
I don't know, it seems silly to bring up an option that enables it to be safe. When the issue to begin with is people who text and drive.
Has to be photoshop. This would be incredibly irresponsible of a dog owner if they did this.
Could be both.
It's almost like how you spend the money makes a difference.
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say the US is just worse in general.
Wasn't that taught with a reward structure? Sign something and get reward?
If you're gonna call someone stupid, maybe you should take a look in the mirror first? Because I've already made it clear you're still wrong
Already told you that you were wrong in context to the post you responded to. The fact you didn't see that when I said "you're still wrong."
Making the choice not to change yourself for someone to get laid, doesn't make someone an incel. That's literally the opposite of an incel.
Incel is if someone can't get laid but wants to get laid. Aka, involuntary celibate.
I'm surprised you're upset, I told you that you are still wrong. Making the choice not to change yourself to get laid doesn't equal incel.
You're still wrong, are you confused about what involuntary means? Making the choice not to get laid isn't involuntary.
Yes, involuntary. He clearly didn't want it, because he was not willing to shave his beard for it.
Not quite.
Pretty much this.
To that note, your original question. Yes it is wrong, because it isn't a real issue. If it was, trans women wouldn't be able to compete
You didn't even take the time out of your day to take a look, you just share your opinion that you THINK it's not fair.
You literally said it isn't fair. Fair for who? Rules have been set so it is fair, research has been done so it is fair.
You literally said it isn't fair.
There's a reason why trans people are allowed to compete and it isn't some random knobhead that made the rules either.
Stop pretending like it isn't, the people shouting "it isn't fair!" aren't saying it based on the medical science and research done.
Literally look it up, it's been proven it's a non issue. Else not a single trans person would be able to compete.
It's called fearmongering and what republicans have been doing to sway opinions based on no legitimate arguments.
So it's okay to fearmonger now, because something might happen even tho it's been proven to be wrong?
But there isn't anything like that happening and I can guarantee it won't be happening. It's fearmongering. Much like calling lgbt pedos.
Until it's proven that trans women who have gone through transition have such a massive advantage that they win everything, it's a non issue
Not certain why you link your own comment, considering you can't call anyone else out if you know nothing about it.
So presumably, you know nothing about it?
If you're gonna correct someone, at least be right.
It's how I lived when I was growing up, dad built a large fridge you could walk into. It was amazing for the summer.
I don't know, it seems silly to bring up an option that enables it to be safe. When the issue to begin with is people who text and drive.