uo111

4349 pts ยท February 9, 2013


Because you are complaining about a different group fighting against injustice. You don't do that if you are doing the same thing. :')

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I described exactly what you did, in plain English. No one is assuming anything.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yes, the answer is yes.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you also believe that Obama is funding ISIS and wants all police to die and trump will be a good president?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 18

And here you are complaining about BLM instead of fighting against perceived injustice.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

To those people, support to whites is the only way to go, and all other races are just whining and don't work hard.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 10

It took a police shooting for people to realize racist rhetoric is dangerous and divisive?

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Good luck convincing a judge you felt threatened by a black guy pulling his wallet out if you aren't a police officer.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

His brother convinced him to give up the gun because he definitely would've been shot if he hadn't.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If it was the other way around.... oh wait this happens all the time. W

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 10

Well if you believe abortions are murder of a human, and murder is wrong, then 0%. The point is, we don't think abortion is murder.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

All it says is that anything can be commodified with marketing. But water means drinking water everywhere, no one is confused by that.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Did you... say water isn't a specific term?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Food is a very broad term. Water is a very specific term. And we do in fact provide food to those who need it.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

More than 99% of species that have ever existed are extinct... so... yes?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Letting a species go extinct that was mad by us and is only useful to us will only hurt us. Not very monstrous.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Would you mind posting a link to a story about that? I'd love to read it

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Focusing on the victim to lead the charge against the assailant is idealistic at best. There are many reasons women don't come forward.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

You can't publicly investigate it.... unless there is no reasonable doubt... which there always will be.... because you can't investigate it

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

If the health inspector conducts a "random" inspection, we know the NSA is reading this.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm surprised healthy food is being appreciated. (surprised isn't a large enough word to describe my feelings). Favorited though.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Omg it's so cute!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm obviously not talking about the accused...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most people can sing live. But they don't all sound good.

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 3

No proof no conviction is fine. The point is that treating someone like a liar instead of listening to them is inhumane and harmful.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You can research these things. I have and the answers to those questions do not support your point of view, at all.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Did you miss the whole Bill Cosby thing? 28 women were called liars and people still defended him after he was shown admitting it

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

It's more like, "did he/she take advantage of someone who got too drunk." If they drugged them, it's more serious because malicious intent.

10 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 2