1299 pts · January 16, 2012
Hacking is the unauthorised use of or access into computers or networks by using security vulnerabilities or bypassing usual security steps to gain access.Breaching TOS by using bots to generate plays (or views on other platforms) revokes your right to access the files stored on Spotifys servers. It's really the judges call when TOS are enforceable or not, but in this case there seems like a clear intent to defraud.
You're right. In my home Yorkshire (North England) we're allergic to pronouncing hard H so we might use "an 'istoric" in formal settings.
We still war worship in England 🙄 mostly with weird public nostalgia for wars past. It's gross.
(this is how we posted on social media back in the day kiddies, dead bits of tree!!)
Here ya go https://www.reddit.com/r/BookCollecting/comments/m61qmk/does_anyone_here_have_a_pdf_copy_of_the/
Maybe it's a weird sex thing and he's lying to drs. Needles and weird sex things are often in the same place.
Building an 'immigration wall' blocking the road backed up with trucks to fix the dam, more like.
It works though. Announce the shit in your shit sandwich in advance to get complaints out the way and build it 'worse' so you have room to roll back a little and rebuild goodwill. Public opinion managed.
I guess that's where we disagree, I cannot see that as a reasonable thing to want to test. Testing if you can become a dictator is bad. People that succeed in that test are dictators.Trump is asking SCOTUS to rule that POTUS should be able to be dictator, effectively petitioning the court to strip it's own power. It's both unreasonable and a waste of time.A better equivalence than the 5th amendment would be a defendant shouting 'this is a kangaroo court and I don't respect it's judgements'.
If you can flippantly argue immunity in court for as long as you like without it hurting your case then deaths row inmates have a new out. Hell throw it in at the beginning of every trial, 'I'm immune to speeding officer'. Making pointless arguments hurts the judicial system (and by proxy the people) and is rightly viewed poorly by judges. Everyone knows the president isn't immune from throwing insurrections. Nixon wasn't even immune for planting a few bugs when he tried that argument.
Pleading the 5th is a false equivalence that sounds designed to lend the 5th amendment's legitimacy to what is a ridiculous claim of immunity from crime.As far as I can tell if Trump is successful then a constitutional rework is required to protect America from its new dictator role, as the president can violently overthrow the other houses without legal recourse.🇬🇧 good luck with that, I'm the other side of the pond watching the fireworks.
True, but most of the developed world has dealt with it (pay as you earn taxes)
Tldr: nothing to do with trump paying bills.
Our grandmothers wore lead paint, so our mothers could wear ugly colours, so we could become tikthots. #blessed
Post-post industrial electrofunk
and most of your words are just... bullshit, so yeah that too.
Can't make a big brain without bags of compassion, all the external gestation where we have to finish developing outside the womb means people need looking after for years!
Education is the great leveler, so it depends how equal you want people to be. America is such a weird country, it seems like everyone talks like the government is some external force, not just them acting in an official capacity
Yeah bro, genocide for genocide, so simple to achieve world peace why doesn't any see it but you!?!
As a Brit I find it wise to not bring up others' ancestor's crimes.
How many imperial football fields is it?
"blocks" 😂 London wasn't designed, like American cities are. Almost none of the UK is (maybe Milton Keynes).London was slowly deposited on the bank of the Thames like the filth it is.
What happened to Christianity? Read a history book dude, organised religion was always a shitshow designed to consolidate power and spread hate. If it was about divinity, there wouldn't be a person in charge sat on a throne of gold.
But you're the one doing tone policing, it matches Ben Shapiro's tone so you discount the content when it's correct 🫤
"no hope for a future" - fix that but, that's broken. It's supposed to be about reform. Otherwise crime is permitted, you just pay with slavery.
Hacking is the unauthorised use of or access into computers or networks by using security vulnerabilities or bypassing usual security steps to gain access.
Breaching TOS by using bots to generate plays (or views on other platforms) revokes your right to access the files stored on Spotifys servers. It's really the judges call when TOS are enforceable or not, but in this case there seems like a clear intent to defraud.
You're right. In my home Yorkshire (North England) we're allergic to pronouncing hard H so we might use "an 'istoric" in formal settings.
We still war worship in England 🙄 mostly with weird public nostalgia for wars past. It's gross.
(this is how we posted on social media back in the day kiddies, dead bits of tree!!)
Here ya go https://www.reddit.com/r/BookCollecting/comments/m61qmk/does_anyone_here_have_a_pdf_copy_of_the/
Maybe it's a weird sex thing and he's lying to drs. Needles and weird sex things are often in the same place.
Building an 'immigration wall' blocking the road backed up with trucks to fix the dam, more like.
It works though. Announce the shit in your shit sandwich in advance to get complaints out the way and build it 'worse' so you have room to roll back a little and rebuild goodwill. Public opinion managed.
I guess that's where we disagree, I cannot see that as a reasonable thing to want to test. Testing if you can become a dictator is bad. People that succeed in that test are dictators.
Trump is asking SCOTUS to rule that POTUS should be able to be dictator, effectively petitioning the court to strip it's own power. It's both unreasonable and a waste of time.
A better equivalence than the 5th amendment would be a defendant shouting 'this is a kangaroo court and I don't respect it's judgements'.
If you can flippantly argue immunity in court for as long as you like without it hurting your case then deaths row inmates have a new out. Hell throw it in at the beginning of every trial, 'I'm immune to speeding officer'. Making pointless arguments hurts the judicial system (and by proxy the people) and is rightly viewed poorly by judges. Everyone knows the president isn't immune from throwing insurrections. Nixon wasn't even immune for planting a few bugs when he tried that argument.
Pleading the 5th is a false equivalence that sounds designed to lend the 5th amendment's legitimacy to what is a ridiculous claim of immunity from crime.
As far as I can tell if Trump is successful then a constitutional rework is required to protect America from its new dictator role, as the president can violently overthrow the other houses without legal recourse.
🇬🇧 good luck with that, I'm the other side of the pond watching the fireworks.
True, but most of the developed world has dealt with it (pay as you earn taxes)
Tldr: nothing to do with trump paying bills.
Our grandmothers wore lead paint, so our mothers could wear ugly colours, so we could become tikthots. #blessed
Post-post industrial electrofunk
and most of your words are just... bullshit, so yeah that too.
Can't make a big brain without bags of compassion, all the external gestation where we have to finish developing outside the womb means people need looking after for years!
Education is the great leveler, so it depends how equal you want people to be. America is such a weird country, it seems like everyone talks like the government is some external force, not just them acting in an official capacity
Yeah bro, genocide for genocide, so simple to achieve world peace why doesn't any see it but you!?!
As a Brit I find it wise to not bring up others' ancestor's crimes.
How many imperial football fields is it?
"blocks" 😂 London wasn't designed, like American cities are. Almost none of the UK is (maybe Milton Keynes).
London was slowly deposited on the bank of the Thames like the filth it is.
What happened to Christianity? Read a history book dude, organised religion was always a shitshow designed to consolidate power and spread hate. If it was about divinity, there wouldn't be a person in charge sat on a throne of gold.
But you're the one doing tone policing, it matches Ben Shapiro's tone so you discount the content when it's correct 🫤
"no hope for a future" - fix that but, that's broken. It's supposed to be about reform. Otherwise crime is permitted, you just pay with slavery.