11378 pts · March 24, 2013
If someone screenshots this and it makes the front page, I will cringe.
My story is so similar to yours! I hear you! Glad you have your life back! Still waiting for mine :)
ME TOO!!
I just ate a bar of this today! It was really taste! VERY sweet though
I always do! Still going to hear about it though!
Wouldn’t it be weird if aliens happened to use the same grading system as us. I find that more unlikely than the jar on the shelf thing.
I feel ya, had to move to Coquitlam.
I tried, 300% too scary for the likes of me.
Literally dozens!
Wow, you really raised that bar!
Lord have mercy.
I refuse to acknowledge that this happens.
Me too! We can breathe for a bit longer.
We like this! It's only when the math has been fudged and there is no logic, that's when it's frustrating.
For the majority of our history, homosexuals still would breed because of society, or in some instances against their will.
Evolution just acts on what exists. Genes for homosexuality may have arisen first, and if the result is the same, selection is not picky(1)
No, there is no selection against these genes because they are not harmful.
advantage in the development of our species and other. It is only not as obvious in our very recent history.
The benefit of extra care to the offspring is greater than if two siblings had their own children, with less care, which created a large (1)
Yes, it is not limited to humans.
If you would like to talk more about this, I don't mind using the chat option, because convo via comments can be quite tedious!
but human society has only existed for a fraction of a second compared to the amount of time that homosexuality has been an advantage.
effects so it doesn't decrease either. Hetero offspring can still pass on these genes for their siblings if they don't breed. (4)
of an advantage is first world countries where offspring don't compete for resources as much, but it still exists, and there are no neg (3)
years ago. So this method of offspring care has been beneficial enough to perpetuate through multiple species. It may not be as much (2)
Well humans have observed homosexuality in over 1500 species, meaning that in the tree of life, it probably originated a few 100 million (1)
homosexuality. Again, that's like not agreeing with the fact that someone is tall. It's a nonsensical statement.
I agree there are other factors, but biologically speaking, homosexuality proves beneficial. It doesn't make sense to "disagree" with (1)
(2) and create additional helpers.
It's a factor because the offspring that benefit from extra carers, also carry these genes and pass them on. It is beneficial to have (1)
My story is so similar to yours! I hear you! Glad you have your life back! Still waiting for mine :)
ME TOO!!
I just ate a bar of this today! It was really taste! VERY sweet though
I always do! Still going to hear about it though!
Wouldn’t it be weird if aliens happened to use the same grading system as us. I find that more unlikely than the jar on the shelf thing.
I feel ya, had to move to Coquitlam.
I tried, 300% too scary for the likes of me.
Literally dozens!
Wow, you really raised that bar!
Lord have mercy.
I refuse to acknowledge that this happens.
Me too! We can breathe for a bit longer.
We like this! It's only when the math has been fudged and there is no logic, that's when it's frustrating.
For the majority of our history, homosexuals still would breed because of society, or in some instances against their will.
Evolution just acts on what exists. Genes for homosexuality may have arisen first, and if the result is the same, selection is not picky(1)
No, there is no selection against these genes because they are not harmful.
advantage in the development of our species and other. It is only not as obvious in our very recent history.
The benefit of extra care to the offspring is greater than if two siblings had their own children, with less care, which created a large (1)
Yes, it is not limited to humans.
If you would like to talk more about this, I don't mind using the chat option, because convo via comments can be quite tedious!
but human society has only existed for a fraction of a second compared to the amount of time that homosexuality has been an advantage.
effects so it doesn't decrease either. Hetero offspring can still pass on these genes for their siblings if they don't breed. (4)
of an advantage is first world countries where offspring don't compete for resources as much, but it still exists, and there are no neg (3)
years ago. So this method of offspring care has been beneficial enough to perpetuate through multiple species. It may not be as much (2)
Well humans have observed homosexuality in over 1500 species, meaning that in the tree of life, it probably originated a few 100 million (1)
homosexuality. Again, that's like not agreeing with the fact that someone is tall. It's a nonsensical statement.
I agree there are other factors, but biologically speaking, homosexuality proves beneficial. It doesn't make sense to "disagree" with (1)
I agree there are other factors, but biologically speaking, homosexuality proves beneficial. It doesn't make sense to "disagree" with (1)
(2) and create additional helpers.
It's a factor because the offspring that benefit from extra carers, also carry these genes and pass them on. It is beneficial to have (1)