I Got Beans Greens Potatoes Tomatoes Lamb Rams Hogs Maws Beans Greens Potatoes Tomatoes Chicken Turkeys Rabbit YOU NAME IT! Beans Greens Potatoes Tomatoes Lamb Rams Hogs Maws Beans Greens Potatoes Tomatoes Chicken Turkeys Chicken Turkeys Beans Greens Potatoes Tomatoes Lamb Rams Hogs Maws Beans Greens Potatoes Tomatoes Chicken Turkeys Rabbit YOU NAME IT! Beans Greens Potatoes Tomatoes Beans Greens Potatoes Tomatoes Beans Greens Beans Greens Beans Beans Beans Beans Beans Greens Potatoes Tomatoes Chicken Turkeys, Chicken Turkeys Beans Greens Potatoes Tomatoes Chicken Turkeys, Chicken Turkeys YOU NAME IT! YOU NAME IT! YOU NAME IT! YOU NAME IT!
I think you missed a very, very, very, very large part of that comment. They said a working WARP DRIVE, not our standard rocket engines
I hate to tell you this, buddy, but they already do that. Try to torrent without a VPN and you will very quickly get a letter telling you what you downloaded, what your ip is, how long you downloaded, etc. This judgement is good for several reasons.
1. It keeps the status quo, which is easy to beat
2. It prevents isp shutdowns
3. It keeps isp's from having to spy harder to prevent users from doing naughty things
4. It keeps pirates from having to step up their game, which would make things wors
It should all boil down to a liability problem. Did Ford or S&W have a reasonable way to prevent how their items were used? Guns are used for sport and entertainment far more than they are for hunting or shooting people. Cars are used far more often for getting to a destination than they are for running over people. Should we also put the blame on computer manufacturers for electronic crimes? Or drill manufacturers if someone drills a safe with one? No, because that is terrible logic
It is funny you say that, cause a lot of gun control advocates actually want guns treated this way. Another good one is suing car manufacturers for car accidents
The sewer lid is further
I absolutely hate it. There is no point in it, and it just creates extra complexity for no good reason. The first item should not be 0!
Glad my case has the button on the front under a ledge
Neat
I think there's a "let this grieving soul retire" joke in there somewhere
Oh please. They will do whatever they want, without false flags. They don't care, and they don't need our approval. But hey, go vote!
That's the problem, drunk people cannot consent. They are under the influence of mind altering substances. Their decision making abilities have been altered, influenced, and in some instances completely overridden. The same reason that people with certain mental conditions can't consent. They don't have the decision making capacity to consent. I'm sorry that it hits home, but it is the truth
Neat
And I'm going to get downvoted to oblivion for this, because a lot of people have had drunk sex and don't like to think of it as what it really is. A lot of drugs, alcohol included, remove a lot of the decision making and filters that we have placed as barriers for what makes it possible to consent to sex.
Pretty much, yes, because those decisions were made under the influence of substances that alter your normal decision making processes. Any woman or man who has sex with an inebriated person, no matter how little or much they have had to drink, is having sex with someone who is not in control of their decision making processes. If they are both drunk, they are both culpable. The only exception is if they give full enthusiastic consent BEFORE imbibing the altering substance.
Because imgur is, unfortunately, full of stupid, much like everywhere else these days. And stupid loves playing follow the leader. One stupid person downvotes because they don't get the joke (or they are just spiteful, who knows), and that leads to a lot of the other stupid reaching the same conclusion and following the leader. It was a funny joke, but one person thought they were being an ass, and a bunch of other idiots followed
https://media1.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWE1NzM3M2U1YWMxbGp5MXpmeHlrMzNsZ25tdjA2eGhtYW01Z3IybW95cmYyd2p2ZSZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/BPJmthQ3YRwD6QqcVD/200w.webp
I can't respect most religions because their deities are evil. The Christian god, according to their book, drowned an absolutely insane number of children. Anyone who worships a being like that should, at the very least, be ineligible for any position of power, including parenthood, politician, public speaker, or any kind of speaker.
I could help with compression if you need a hand. Or two.
Sorry, I'll see myself out
Unless you frame it as "this hurts the rich". Then it gets all kinds of support. All it takes is the right propaganda. The far left and far right are both just as susceptible to it
But it makes rich people pay for something! It is the ultimate good! /s The far left is just as dumb as the far right, they just claim a moral high ground on a couple of key points. And I'll give them that they have slightly better morals on those points. But God are they stupid about everything else
And now you have to make a pizza when they hit their new goal, and include something else, cause a pizza is the bare minimum
Or does it have to be an active, obvious situation in order for the line to have been crossed? What about bdsm collars? If they are discrete, is that ok? Or is it only a problem if they have a padlock and say "slave" or "princess" or something that makes it obviously not a normal accessory? In all cases, other people become unwilling observers or participants, they just might not know.
Probably going to get downvoted, but idc, I just think it is interesting. But where does the line exist? And why does it exist there? Like the peta billboard that has all the animals saying which would you eat. Why is kissing and hugging in public ok, but grabbing a butt too far? Why is walking around the corner out of sight to make out not acceptable, but texting explicit things in public ok? Why are the lines what they are? And does merely wearing a plug/vibrating device in public cross it?
Probably pee stuff. In which case, go for it. It is difficult to find participants
I thought elucidating was when you saw things that weren't real
#31 it was also the most painful
I might have fallen in love with the smile, but the tt's would make me smile
AI fake news
Your mom is AI. STFU
Eh, people over explain software to me, and I'm a software engineer. People talk to everyone as if that person knows nothing, because 99% of people know nothing about their profession. Getting upset is a failure on your part to see things from their perspective and deciding that they are dick heads because you don't understand why they do what they do