11335 pts ยท July 21, 2016
Peek-a-boo
"78% of quotes on the internet are false." - President Ronald Reagan
#2 is false
+1 and cheers to you
Just what the world has asked for: a more difficult way to tie a tie.
(2/2) and this is different than any other Amendment. 1st amendment rights are subject to all sorts of regulation. No right is absolute.
(1/2) My point is no one is advocating actual repeal of 2nd Am but attempts at regulation are wrongly characterized as attempts to repeal
+1
Show me one person in a legitimate position of power who has advocated repealing the 2nd Amendment.
All other amendments are subject to reasonable regulation, but somehow the 2nd Amendment is a zero sum game. Any regulation = repealing?!?!?
Reminds me of reading fortunes in the leftover grounds of Turkish coffee. https://www.eater.com/2015/11/13/9707472/turkish-coffee-reading
Me at a bachelor charity auction
Also note that Andrew Jackson died in 1845. Civil War started in 1861.
How many Americans could do the same for the Canadian anthem?
If you're dressing like a Target employee you're gonna have a bad time
Look at negligence elements https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/negligence not saying texter isn't contributorily negligent tho
You're conflating whether it's against the law with whether OP could be liable for the accident.
But it could certainly be negligent in this situation.
*images of the characters as interpreted by the movie
Cheers pal. Great young team you've got there.
you
Shame on
Coked up and creamy?
Sure, if you want to use facts to make an argument. But what about my vague gut feeling based on political rhetoric and bad information?
Hard to say...OV check was nothing but Niskanen gets him pretty good on the leg
Got Niskanen for the slash
TFW it's 3-2 v
This is awesome. Also my favorite movie when I was a kid.
So how was it?
Haha. I get it. The joke is that you're a dangerous sexual predator.
Peek-a-boo
"78% of quotes on the internet are false." - President Ronald Reagan
#2 is false
+1 and cheers to you
Just what the world has asked for: a more difficult way to tie a tie.
(2/2) and this is different than any other Amendment. 1st amendment rights are subject to all sorts of regulation. No right is absolute.
(1/2) My point is no one is advocating actual repeal of 2nd Am but attempts at regulation are wrongly characterized as attempts to repeal
+1
Show me one person in a legitimate position of power who has advocated repealing the 2nd Amendment.
All other amendments are subject to reasonable regulation, but somehow the 2nd Amendment is a zero sum game. Any regulation = repealing?!?!?
Reminds me of reading fortunes in the leftover grounds of Turkish coffee. https://www.eater.com/2015/11/13/9707472/turkish-coffee-reading
Me at a bachelor charity auction
Also note that Andrew Jackson died in 1845. Civil War started in 1861.
How many Americans could do the same for the Canadian anthem?
If you're dressing like a Target employee you're gonna have a bad time
Look at negligence elements https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/negligence not saying texter isn't contributorily negligent tho
You're conflating whether it's against the law with whether OP could be liable for the accident.
But it could certainly be negligent in this situation.
*images of the characters as interpreted by the movie
Cheers pal. Great young team you've got there.
you
Shame on
Coked up and creamy?
Sure, if you want to use facts to make an argument. But what about my vague gut feeling based on political rhetoric and bad information?
Hard to say...OV check was nothing but Niskanen gets him pretty good on the leg
Got Niskanen for the slash
TFW it's 3-2
v
This is awesome. Also my favorite movie when I was a kid.
So how was it?
Haha. I get it. The joke is that you're a dangerous sexual predator.