could

-152 pts · March 17, 2014


Are they Republican trans advocates?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Great points guys. Really focusing on what you can do with capitalism. I hope you figure it out and stop being such complaining sad sacks.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Burning Harry Potter as well.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Pretty sure they still love it.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Trader Joe’s is doing things better if we are talking about food quality.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I didn’t watch the movie, but is there any relation to transgenderism here?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Finally something the left and the right can agree on.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

These options both suck, I’m sorry.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

80% chance this photo was taken with a cell phone.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

And it would make you rich if you figured it out. #capitalism

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

The obstacle is the way, bro.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Someone else did it. If this is something that NEEDS to be fixed, then someone would rise to the occasion. It would be very admirable.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Positive GDP absolutely helps the people. We have more money and possibilities because of this.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

I feel strongly that this is what is happening at grocery stores like Trader Joe’s for instance. They take market share with better stuff.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Okay new solution on top of not buying: create a new product to the specifications demanded by the public. Market it as food justice.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Okay, all I’m saying is that not buying would 100% work. Creating legislation would obviously be incredibly difficult and possibly abusive.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Yeah? If the government likes what you are doing for it, and they reward you for it with tax breaks, why wouldn’t you take it?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Things need funding. We can’t go bankrupt forming and upholding laws like “keep the same ingredients in cookies.”

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It was. But not before boycotts.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Maybe you’re right that they should pay some. But they are following tax incentives to better the U.S. economy.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Worked against segregation.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Make your own oatmeal cookie business if it’s so obvious.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

You want laws to protect your sugary deserts then?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

North Korea apparently…

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

And it’s destroying minority communities.

3 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 3

It’s my understanding that the large corporations reach global customers/investors and bring more wealth into the U.S. where small do not.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2