178320 pts ยท May 18, 2019
Comment sparked a large reply thread.
oh what the fuck is this bullshit.
well I mean regardless of law, just on medical grounds since we're talking about a child, it would be an extreme risk/emergency situation.
I think there's already been a release about this and that it would obviously be under an emergency exception. Iirc that is.
It apparently is what they want, it's included in the opinion and there's really no other reason for bothering to mention it.
yeah the one with the concurrence that explicitly says this is blatantly unconstitutional and would just be wasting everyone's time.
Nah not a chance, not for just traveling between states. None of this shit would hold up.
With some fava beans and a nice chianti
presumptively unconstitutional.
It's a right to travel, privilege and immunities violation, it's mentioned in one of the concurrences that any attempt to do this would be
wasn't there a war about this or something
Another limit would be pardoning someone for an offense that hasn't yet occurred, it has to be exercised after the commission
There's no proactive pardon power and no control over state prosecution.
People taking regular 8, 9% reductions in wages in terms of purchasing power and an inflationary spiral driven by expectations is much worse
Hes talking about from the feds perspective, what would be required on the demand side since they have no control of oil or crop production.
It's never lupus.
yeah, weird how that works.
stress intensifies
wat
yeah that's what I mean, the process is the same except with consent as default.
Right but you can do implied consent and use licenses or govt/school ID, medical id tags/bracelets for opt out.
In fairness, we might have to deal with a food crisis so there's still hope.
The fact we don't use implied consent and universal opt out is completely fucking backward, could save tens of thousands of lives a year.
oh what the fuck is this bullshit.
well I mean regardless of law, just on medical grounds since we're talking about a child, it would be an extreme risk/emergency situation.
I think there's already been a release about this and that it would obviously be under an emergency exception. Iirc that is.
It apparently is what they want, it's included in the opinion and there's really no other reason for bothering to mention it.
yeah the one with the concurrence that explicitly says this is blatantly unconstitutional and would just be wasting everyone's time.
Nah not a chance, not for just traveling between states. None of this shit would hold up.
With some fava beans and a nice chianti
presumptively unconstitutional.
It's a right to travel, privilege and immunities violation, it's mentioned in one of the concurrences that any attempt to do this would be
wasn't there a war about this or something
Another limit would be pardoning someone for an offense that hasn't yet occurred, it has to be exercised after the commission
There's no proactive pardon power and no control over state prosecution.
People taking regular 8, 9% reductions in wages in terms of purchasing power and an inflationary spiral driven by expectations is much worse
Hes talking about from the feds perspective, what would be required on the demand side since they have no control of oil or crop production.
It's never lupus.
yeah, weird how that works.
stress intensifies
wat
yeah that's what I mean, the process is the same except with consent as default.
Right but you can do implied consent and use licenses or govt/school ID, medical id tags/bracelets for opt out.
In fairness, we might have to deal with a food crisis so there's still hope.
The fact we don't use implied consent and universal opt out is completely fucking backward, could save tens of thousands of lives a year.