Muskets and only muskets

Jun 10, 2022 7:29 PM

https://twitter.com/BraddrofliT/status/1534751163773423616?t=JzEuQR7KA6B1zjgOeU6BYg&s=19

The real question is does it cover trebuchets?

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Likely also includes cannons, wouldn't mind owning one of those for the times my neighbors are partying loudly at 3am.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

The "Textualists" want to tweak their opinion on the "intent of the Founders" factor.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Suppose they invent some kind of phased laser disrupter in the future. Does the 2nd amendment automatically give you the right to own it?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

he means 'fixed cartridge ammunition' & 'muzzle loader' & he's omitting field pieces, rockets, the puckle gun & likely a host of others.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Considering early 30-shot repeaters predate the amendment by more than a century... And let's not even go to repeating crossbows.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I hate this assumption that the founding fathers, smart people in military service, couldn't imagine that weapons tech would advance.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You can argue they couldn't have foreseen the plane, radio or nuke, but that a gun might one day shoot more rapidly and accurately? Really?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I need a Puckle Gun for home defense

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Tally ho, you rapscallion!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

With that logic the first amendment doesnt cover freedom of speech on radio, movies, television, internet and so on... strange, it does tho.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

yeah, weird how that works.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Indeed. "Intelligence is the ability to adapt to change." The advent of efficient weaponry should have been the trigger for new legislation.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Well the internet was invented 50 years ago, so if you want free speech get a wood box and go scream in the town square.

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

Thank you. There it is. That's why this argument is fucking stupid.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I mean, if you want to get technical, melee weapons are arms too. Even muskets aren't explicitly covered.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*enters school with plate armor, broadsword and morningstar*

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And yet it’s more difficult to get certain blades in some states than it is to get weapons of war. Because the blades are highly regulated.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I guess by "bullet" he means metallic cartridges...?

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

I think he is referring to the first conical bullet, instead of round musket balls: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mini%C3%A9_ball

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Oh, right! Yeah, probably that. My derp.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Jun 11, 2022 7:45 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

1847 was the debut of the Minie Ball, the first widespread non-spherical bullet, though earlier conical bullets were made in the 1820s.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I assume they mean 'bullet' as in the complete assembly of projectile, primer, propellant, and casing. Before that you assembled each shot.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Close, but that was Flobert in 1845. 1847 introduced the Minie Ball, which wasn't the first such bullet but was the first successful one.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So that's my guess as to what the tweet references. Not 100% accurate but to fit in a tweet, some imprecision is tolerable.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...musket used bullets. Holy fuck people are stupid.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 9

Muskets of the 1700s used round ball shot. Not bullets. Bullets are hammer fired. Muskets use black powder.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

It's still a bullet. You, and the OP, are confusing bullets for cartridges. The type of powder is meaningless.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lack of knowledge, or intellectual dishonesty? With "library of Alexandria" in almost everyone's pockets it's easy to suspect the latter.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Guess where the word "bullet" comes from. And no, bullets have nothing to do with hammers.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Bullets are literally cartridge ammunition. Which didn’t exist in the 1700s.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Bullet comes from the French word meaning "little ball". And are not "cartridge ammunition".

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

So what? That doesn’t change when the bullet was invented, what a bullet actually is or what kind of ammunition was fired from a musket.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4