1871 pts ยท November 10, 2011
Just to be a data point for you, I've read the whole bible and am still a Christian. Just got back from a missions trip on tuesday
Same meaning, sure, but we were running out of genaric question words
Wherefore doth someone buy a buffalo?
If you're not eating at all 1 day a week you make back a chunk... I guess?
I'm a type 1 diabetic and I've done fasting before. Totally doable for me personally
You should sell prints for startup capitol. Pull a Christo and Jeanne Claude and be all "Pay me money for my idea so I can make it real, yo"
Post it?
will. Again, this is where I would say there's a difference between knowing and controlling. (6/6)
the temptation. Another point would be that question of whether the deceiver was placed in the garden or chose to be there of it's own(5/6)
She is the same as a child who doesn't really understand why there are rules yet, but that doesn't mean that she couldn't have resisted(4/?)
One point is that while Eve didn't have an understanding of what good and evil are, she did have instructions not to eat from the tree(3/?)
... addressed some aspects of the story tat I would say make a difference.
... addressed some aspects of the story that I would say make a difference. A) While eve didn't have an intrinsic knowledge of good and(2/?)
I definitely see where you're coming from with that point, and I'm not saying you're totally wrong, but I feel like you haven't... (1/?)
I disagree. I would say that I allowed it to fall, knowing the outcome, but wasn't the cause.
Yeh pretty much
... due to gravity, but I'm not the cause of the outcome, despite knowing that it will take place.
There is a difference between knowing something will happen and causing it to. If I release something from my grasp, I know it will fall 1/2
... i.e. there is no first thing, OR you believe that something came before everything else, including time, and has always been. 2/2.
I'm not an athiest, but the way I see it, either you believe that things go back infinitely, always created by the thing before it 1/2
Long living people from Lord of the Rings lore. Aragon was one
Ooh, that's tender!
In our homebrew RPG, we use GM because probably ~90% of the game doesn't take place in a dungeon...
I think this depends on what you mean by dishonest. Not letting a check succeed regardless of roll might be necessary in some situations
Great username for this comment
I appreciate that nintendo is taking risks to innovate rather than doing the same thing over and over...
That probably only applies if it's concealed, right? I think most places it's still legal to carry swords in the open, this is probs similar
Just to be a data point for you, I've read the whole bible and am still a Christian. Just got back from a missions trip on tuesday
Same meaning, sure, but we were running out of genaric question words
Wherefore doth someone buy a buffalo?
If you're not eating at all 1 day a week you make back a chunk... I guess?
I'm a type 1 diabetic and I've done fasting before. Totally doable for me personally
You should sell prints for startup capitol. Pull a Christo and Jeanne Claude and be all "Pay me money for my idea so I can make it real, yo"
Post it?
Post it?
will. Again, this is where I would say there's a difference between knowing and controlling. (6/6)
the temptation. Another point would be that question of whether the deceiver was placed in the garden or chose to be there of it's own(5/6)
She is the same as a child who doesn't really understand why there are rules yet, but that doesn't mean that she couldn't have resisted(4/?)
One point is that while Eve didn't have an understanding of what good and evil are, she did have instructions not to eat from the tree(3/?)
... addressed some aspects of the story tat I would say make a difference.
... addressed some aspects of the story that I would say make a difference. A) While eve didn't have an intrinsic knowledge of good and(2/?)
I definitely see where you're coming from with that point, and I'm not saying you're totally wrong, but I feel like you haven't... (1/?)
I disagree. I would say that I allowed it to fall, knowing the outcome, but wasn't the cause.
Yeh pretty much
... due to gravity, but I'm not the cause of the outcome, despite knowing that it will take place.
There is a difference between knowing something will happen and causing it to. If I release something from my grasp, I know it will fall 1/2
... i.e. there is no first thing, OR you believe that something came before everything else, including time, and has always been. 2/2.
I'm not an athiest, but the way I see it, either you believe that things go back infinitely, always created by the thing before it 1/2
Long living people from Lord of the Rings lore. Aragon was one
Ooh, that's tender!
Ooh, that's tender!
In our homebrew RPG, we use GM because probably ~90% of the game doesn't take place in a dungeon...
I think this depends on what you mean by dishonest. Not letting a check succeed regardless of roll might be necessary in some situations
I think this depends on what you mean by dishonest. Not letting a check succeed regardless of roll might be necessary in some situations
Great username for this comment
I appreciate that nintendo is taking risks to innovate rather than doing the same thing over and over...
That probably only applies if it's concealed, right? I think most places it's still legal to carry swords in the open, this is probs similar