9808 pts ยท January 3, 2015
it's a well cropped screencap with justification for being a acreencap, I approve
I can't ficurd out what unit of measurement would be most appropriate for this comment
I think you just spent like 2-3% of my battery
put short, experiments are significantly more advantageous to the company when they are behind closed doors.
tending towards ignorance or flat out misunderstanding of recent technological advancements 4/4
if the public (and the politicians) are concerned about safety. this is exacerbated by the fact that US politicians are octogenarian 3/?
Every crash right now is heavily scrutinized, by 3rd parties but also by them, because the legislation is not going to go through 2/?
Tesla's most important goal at the moment is getting legislature in support of EVs and self-driving vehicles. 1/?
other sensors would be able to set the record right.
definitely possible but a well designed system would have redundant and independent systems so that if one sensor has a false reading, 1/2
Telemetry is collected for exactly this kind of scenario so that they can cover their ass and show empirically if it was driver error.
telemetry, in this case, is not collected for experimentation. It is not in Tesla's selfish interests to be experimenting with consumers 1/2
this is pretty close to being a heckin cool infographic
Before means they have caused it.
username checks out
aye but if you ask someone from the north about 100F they'd prefer it over 100C
and you can point at the sky and say "that one is mine"
those websites that you can buy a star from so you get a certificate that says "you own this star"
plus, studios have tons of loopholes to underreport the profits and fuck over individuals being paid this way.
fucked over WB? an individual fucked over a major film distributor? sounds a little bootlicky
Seeing the WIP screenshot, my brain first said "kiss ducks" before realizing "love birds" was an option
on the baseball-batting spectrum, it's more like responding with yelling "hey, whatch where you're going!" than batting.
of the company is not the 10/10 on the spectrum of responses. sure, you can do things smaller, but it can also be a lot bigger.
So what if it has negative consequences? Why should you support them if they do not reciprocate? And regardless, saying the name
you GENUINELY believe that those things are similar?
oh, so making the name of a company that wronged you public is equivalent in severity to beating a person with a bat, for bumping you?
ahh, the ol' slippery slope take
(obligatory IANAL)
an argument could probably be made for defamation, but not copyright infringement
it's transformative and clear parody
it's a well cropped screencap with justification for being a acreencap, I approve
I can't ficurd out what unit of measurement would be most appropriate for this comment
I think you just spent like 2-3% of my battery
put short, experiments are significantly more advantageous to the company when they are behind closed doors.
tending towards ignorance or flat out misunderstanding of recent technological advancements 4/4
if the public (and the politicians) are concerned about safety. this is exacerbated by the fact that US politicians are octogenarian 3/?
Every crash right now is heavily scrutinized, by 3rd parties but also by them, because the legislation is not going to go through 2/?
Tesla's most important goal at the moment is getting legislature in support of EVs and self-driving vehicles. 1/?
other sensors would be able to set the record right.
definitely possible but a well designed system would have redundant and independent systems so that if one sensor has a false reading, 1/2
Telemetry is collected for exactly this kind of scenario so that they can cover their ass and show empirically if it was driver error.
telemetry, in this case, is not collected for experimentation. It is not in Tesla's selfish interests to be experimenting with consumers 1/2
this is pretty close to being a heckin cool infographic
Before means they have caused it.
username checks out
aye but if you ask someone from the north about 100F they'd prefer it over 100C
and you can point at the sky and say "that one is mine"
those websites that you can buy a star from so you get a certificate that says "you own this star"
plus, studios have tons of loopholes to underreport the profits and fuck over individuals being paid this way.
fucked over WB? an individual fucked over a major film distributor? sounds a little bootlicky
Seeing the WIP screenshot, my brain first said "kiss ducks" before realizing "love birds" was an option
on the baseball-batting spectrum, it's more like responding with yelling "hey, whatch where you're going!" than batting.
of the company is not the 10/10 on the spectrum of responses. sure, you can do things smaller, but it can also be a lot bigger.
So what if it has negative consequences? Why should you support them if they do not reciprocate? And regardless, saying the name
you GENUINELY believe that those things are similar?
oh, so making the name of a company that wronged you public is equivalent in severity to beating a person with a bat, for bumping you?
ahh, the ol' slippery slope take
(obligatory IANAL)
an argument could probably be made for defamation, but not copyright infringement
it's transformative and clear parody