fuck yeah

Nov 21, 2021 2:41 AM

piconuke

Views

203811

Likes

4116

Dislikes

72

“Twins” apparently made de Vito and Schwarzenegger rich in the same manner

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How much did she get paid after, though?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Even if she was. That Industry is based on someones self worth. You chose how much you are worth and willing to work for.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, Henry Cavill is a bigger name and better actor, so him earning more seems reasonable to me.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 9

Neither of these two things are enough to debunk or confirm the pay gap

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

Thinking about how much these people get paid makes me want to throw up.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The pay gap being perpetuated by misleading numbers and statistics? Why I never... /s

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

See also mark Hamil and Harrison ford for star wars

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

OK: what cut is she getting?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

For how mediocre she is as an actress, id be okay with her getting paid less. Just my unpopular opinion.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Why do we people argue over entertainers making more money in one movie than some people will make in their lifetime?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Alec Guinness also negotiated for royalties in his Star Wars contract. Made a bunch of money

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

oh look *more* shitty ragebait on imgur - can we please stop upvoting this garbage

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Imgur is all about gut reaction emotional political activism. They want likes for their shitty political positions.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Sketchy "Hollywood accounting" makes it really hard to transparently validate this stuff. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_accounting

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which is surely a main factor in why misinformation about it is easy to spread. That, plus NDAs and other contractually sealed lips.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And this is why Scar Jo is pissed the fuck off. Because they said they'd pay her the theatre profits and proceed to not release it properly.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You know how companies do accounting so that they don't make a profit to be taxed? Movie companies do the same to avoid paying actors.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So for example, it's also men's fault when a woman has either a shitty agent or manager and/or business sense / negotiation skills? ?‍♂️

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Don't forget Nicholson raking in 90 million off Batman in the same way. Also happened to be a WB film.

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

DeVito asked Nicholson for advice when he was approached for Batman Returns; Nicholson's response was, "Try to get the deal I got."

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I remember Connery got offered some INSANE cut (like 15% of box?) To play Gandalf and turned it down because he didn't understand it.

4 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

I think the Gandalf we got worked out quite well tbh.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That may be a payday regret for him, but its good he didnt take the role only for the pay and not know how portray the role. Better for us

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

He also turned down Dumbledore in HP because he didn't understand it either...

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Maybe he had the wrong kind of wizard in mind?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And after seeing what a mistake it was, he jumped on League of Extraordinary Gentlemen out of fear he would miss out again.

4 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Knowing which movies to star in and hoping to make it big is the same as stocks for poor people.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And then he quit acting forever after that.

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Pretty sad. LXG was not the best movie, but I enjoyed it.

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

"Moichendising!" -- Mel Brooks, Space Balls.

4 years ago | Likes 840 Dislikes 4

-Yogurt

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Spaceballs" - The Comment

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yet he wasn't allowed to merchandise Space Balls

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Still waiting on Spaceballs 2 - The Soych for More Money.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

Man, I would devour some cheese balls rn

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yoghurt the wise

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Yogurt the All-powerful!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yoghurt the magnificent!!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

' that's where the real-money is made, '

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

That's how Lucas made it big!

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

You da man Fuckweasel.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

v

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

It’s how Alec Guinness made his fortune from Star Wars. $3M in salary, $100M in points & residuals.

4 years ago | Likes 151 Dislikes 0

Saved me from making this comment.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

[David Prowse nodding amusedly]

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*Sir Alec Guiness

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Quite correct & a class act

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Genuine class

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Kind of how George Lucas made his fortune from Star Wars too. Studio got the movie revenue and he the toy money.

4 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 1

You have to admit though. The idea of a giant toy franchise from that first movie sounds absurd without hindsight.

4 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

There's a great docu series on Netflix called The Toys That Made US w/an amazing episode on SW. It was a crazy longshot that hit big

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I say that having been born in 1974 and a kid during the height of the toy craze. I loved them, but I imagine what execs may have thought.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Keanu made $35M off the Matrix, NOT a quarter billion. Hell, the move only made about $460M, you think they gave him a ~60% back-end deal?

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Just remember to negotiate for a portion of the gross and not the net, that’s how David Prowse got fucked over for Star Wars.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Seems weird calling it the net when his portion still has to come out of it to be honest, but I'm no financial wiz.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I learned this as a child: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHL91HQzhuc

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I think George Lucas did a similar thing, with all the toys and lunchboxes and stuff.. I think they regretted this very quickly.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The studio had no faith in the film. Merchandising wasn’t a thing then so he was able to negotiate keeping the merch and sequels rights.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nobody saw Star Wars being a hit. Before release, Fox had to Force cinemas to screen it by bundling it with a more highly anticipated film.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

An erotic thriller who almost no one now has even heard of, let alone remembers.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lucas made very little on the original toys, which is why the prequels came so much later, so he could change the toy contract.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dawn Welles (Mary Ann) did this for Gilligan's Island. Only cast member who got residuals decades later.

4 years ago | Likes 1411 Dislikes 3

So, drop dead gorgeous and smart as a whip... got it.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

this makes the Ginger vs Mary Ann choice a bit easier

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

It was always an easy choice; sweet cornfed spinner Mary Ann…

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Probably one reason she lived so long

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I started to tell that story and you beat me to it.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I believe Jerry Seinfeld is the only one getting residuals from Seinfeld for the same reason. None of the others thought to do it

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Those poor people.

4 years ago | Likes 269 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 6

4 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 2

A ship. Only this big. A clever ruse!

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

fucked over WB? an individual fucked over a major film distributor? sounds a little bootlicky

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

Agree. He's taking a percentage of the profits. It only costs them because they're making so much money.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

plus, studios have tons of loopholes to underreport the profits and fuck over individuals being paid this way.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah phrasing it as if he screwed them somehow is just ridiculous. Oh, no, they got slightly less money from their huge commercial success.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I honestly don't care about actor,/actress salaries, they make more acting one role than a regular person does working proper, exhausting >

4 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 6

It's a highly competitive field. For each popular actor/actress, who knows how many failed to make end meets in the industry.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Jobs for a decade or a lifetime. Hollywood actors are some of the most overrated people of our time.

4 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 4

Yet they generate wealth for the studios, more than they are paid.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 25

well, usually at least

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

So do most professionals.

4 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

Who the fuck do you think built your 3000 dollar smart phone and everything else in your life?

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

Someone who can't act.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Was it Henry Cavill?

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

With all the PC building, he's too busy to make any phones.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I think the pay gap is a bigger issue with the crewmembers who make a lot less money.

4 years ago | Likes 735 Dislikes 23

So..... he's playing himself......?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I'd pay to see this "Sound Guy" myself: https://youtu.be/1ojcUwSlEHk

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah. Trade unions always pay well. I hate when people use their Krogers union or some shit as example of all unions being bad

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

I need more John Wick Figurines.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I feel like many of them make a solid living. I think a lot of them are in a union

4 years ago | Likes 104 Dislikes 4

Some, but not all. Source: me

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

On large pictures like that most of them are but there is a lot of shady shit where there are also a lot of non union people.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think it can vary, you're probably right in most cases

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Depends on the union. Have you all not hear of the almost IATSE strike in the US? Would have shut down industry (I'm Canadian, support!)

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Movie crews often work 12-16 hour days. Shit is nuts.

4 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

The only issue those dudes have with is it is when we can't make triple time.. bitch I just worked 18 hours, 8 days in a row,1/2

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why only give me time? At some point just make it triple time and lay me my dues for giving my life sway

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That's nothing dude I worked a full 60 hour in one day

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Member of IATSE here: the union provides a bottom line so we can't be COMPLETELY boned by production. Not always proportional to labor.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

On the one hand, a good union salary is nothing to turn your nose at. On the other, that one role nets Keanu enough that a single person >

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

> getting it could live off the interest from it and never need to work another day in their life. And that's every year.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sure, you spread out the royalties to all the people on a credit roll, and it won't be that big of a deal, but it won't be nothing either.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

(and that's before we talk about how much bank the executives are walking away with that should be split, too.)

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Until hollywood moves production to Canada to avoid guild mandated rates. Hollywood execs are as bad as 1% CEOs and it needs to stop

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

IATSE operates in Canada as well. They go to Eastern Europe for that

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Supernatural, The Boys, Handmaiden’s Tale, Star Trek Discovery, Umbrella Academy, all taking advantage of their crews and not paying fairly

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Tell me you don't know how film crews work without telling me you don't know how film crews work.

4 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 45

Go the fuck back to Twitter along with that phrase or learn how to not be a cunt to people who may be unsure about a thing.

4 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 12

If you're unsure about a thing, then Shut the Everloving Fuck Up until you know more. Or maybe consider ASKING, instead of Declaring.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 19

He's not wrong about the statement vs question when unsure thing. It's how a lot of misinformation gets spread here.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Union or not, you get industry rates, and ESPECIALLY in union gigs, you get screwed in favor of seniority pretty much always.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 31

You don't get benefits, you don't get coverage for health or in many cases even accidents on the worksite, no workman's comp...

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 27

... You often get screwed out of any unemployment at all because you're a contractor, and once shooting wraps? You're out of luck.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 22

That's illegal, so there's no way that's union work. Shady under the table work, maybe, but no contract can exempt you from workman's comp.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Maybe slightly, but also, it isn't the crew members that are bringing audiences to the theatres.... Maybe a little 0.01% of the cut for each

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

Member would be good, on top of their salary, and them just scale back exec. Salaries.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I mean, they are bringing the audience in, just less noticeably. Can’t have a movie without actors, but also not without props, cameras, etc

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Yes, but an actor normally also doubles as an advertising piece via socials and what not. That is normally paid with the main contract. 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/2 The crew is very important and deserves more pay for sure, but a mediocre crew with an A-list actor will make more than the reverse.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tbf the people i know who work behind the scenes in Film or TV earn good money, if they make it through the first couple of years.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Unless they get shot and killed

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

True, but the people I'm thinking of do daytime telly in the UK or a shiny floor show on a weekend.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even low paid crew are on $45ph and you get paid to wait most of the time…plus meals. Most are stoked to do it instead of live or theatre

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Lol sorry guys, should have maybe commented ‘the wage gap between America & the rest of the developed world is the issue’

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What does that mean that Americans get paid more or less? Because both are true depending on where you're looking

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In Cali and when on set maybe but in Georgia in the construction department the lowest wage is $27.23 nothing to scoff at sure but we also

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Don't "wait around" considering we have to build the sets and alter them up to the day of filming since directors like to change their mind

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So, doing what you are paid for is bad?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not at all but saying everyone in the film business makes 45$ an hour and waits around all day is massively wrong, I enjoy my job but 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This wage is incorrect. Far from incorrect.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Am I super bad at reading but is one of these meant to be 'correct'?

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Far from correct. Apologies. 45/hour for entrance employees? As if. I work in the industry. You're lucky if it's 20,/hour.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No one goes to the movie to see one of the 500 CGI guys who worked on the Matrix, they paid to see the top billed cast.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 11

Tbh most people go cause it looks cool. I think a smaller subset than one thinks goes cause "omg steve popular" is in it. Depends on genre

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Yeah, can't think of a single movie I've gone to see because I wanted to see the actor specifically. Definitely some who do care though.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

More artistic actors I do do that for. I've watched movies I otherwise wouldn't have because of the cast, and I knew they would be good

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Performances. Al Pacino, RDJ, Sam Jackson, Denzel Washington, Val Kilmer, and Leo Decaprio for examples

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nobody is dropping $20 to go to the theatre because Phil Smith was the lead gaffer on the latest Marvel flick. You draw money, you make it.

4 years ago | Likes 98 Dislikes 7

Tell a good story and do it well and your cast doesn’t need to be known. Star Wars is a prime example. Beyond obiwan, they were all unknown

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And I say this having a friend who is a gaffer...and lives waaaay better than I do.

4 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

Phil Smith is the GOAT and how dare you besmirch his name

4 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

I dunno man Philip Dunn has been making mad waves recently...

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The phil smith action from black widow is awesome.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And films with inept crews, made poorly, will bomb and be ridiculed. Vfx artists have been shat on for years despite being "important"

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm not even sure what a gaffer is.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Department Head of Electrical. They are usually the DP/DOP right hand.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not to be confused with a FLUFFER

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Thats the person who blowdries malamutes. Dont mistake that for a STUFFER tho!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They're electricians. They set up lights, etc.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Aka, the people they forgot to hire for the first season of STD.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also decent writers, actors and script supervisors

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean, Keanu probably took that option because he, too, thought it would result in lower pay.

4 years ago | Likes 229 Dislikes 24

So should I ask Keanu to give me money to pay for college?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would have liked to see that contract. Ppl. working on StarWars never saw a penny from the surplus. Those movies never account a surplus.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He’s such a nice guy - didn’t he not donate some of his pay to the support staff? (I read that - validate my if need be)

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Double negative =O

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not real.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

So people lie on the internet?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Keanu has immortal money.

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Probably the only person who if he became a Billionaire the internet wouldn't roast hardcore for being a Billionaire

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I like to think that if he broke that amount, he'd find a way to spread it out to as many people as he could.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This. He already gave a bunch of his matrix earnings to other movie staff. He knows he'd never spend the money in several lifetimes.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There's movie with the credit "Oprah Noodlemantra as Johnny Depp" except that it's actually Depp playing himself because SAG rules said/1

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

George Harrison used to do this, too. Just before he died, he was credited on a record as Rip DuMort.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He'd have to charge some minimum amount if he used his SAG name based on how much he's made previously, but it was a tiny movie that/2

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

couldn't afford even the minimum. So he made up a new name.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I was thinking of LA Without a Map, where he plays the poster for Dead Man coming alive.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Huh? Why would Keanu purposefully want lower pay?

4 years ago | Likes 87 Dislikes 3

So he can continue taking the train and bus.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He's also given some of his pay directly to other crew members. I believe he gave the VFX artists of the Matrix a good chunk each

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

There's some pics floating around of him gifting watches to John wick ppl. I think the stunt crew?

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

For the matrix he bought the stunt crew each a motorcycle.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

He's immortal. He doesn't really need the money.

4 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

Why not? Immortal people gotta eat too.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do they? I guess it depends on the immortality clause they have.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because he is a decent human being and legit tries to help people.

4 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 15

He also takes pay cuts to get better actors like with Devils Advocate as the other guy said. Took a pay cut and got Al Pacino

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

But he donates so much to charities and to movie staff. Wouldnt it be better to want him to have more money to do those things?

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

The way he does it works for him, why not keep at it?

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I was wondering why he (or anyone) would go against their own interests by going for less pay. Not trying to tell him how to live his life

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't think saving the movie studio money is helping people. The studio usually has enough money.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

If he saves the studio money, they can spend more of the movie budget on staffers and other actors.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They can but they don't always do so

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0