TheBroble

16139 pts ยท June 29, 2013


Better should check da broble, make sure das OK.

Well take castro, lenin, and trotsky off the list and I agree.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah stalin pretty much ruined communist optics forever. Now we punish countries for trying to change even if we have nothing to do with it.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Not just the environment but the workers being incredibly mistreated. Though that happens on in the vegetable industry as well.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

That's why I said they use representatives. The employees would elect people per department to represent them.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why should a janitor have no say? If you're using someone's labor they deserve a say no matter what.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because your risk means nothing without their effort put in to build your brand. They are sacrificing their time for you.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

humanity.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

fair for the people spending the majority of their week working for you to be a bigger part of the company then I feel bad for your lack of

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It also motivates people because they feel more attached to the company instead of an expendable cog in a machine. If you don't think it's

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

matters. These people who actually work in house and understand what goes on. And everyone owns a stake similar to how walmart used to do.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Picture it this way: instead of a board of directors making decisions your workers would have representatives who come together and vote on

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ok but without your workers there would be no house. You need them more than they need you. And it would be their house too ideally.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because it gives your workers more control over matters concerning their livelihood and goes leagues toward prevention exploitation.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Socialism isn't economic equality, it's where the workers collectively own the businesses they work for after working there for so long.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Happened to my friend, he passed in November and none of us could see him in his last days. At least his parents were there.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Seeing more of the world is one of the most valuable things for anyone.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I'd argue that it's easier now to stage a general strike though.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

take the means of production then it will crumble. There aren't many beaurocratic ways to reach socialism. Too many ways to prevent it.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Our system is designed to keep us down and make money for those on top. If we stop making them money it will crumble. If we ban together and

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lack of class consciousness. People relate to billionaires for some reason. If the working class acted together we could do it easily.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I was just correcting the guy in this comment, your post isn't wrong. The idea of socialism was created to better the live's of everyone

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Socialism is the workers owning the means of production, not the state.

5 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 3

Democrats aren't on the left though, unfortunately. Check out a political spectrum map of our country it's scary.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Now I'm not mechanic but I'm pretty sure there isn't supposed to be anything between the compression points of a spring.

5 years ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 0

What? Communism is a stateless and moneyless society. Ussr was most certainly not stateless. Vietnam has a state and money.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Well no one has achieved true communism because authoritarian asshats take advantage of the transition period, and outside influence.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

He can't acknowledge fdr cause fdr had some progressive ideas.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Rowling exploited book manufacturers at all levels, plus the people working at the theme park etc.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'd say not many do because it's significantly harder. Even jk rowling arguably exploited the people who manufacture the physical books.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

How many average people do you think own stocks? That's not even close to the only way rich people get richer my friend.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1