116 pts · October 21, 2012
You can still flush the turd
Yes but then how do you know which way to go?
Yep
No, those sorts of studies present data and interpretation. Not causation.
“Nerve-wracking” is a widely-used and well-established variant spelling
Nah-you're right. No the entire rationalist movement of colonialism must have been retarded. Lucky we don't use it as medical foundation.
I mean, maybe it's been mischaracterised then? Likely used as justification for sleeping with them when the society was looking down on that
A brilliant scheme to reduce the amount of those people by procreating with them. A punchline to be sure.
Yep okay that's fair, although i would note the relatively small n values that they had for those therapies in the metaanalysis. I apologise
An unreferenced screenshot from Netflix is not a peer reviewed study. Primary sauce please
Sauce? You liar.
Pick a femenine fragrance to appeal to other people.
Get fucked buddy.
Different varieties of doritos doesn't count.
Lots of things are easy.
It's an ad.
Am I watching astroturfing?
Deleted comment stated something along the lines of "she didn't cheat, look after your child" ignoring the conceit of the hypothetical.
WAT
Reading turns investigators into prostitutes.
That's right. People can commit fraud. Which is also illegal, just report and sue, if you can reasonably explain your case it's payday.
You can still flush the turd
Yes but then how do you know which way to go?
Yep
No, those sorts of studies present data and interpretation. Not causation.
“Nerve-wracking” is a widely-used and well-established variant spelling
Nah-you're right. No the entire rationalist movement of colonialism must have been retarded. Lucky we don't use it as medical foundation.
I mean, maybe it's been mischaracterised then? Likely used as justification for sleeping with them when the society was looking down on that
A brilliant scheme to reduce the amount of those people by procreating with them. A punchline to be sure.
Yep okay that's fair, although i would note the relatively small n values that they had for those therapies in the metaanalysis. I apologise
An unreferenced screenshot from Netflix is not a peer reviewed study. Primary sauce please
Sauce? You liar.
Pick a femenine fragrance to appeal to other people.
Get fucked buddy.
Different varieties of doritos doesn't count.
Lots of things are easy.
It's an ad.
Am I watching astroturfing?
Deleted comment stated something along the lines of "she didn't cheat, look after your child" ignoring the conceit of the hypothetical.
WAT
Reading turns investigators into prostitutes.
That's right. People can commit fraud. Which is also illegal, just report and sue, if you can reasonably explain your case it's payday.