370332 pts ยท February 5, 2012
So you guys are in favor of deportations now?
I don't think a baby can be a mama.
I've asked that plenty of times before, and I always get "by taxing them". It's circular logic. And then when I say "the rich avoid paying taxes, so what good will taxing them do?", the answer is always "You're nazi" or "You're a bootlicker." There's never any reasoning, only an unreasonable "solution".
If that were the case, we wouldn't see taxes raising across the board, correct? Oh wait, we do. Also, I always see everyone talking about taxing the wealthy, but never how they're going to tax the wealthy, which leaves 2 questions - 1. What good is taxing the wealthy if they already avoid taxes, and 2. With how inefficient the government is with tax spending, how do you imagine the taxes will actually help anyone? You want to give more money to a government that is almost $40 trillion in debt?
No, it's not a "No you" situation. I stated and addressable point in my original comment. This AGAIN is a situation of you blaming me for exactly what you're doing. 0 for 2 bud.
You obviously didn't read my original comment.
I have about 15 different threads going on, and in this thread, you hadn't provided any argument nor policy. But either way, you're ignoring my points just as much as I'm ignoring yours, so it's very hypocritical of you for calling me out on something you are just as guilty of.
Ah, so as long as the wealthy are wealthy, we should attack them, even if it damages the poor? What a concept. That's the exact point I was trying to make in my original comment. Thank you for proving me right.
I just checked, and you haven't provided 1 actual argument nor policy in this thread. All you've done is blamed me for what you're guilty of. You're either delusional, or a liar.
What facts are you talking about? I'd love to hear them.
Blaming me for what you're doing is hardly a respectable way to argue. C'mon kiddo. Do better.
Same to you, bud.
I have asked that, and that's why it amazes me that people actually want that.
So you're saying high taxes aren't a problem for middle or lower class anywhere in America right now?
Nope, I'm just stating what everyone already knows but refuses to accept.
Probably god, if he actually exists.
How can it be a strawman when you don't have an argument in the first place? Do you not know what a strawman is?
Thank you for proving that I'm correct. Anyway, whenever you no longer want to destroy America's middle and lower class, let me know.
And you'd win that bet.
I do realize how absurd it is. That's why I'm complaining about it. Do you not realize how absurd it is?
People like me? Expand on that (I love this part). Also, if you're poor, and taxes go up, it still hurts, even if you don't pay much in taxes. It amazes me how blind/ignorant leftists are to how much taxation hurts the poor.
Oh, so now hatred is only allowed to be felt and applied by certain classes of people? What an awful bigot you are.
I don't understand why they do that either. I also don't understand what that has to do with what we're talking about.
Ignorant and hypocritical. A very unsurprising combination.
Only to the ignorant.
Ah, then you're just trolling me.
Do you live under a rock?
There's that non-hate again. And what do you mean "you guys"? Which group are you lumping me into? (this is my favorite part)
I haven't stated any right-wing talking points. Right-wingers are just as fucked as left-wingers. Well, they seem a bit more fucked up lately than left-wingers, but that doesn't make left-wingers any less fucked up than they already are. And I agree that "You can't propose a solution that immediately solves 100% of all problems, so we should do nothing" is a weird take. I'm glad that's not what I'm saying. And the solutions you listed are cool to say, but they're opposite of what actually occurs
Ah, so asking me to seriously injure myself is not hate? Is that how leftists show love? It doesn't surprise me. Also, your last sentence pretty much states "Anyone who disagrees with me is not worthy of respect". What a great stance to take. It really invites free-thinkers, doesn't it?
So you guys are in favor of deportations now?
I don't think a baby can be a mama.
I've asked that plenty of times before, and I always get "by taxing them". It's circular logic. And then when I say "the rich avoid paying taxes, so what good will taxing them do?", the answer is always "You're nazi" or "You're a bootlicker." There's never any reasoning, only an unreasonable "solution".
If that were the case, we wouldn't see taxes raising across the board, correct? Oh wait, we do. Also, I always see everyone talking about taxing the wealthy, but never how they're going to tax the wealthy, which leaves 2 questions - 1. What good is taxing the wealthy if they already avoid taxes, and 2. With how inefficient the government is with tax spending, how do you imagine the taxes will actually help anyone? You want to give more money to a government that is almost $40 trillion in debt?
No, it's not a "No you" situation. I stated and addressable point in my original comment. This AGAIN is a situation of you blaming me for exactly what you're doing. 0 for 2 bud.
You obviously didn't read my original comment.
I have about 15 different threads going on, and in this thread, you hadn't provided any argument nor policy. But either way, you're ignoring my points just as much as I'm ignoring yours, so it's very hypocritical of you for calling me out on something you are just as guilty of.
Ah, so as long as the wealthy are wealthy, we should attack them, even if it damages the poor? What a concept. That's the exact point I was trying to make in my original comment. Thank you for proving me right.
I just checked, and you haven't provided 1 actual argument nor policy in this thread. All you've done is blamed me for what you're guilty of. You're either delusional, or a liar.
What facts are you talking about? I'd love to hear them.
Blaming me for what you're doing is hardly a respectable way to argue. C'mon kiddo. Do better.
Same to you, bud.
I have asked that, and that's why it amazes me that people actually want that.
So you're saying high taxes aren't a problem for middle or lower class anywhere in America right now?
Nope, I'm just stating what everyone already knows but refuses to accept.
Probably god, if he actually exists.
How can it be a strawman when you don't have an argument in the first place? Do you not know what a strawman is?
Thank you for proving that I'm correct. Anyway, whenever you no longer want to destroy America's middle and lower class, let me know.
And you'd win that bet.
I do realize how absurd it is. That's why I'm complaining about it. Do you not realize how absurd it is?
People like me? Expand on that (I love this part). Also, if you're poor, and taxes go up, it still hurts, even if you don't pay much in taxes. It amazes me how blind/ignorant leftists are to how much taxation hurts the poor.
Oh, so now hatred is only allowed to be felt and applied by certain classes of people? What an awful bigot you are.
I don't understand why they do that either. I also don't understand what that has to do with what we're talking about.
Ignorant and hypocritical. A very unsurprising combination.
Only to the ignorant.
Ah, then you're just trolling me.
Do you live under a rock?
There's that non-hate again. And what do you mean "you guys"? Which group are you lumping me into? (this is my favorite part)
I haven't stated any right-wing talking points. Right-wingers are just as fucked as left-wingers. Well, they seem a bit more fucked up lately than left-wingers, but that doesn't make left-wingers any less fucked up than they already are. And I agree that "You can't propose a solution that immediately solves 100% of all problems, so we should do nothing" is a weird take. I'm glad that's not what I'm saying. And the solutions you listed are cool to say, but they're opposite of what actually occurs
Ah, so asking me to seriously injure myself is not hate? Is that how leftists show love? It doesn't surprise me. Also, your last sentence pretty much states "Anyone who disagrees with me is not worthy of respect". What a great stance to take. It really invites free-thinkers, doesn't it?