42415 pts · November 4, 2014
I'm here for cute animals, I swear
We already have Jewish space lasers being touted by major politicians, so anti-grav cannons are really just par for the course now.
dude just got manhandled and yeeted like a lopsided frisbee by the scruff of his neck. It's gonna take him a few minutes to realize which way is up again
that'd be a coup, and we'd be fascist state.
are you her doctor? If the answer is no, you have no idea why she's that heavy or whether she's already working to address it.
"easily" isn't an object when anything can and will be twisted. The answer is an easy yes.
"Reform" was the term for decades and it never got anywhere, the only reason the discussion happened at all was because of the new words, it was otherwise doomed to being ignored forever.
downvote and move on folks, don't feed the troll, they thrive on the reaction they get
why would you assume it? And even if they agree, are they actively pushing and pursuing it, or idly waiting for the chance to vote on the matter? This is how a representative democracy works, not by passively assume people you voted for will somehow know what and how much you want them to do to work towards a particular end.
It's easy to pin that on the democrats, but when the people don't feel confident in the economy, which is currently the case, the incumbent party is almost guaranteed to lose regardless of who or what is responsible.
Nah, you don't get to turn threats of rape into a slogan and expect the world to respect the social contract that affords you privacy even as you do your best to inject yourself into the public sphere.
supply and demand isn't applicable in the sale of a product where sales do not deplete the supply, there is no scarcity in the sale of digital goods
it's about how white the perpetrator is relative to the victim. If Trayvon Martin had been a white teen, or even a white Latino teen, the trial would have been an entirely different story
I mean, the claim is about what happened in their relationship amd divorce, why does it matter who did the interview? for that matter what other publication would even care to broach this topic?
You're misrepresenting the evidence you were given and claiming to quote it."The philanthropist addressed their divorce publicly for the first time in a new interview with Gayle King that aired on CBS This Morning on Thursday, explaining that it was “not one thing but many things” that led to the demise of their marriage."It's not the singular reason for the divorce, but it's still part of it.
My first thought was it was referencing trump's "the enemy within" rhetoric until I read the third line, so maybe?
nice quote ya got there with "it", but maybe try to find some evidence that uses more than a single quoted word to prove your claim, I think you'll find it harder to spin that way, though.
I expect the stickler for proper English writing conventions not to immediately make such mistakes. That's irony.
#22 Pouring maple syrup or honey on someone sounds sexy, but you're playing a risky game. Best case scenario, your lover is enthusiastic enough get you mostly clean, and you'll get to enjoy just being sticky AF till you thoroughly bathe. Worst case scenario, it crystalizes, and you either soak in hot water for the next day to loosen it up or enjoy a surprise waxing. Bonus to the wax method, you also get to keep the hair-filled honey strips.
whats the point of responding to something if you're just going to pretend it said something it didn't? And it's not devil's advocacy if I believe what I'm saying. They didn't describe being surprised by the head-covering requirement, and it's not even the thing they focused on.
This is peak irony
again, you're projecting assumptions. Nowhere do they indicate surprise. Disgust and disapproval are described, and whatever led them to be there that day has no bearing on it. Would it be better to complain from the position of having never been there, and thus *assuming* all these things about the place out of ignorance?
you assumed it was on vacation yourself, just cause they toured a mosque doesn't necessarily mean they weren't there for other reasons.
Its also going to depend on circumstances. Kids who are excited, hungry, angry or tired are less likely to have that moment of self-reflection between seeing something they want to do and going through with it. Kids are also just, *different* from eachother, just like adults. Some kids, and adults, have less impulse control than others, so learning to control those desires may be harder.
If the meaning is clearly discernable, responding to the structure of the statement instead of the content is just a thinly veiled attempt at dismissing a point you're unable to refute.
correcting people with pointless and subjective technicalities is a perfect match for your energy, but apparently you don't have the self-awareness to see it
Has getting agitated at people for matching your energy started to trigger some kind of reflection yet? Or should I keep going?
I can literally set 20 alarms for myself and wake up 4 hours after all of them should have gone off with no memory of being woken up or disabling the other 19.
does bottling it up and getting killed by it at a later date over a longer, slower period count as a better outcome?
only applicable if you can afford the fare and the time off, and only if you don't live in a state that will try to hold you legally liable for leaving to do just that.you're so privileged you can't even grasp the possibility that such a thing is still prohibitively expensive for huge swathes of the country, and just to get medical care that should always be available.
We already have Jewish space lasers being touted by major politicians, so anti-grav cannons are really just par for the course now.
dude just got manhandled and yeeted like a lopsided frisbee by the scruff of his neck. It's gonna take him a few minutes to realize which way is up again
that'd be a coup, and we'd be fascist state.
are you her doctor? If the answer is no, you have no idea why she's that heavy or whether she's already working to address it.
"easily" isn't an object when anything can and will be twisted. The answer is an easy yes.
"Reform" was the term for decades and it never got anywhere, the only reason the discussion happened at all was because of the new words, it was otherwise doomed to being ignored forever.
downvote and move on folks, don't feed the troll, they thrive on the reaction they get
why would you assume it? And even if they agree, are they actively pushing and pursuing it, or idly waiting for the chance to vote on the matter? This is how a representative democracy works, not by passively assume people you voted for will somehow know what and how much you want them to do to work towards a particular end.
It's easy to pin that on the democrats, but when the people don't feel confident in the economy, which is currently the case, the incumbent party is almost guaranteed to lose regardless of who or what is responsible.
Nah, you don't get to turn threats of rape into a slogan and expect the world to respect the social contract that affords you privacy even as you do your best to inject yourself into the public sphere.
supply and demand isn't applicable in the sale of a product where sales do not deplete the supply, there is no scarcity in the sale of digital goods
it's about how white the perpetrator is relative to the victim. If Trayvon Martin had been a white teen, or even a white Latino teen, the trial would have been an entirely different story
I mean, the claim is about what happened in their relationship amd divorce, why does it matter who did the interview? for that matter what other publication would even care to broach this topic?
You're misrepresenting the evidence you were given and claiming to quote it.
"The philanthropist addressed their divorce publicly for the first time in a new interview with Gayle King that aired on CBS This Morning on Thursday, explaining that it was “not one thing but many things” that led to the demise of their marriage."
It's not the singular reason for the divorce, but it's still part of it.
My first thought was it was referencing trump's "the enemy within" rhetoric until I read the third line, so maybe?
nice quote ya got there with "it", but maybe try to find some evidence that uses more than a single quoted word to prove your claim, I think you'll find it harder to spin that way, though.
I expect the stickler for proper English writing conventions not to immediately make such mistakes. That's irony.
#22 Pouring maple syrup or honey on someone sounds sexy, but you're playing a risky game. Best case scenario, your lover is enthusiastic enough get you mostly clean, and you'll get to enjoy just being sticky AF till you thoroughly bathe. Worst case scenario, it crystalizes, and you either soak in hot water for the next day to loosen it up or enjoy a surprise waxing. Bonus to the wax method, you also get to keep the hair-filled honey strips.
whats the point of responding to something if you're just going to pretend it said something it didn't? And it's not devil's advocacy if I believe what I'm saying. They didn't describe being surprised by the head-covering requirement, and it's not even the thing they focused on.
This is peak irony
again, you're projecting assumptions. Nowhere do they indicate surprise. Disgust and disapproval are described, and whatever led them to be there that day has no bearing on it. Would it be better to complain from the position of having never been there, and thus *assuming* all these things about the place out of ignorance?
you assumed it was on vacation yourself, just cause they toured a mosque doesn't necessarily mean they weren't there for other reasons.
Its also going to depend on circumstances. Kids who are excited, hungry, angry or tired are less likely to have that moment of self-reflection between seeing something they want to do and going through with it. Kids are also just, *different* from eachother, just like adults. Some kids, and adults, have less impulse control than others, so learning to control those desires may be harder.
If the meaning is clearly discernable, responding to the structure of the statement instead of the content is just a thinly veiled attempt at dismissing a point you're unable to refute.
correcting people with pointless and subjective technicalities is a perfect match for your energy, but apparently you don't have the self-awareness to see it
Has getting agitated at people for matching your energy started to trigger some kind of reflection yet? Or should I keep going?
I can literally set 20 alarms for myself and wake up 4 hours after all of them should have gone off with no memory of being woken up or disabling the other 19.
does bottling it up and getting killed by it at a later date over a longer, slower period count as a better outcome?
only applicable if you can afford the fare and the time off, and only if you don't live in a state that will try to hold you legally liable for leaving to do just that.
you're so privileged you can't even grasp the possibility that such a thing is still prohibitively expensive for huge swathes of the country, and just to get medical care that should always be available.