442 pts ยท February 27, 2012
Definitely a metaphor for modern democracy
Racism kills people, and the least racist of our two political parties is about to nominate a racist for president. Pretty fucking relevant
You could think of it as going to the gym + saving a little gasoline
Yes. That's the whole damn point. Congregating in large crowds kills people during deadly pandemics. Not rocket science.
No, just the small portion of those people willing to kill millions to do it.
Only if those twerps get too close
The justice system is broken, but it's pretty good at locking up pedophiles. If the DA couldn't convict the guy, there's probably a reason.
A (long) publication on this topic: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/LSB10250.pdf
https://ecfr.io/Title-05/se5.3.2635_1102
It's not that simple. For one thing, the regulation defining "employee" in this context specifically excludes the President and VP. links:
2/2 That said, an action can be unethical even if there isn't a regulation against it. I'd say this is clearly unethical regardless.
Whether that or similar rules apply to the president is a complicated and open question. Most experts seem to believe that they do not. 1/2
This. Feminism isn't an attack on men. It's an observation that we - collectively - maintain norms that are unfair.
Remove the words "be allowed to", and I might be able to get behind this
Free after about 5 Sat and all day Sun
I'd give it a go
Moved here a few months ago
Parks and Rec really didn't rely on that sheet of humor after season 1. Great show , give it another shot
It's 5 per 10,000 stops, not 5 total. Ditto for 4. Totally unrelated to sample size.
Your comment has nothing to do with blaming law abiding gun owners
Just moved here. Seems pretty cool
The only point with any substance is that he's anti-abortion. That's a long leap to "women aren't people"
The vast majority of those articles are about one little gaffe that sounds mildly misogynistic. Total non-issue. (1/2)
And even those who are "committed" are free to change their minds whenever they want. Most will go with the popular vote
Superdelegates have never decided a nomination, and it's extremely unlikely that they'll decide this one either.
Well, that answered my question pretty succinctly
Read your post: "...if any jury in any case hears evidence the police manipulated evidence..." In what way did I misinterpret your comment?
So all a defense attorney needs to do is allege that the police manipulated evidence? We'd never convict anybody.
whether or not the jury reached a reasonable verdict. They saw a lot of evidence that we did not. 2/2
Yes, he has reasonable doubt after watching a 10-hour documentary. I don't think the show gives us enough information to determine... 1/2
Definitely a metaphor for modern democracy
Racism kills people, and the least racist of our two political parties is about to nominate a racist for president. Pretty fucking relevant
You could think of it as going to the gym + saving a little gasoline
Yes. That's the whole damn point. Congregating in large crowds kills people during deadly pandemics. Not rocket science.
No, just the small portion of those people willing to kill millions to do it.
Only if those twerps get too close
The justice system is broken, but it's pretty good at locking up pedophiles. If the DA couldn't convict the guy, there's probably a reason.
A (long) publication on this topic: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/LSB10250.pdf
https://ecfr.io/Title-05/se5.3.2635_1102
It's not that simple. For one thing, the regulation defining "employee" in this context specifically excludes the President and VP. links:
2/2 That said, an action can be unethical even if there isn't a regulation against it. I'd say this is clearly unethical regardless.
Whether that or similar rules apply to the president is a complicated and open question. Most experts seem to believe that they do not. 1/2
This. Feminism isn't an attack on men. It's an observation that we - collectively - maintain norms that are unfair.
Remove the words "be allowed to", and I might be able to get behind this
Free after about 5 Sat and all day Sun
I'd give it a go
Moved here a few months ago
Parks and Rec really didn't rely on that sheet of humor after season 1. Great show , give it another shot
It's 5 per 10,000 stops, not 5 total. Ditto for 4. Totally unrelated to sample size.
Your comment has nothing to do with blaming law abiding gun owners
Just moved here. Seems pretty cool
The only point with any substance is that he's anti-abortion. That's a long leap to "women aren't people"
The vast majority of those articles are about one little gaffe that sounds mildly misogynistic. Total non-issue. (1/2)
And even those who are "committed" are free to change their minds whenever they want. Most will go with the popular vote
Superdelegates have never decided a nomination, and it's extremely unlikely that they'll decide this one either.
Well, that answered my question pretty succinctly
Read your post: "...if any jury in any case hears evidence the police manipulated evidence..." In what way did I misinterpret your comment?
So all a defense attorney needs to do is allege that the police manipulated evidence? We'd never convict anybody.
whether or not the jury reached a reasonable verdict. They saw a lot of evidence that we did not. 2/2
Yes, he has reasonable doubt after watching a 10-hour documentary. I don't think the show gives us enough information to determine... 1/2