NoHelpAvailableOnThatTopic

218 pts · April 21, 2016


Just a hoola hoop pr'bly

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The woman crossing the street is not even looking... seems to be used to situations like that..

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Like in germany: "Wenn das der Führer wüsste.." - He fucking knew all about it!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, they misspelled Donald Drumpf too.. so what? ;)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"If firefighters fight fire and crimefighters fight crime - what do freedomfighters fight?"(George Carlin)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

'they'?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

I'm a simple man. I see George Carlin, I upvote

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Have an upvote.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Sarcasm sometimes is hard to discover... and well not all americans, but germans.. ;)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honestly, do you really think, Trump is independent? Listen to his interviews. He is just a puppet without opinions.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

That sounds very.. american.. Thanks for supporting the cliché

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 14

Not much - except for those donated by the army of iraque. Taxpayers on the other hand...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do they?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is screwed. Who is paying for weapons used by american troops?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So true..

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To think is kinda dangerous.. ya know?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

as always

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This exactly is what I just referred to."Breeder reactors could match today's nuclear output for 30,000 years "

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If you use breeder reactors, yes. These create plutonium if I'm not mistaken...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ok, I relied in german wikipedia which seems to be wrong here. But even if it lasts for more than 200 ys - we are doomed :)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

and well.. the world-komma-shortage got me. Here is a small supply, insert at will: ,,,,,,,,,,

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Then we are doomed anyway since uranium may last for maybe 60 more years.. better look for alternatives.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

This is a myth. If the billions of taxes that had been put into nuclear power had been put in alternatives we already would have them.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yup, but usually I can calculate whether I want to take a risk or not.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

But IF a reactor blews up the outcome is not worth the win you get by taking the risk in the first place

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You still miss the point. There always is a reason why THIS reactor failed and why THIS does not match any other reactor.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

of wide areas.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

3500 fissures. So shutdowns are "maintenance"? Let a common power plant crash. You get casualties and dead bodies.. but no contamination(2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Tchernobyl blew up, fukushima blew up.. the core melts, pressure gets to high and it explodes.. doesn't it? Tihange-2 officially reports (1)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

See?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4