154327 pts ยท July 18, 2022
And a mechanic to maintain those 12 cylinders
This never ends well...
Hmmmm, anyone check his papers lately?
https://ministrywatch.com/more-lawsuits-filed-against-greg-laurie-and-harvest-christian-fellowshi">ge/">https://ministrywatch.com/more-lawsuits-filed-against-greg-laurie-and-harvest-christian-fellowship-for-abuse-in-romanian-orphanage/ https://www.christianitytoday.com/2025/09/greg-laurie-calvary-chapel-negligence-abuse-lawsuit-romania/
Would you have sex with a dude that called you dude?
Truck might not have a power divider, some of them don't. Also being stopped on a uphill slope on snow and ice is a nightmare. You have to be very careful letting out the clutch or you'll spin the wheels. The early automatic transmissions were the worst, because you had no control over the speed the transmission engaged at.
The review might not be true, but the sentiment is spot on.
Still in effect, but from what I read, fewer people now keep their service weapons at home. Looks like it's still a option though
Not Switzerland. In the 1st place the militia there is equipped with the SIG SG 510, and they don't carry them openly like that. The rifle in the picture is a AK variant. The most likely location in my opinion would be Ukraine.
It is, in theory, a device that blows the snow off your car's windows and windshield and melts the frost/ice. In practice, a device that small wouldn't put out enough heat to melt a single snowflake. If it did put out that much heat, you would be in danger of cracking your glass from thermal stress.
I'm going to have to learn to type faster.
The Tome of Terror
You are correct. It is private property, so they get to decide who gets to do what on it. As ICE isn't paying any attention to the laws anymore, there isn't much Target can do to stop them, but not allowing protests on their property is a tacit approval of ICE and it's tactics. If Target is supporting ICE, I'm not supporting Target. That's the point here.
Not personally from there, but my brother lives there, and I think the state is pretty red. ICE might get a warmer welcome there. Certainly warmer than they would on Oregon.
100K for a product that would make billions, right.
Yes, but the US version will be SOOOO much better. It will be the bestest. Better than any other in history. Better than any that ever will be built. (And yes, I am well aware of what Deutsches Stadion is, and how Germans feel about it.)
Well, I don't ski, but do you really think the ski industry would have evolved if someone didn't make a profit off of it? Uncontrolled capitalism is bad, but properly used, it is a excellent tool. Europe has 1.5 million people employed directly in the industry, not to mention the people employed in manufacturing all the equipment. Do you really think communism would have ever bothered with it?
Back off! or we'll order pizza!
The point isn't camouflage, it's intimidation.
Oh I'm going to take hits for this, but they ARE just text messages. They establish that Musk WANTED to go to the island, and suggest that sex was the reason, but they don't in and of themselves constitute proof that he did so. a judge would likely allow them as evidence of intent, but it would be hard to make the leap that they constitute proof that he ever even went to the island. You understand I'm making a legal argument here, not a moral one.
#1: But its okay, we're sending ICE to Italy, where they will break into the Italian military base and find "proof".
I'm guessing this is what the DHS is basing non-compliance on. How will the courts rule if/when it goes to court? Not a clue. Even if I was a lawyer I'd probably not have a answer. The issue seems more complicated than it might appear. And there's no need to get insulting. It's not like I'm trying to justify their use of masks, I'm just pointing out the rationale they're using to flout the CA law.
As long as you accept the fact that I personally DO NOT think they should be allowed to wear masks; can you point to one that says they can't? I'm pretty sure that the lack of a specific law doesn't make a practice forbidden or illegal, only because that's not the way laws work. Keep in mind I'm not a lawyer, and I am just spitballing here.
I don't honestly know, but it sounds right. Was just posting it for informational purposes
You do understand that the point of a trial is to establish guilt and determine punishment don't you? Cause the tone of your comment makes me think you've already decided both of those issues. If that's the case, what's the point in holding a trial at all?
Well that's an easy question. More tax cuts for the rich. Why should Musky pay taxes to support this old lady? Let her go out and get a job, the slacker. I mean this is 4 billion dollar program. For that kind of money we could almost buy 1/4 of a aircraft carrier.
And a mechanic to maintain those 12 cylinders
This never ends well...
Hmmmm, anyone check his papers lately?
https://ministrywatch.com/more-lawsuits-filed-against-greg-laurie-and-harvest-christian-fellowshi">ge/">https://ministrywatch.com/more-lawsuits-filed-against-greg-laurie-and-harvest-christian-fellowship-for-abuse-in-romanian-orphanage/ https://www.christianitytoday.com/2025/09/greg-laurie-calvary-chapel-negligence-abuse-lawsuit-romania/
Would you have sex with a dude that called you dude?
Truck might not have a power divider, some of them don't. Also being stopped on a uphill slope on snow and ice is a nightmare. You have to be very careful letting out the clutch or you'll spin the wheels. The early automatic transmissions were the worst, because you had no control over the speed the transmission engaged at.
The review might not be true, but the sentiment is spot on.
Still in effect, but from what I read, fewer people now keep their service weapons at home. Looks like it's still a option though
Not Switzerland. In the 1st place the militia there is equipped with the SIG SG 510, and they don't carry them openly like that. The rifle in the picture is a AK variant. The most likely location in my opinion would be Ukraine.
It is, in theory, a device that blows the snow off your car's windows and windshield and melts the frost/ice. In practice, a device that small wouldn't put out enough heat to melt a single snowflake. If it did put out that much heat, you would be in danger of cracking your glass from thermal stress.
I'm going to have to learn to type faster.
The Tome of Terror
You are correct. It is private property, so they get to decide who gets to do what on it. As ICE isn't paying any attention to the laws anymore, there isn't much Target can do to stop them, but not allowing protests on their property is a tacit approval of ICE and it's tactics. If Target is supporting ICE, I'm not supporting Target. That's the point here.
Not personally from there, but my brother lives there, and I think the state is pretty red. ICE might get a warmer welcome there. Certainly warmer than they would on Oregon.
100K for a product that would make billions, right.
Yes, but the US version will be SOOOO much better. It will be the bestest. Better than any other in history. Better than any that ever will be built. (And yes, I am well aware of what Deutsches Stadion is, and how Germans feel about it.)
Well, I don't ski, but do you really think the ski industry would have evolved if someone didn't make a profit off of it? Uncontrolled capitalism is bad, but properly used, it is a excellent tool. Europe has 1.5 million people employed directly in the industry, not to mention the people employed in manufacturing all the equipment. Do you really think communism would have ever bothered with it?
Back off! or we'll order pizza!
The point isn't camouflage, it's intimidation.
Oh I'm going to take hits for this, but they ARE just text messages. They establish that Musk WANTED to go to the island, and suggest that sex was the reason, but they don't in and of themselves constitute proof that he did so. a judge would likely allow them as evidence of intent, but it would be hard to make the leap that they constitute proof that he ever even went to the island. You understand I'm making a legal argument here, not a moral one.
#1: But its okay, we're sending ICE to Italy, where they will break into the Italian military base and find "proof".
I'm guessing this is what the DHS is basing non-compliance on. How will the courts rule if/when it goes to court? Not a clue. Even if I was a lawyer I'd probably not have a answer. The issue seems more complicated than it might appear. And there's no need to get insulting. It's not like I'm trying to justify their use of masks, I'm just pointing out the rationale they're using to flout the CA law.
As long as you accept the fact that I personally DO NOT think they should be allowed to wear masks; can you point to one that says they can't? I'm pretty sure that the lack of a specific law doesn't make a practice forbidden or illegal, only because that's not the way laws work. Keep in mind I'm not a lawyer, and I am just spitballing here.
I don't honestly know, but it sounds right. Was just posting it for informational purposes
You do understand that the point of a trial is to establish guilt and determine punishment don't you? Cause the tone of your comment makes me think you've already decided both of those issues. If that's the case, what's the point in holding a trial at all?
Well that's an easy question. More tax cuts for the rich. Why should Musky pay taxes to support this old lady? Let her go out and get a job, the slacker. I mean this is 4 billion dollar program. For that kind of money we could almost buy 1/4 of a aircraft carrier.