9953 pts ยท March 6, 2013
#?
These were (likely) developed by Mindy Scheier! https://youtu.be/a17Z5Sk2XJY her TED talk
Squats
Was suspicious he was a doctor until the end
Wouldn't that mean it isn't always publicly accessible? Or when the shop is closed, it's not literally accessible then? So what's it about 2
What exactly does publicly accessible mean in this context though? You can still be kicked out or barred from entering a store can't you? 1)
ohhh, my bad
Birds
Burden on proof is on you man
At about 26/27s into the video you can see him on a cable
I mean, apart from a lot of other charitable things many churches and religious organisations do
No profit* and not necessarily, that's a complete non sequitur
*aside* from his origin
Isn't that exactly what you're complaining about other people not doing? (2/2)
I agree with your point, but in the end there you said you were annoyed when asked to provide proof. (1/2)
https://youtu.be/LJkBLMhXvcQ is a good tutorial for it
True, also children who are American citizens and have not done anything wrong
It's not about the parents, it's about the children
Ooo so oppressed. No one's doing that, stop being hyperbolic
Saw the username... true
Yeah it's both really, I was referring to the use of the word monopoly, but it's definitely a cartel too
It's called an oligopoly
The bible =/= god
How was FDR in office for 12.1 years??
Lots of people say so
How would less regulations prevents something like a financial crisis?
present backed up arguments from both sides? (3/3)
to get into, partly because it can lead to misinformation spreading very easily. And if OP did want to let us hear both sides, why not (2/3)
The problem is that OP is presenting something as fact without backing it up (Burden of Proof Logical fallacy) this is a bad practice (1/3)
This is so pure
#?
These were (likely) developed by Mindy Scheier! https://youtu.be/a17Z5Sk2XJY her TED talk
Squats
Was suspicious he was a doctor until the end
Wouldn't that mean it isn't always publicly accessible? Or when the shop is closed, it's not literally accessible then? So what's it about 2
What exactly does publicly accessible mean in this context though? You can still be kicked out or barred from entering a store can't you? 1)
ohhh, my bad
Birds
Burden on proof is on you man
At about 26/27s into the video you can see him on a cable
I mean, apart from a lot of other charitable things many churches and religious organisations do
No profit* and not necessarily, that's a complete non sequitur
*aside* from his origin
Isn't that exactly what you're complaining about other people not doing? (2/2)
I agree with your point, but in the end there you said you were annoyed when asked to provide proof. (1/2)
https://youtu.be/LJkBLMhXvcQ is a good tutorial for it
True, also children who are American citizens and have not done anything wrong
It's not about the parents, it's about the children
Ooo so oppressed. No one's doing that, stop being hyperbolic
Saw the username... true
Yeah it's both really, I was referring to the use of the word monopoly, but it's definitely a cartel too
It's called an oligopoly
The bible =/= god
How was FDR in office for 12.1 years??
Lots of people say so
How would less regulations prevents something like a financial crisis?
present backed up arguments from both sides? (3/3)
to get into, partly because it can lead to misinformation spreading very easily. And if OP did want to let us hear both sides, why not (2/3)
The problem is that OP is presenting something as fact without backing it up (Burden of Proof Logical fallacy) this is a bad practice (1/3)
This is so pure