71171 pts ยท May 12, 2016
Being so obviously disruptive that no reasonable person would ever go to these lengths. A normal person, especially in SC, would at most go "eh, poor taste" and move on but no you're staking your whole fucking identity on this to prove a dem nominee is a homophobe for attacking a real life demon
How are you this stupidThe ad makes reference to him being "in the closet" but about his love for war. You're the one trying to say "oh this Democrat actually hates gay people because they used a double entendre in an ad about not getting Americans killed in wars"What are you even doing, you dipshit white knight moron
This is actual CIA shit istg lmao
You know what throws races, being so sensitive about a joke that you label the dem nominee a homophobe before an election.If you're not even from here and have no interest in helping, then seriously shut the fuck up
2) then shut the fuck up
Is this embracing bigotry or is it a fuckin double entendre you're way too sensitive about
1) are gay people actually being thrown under the bus here2) do you live in South Carolina
Trolley problem: one mean implication in a political ad but a Democrat wins, or we elect a notorious closeted war hawk to drag us into more warsI feel like I know which one I'm going to pick
Oh come on lmfao
Are we more invested in policing double entendres or winning elections against some of the most evil people aliveI'm not saying you're wrong but how about we pick our battles
I encourage you to look at pretty much any political poll of US adults so you can understand how fucking stupid the median voter is and you'll see why educators are so important to the movement.
I switched to cashless once covid hit and it's almost literally paying dividends now
This ad is directed at South Carolinian voters
Fwiw it's not hard to get someone to bend their arm if it's already fully extended like that and size doesn't play much of a role there. The rest of it is either implausible or ridiculous
It's generally not a very good move because it locks up one of the arms you could be defending with and at best only partially controls someone's movement. An experienced fighter will take advantage of an entire half of your body being unguarded.
One hand against their elbow, one hand on their wrist. Hyperextend. GG
No one wins a knife fight!
You can't organize without awareness and you can't act without numbers. Educating is step one for social movements. Be angry, yes, but don't be angry at people still trying to educate people. Counterproductive doesn't begin to describe this.
They're actually very intelligent and know they can make any words mean whatever the fuck they want and no one can do a damn thing about it. Their perception of legitimacy is the only vulnerability they have.
I wish more people on here would recognize the opportunity we have with Talarico to disrupt the religious right with an empathetic leftist seminarian instead of reflexively doing the r/atheism thing of bashing all religious people and alienating our own electorate. Insanely bad politics from us.
Blexas 2028
Yeah but has he always been a huge writer
The caption does imply the women being shown are not considered attractive under "normal tastes" so I'm not really sure why the above is being down voted
I'm ideologically against IP laws to begin with and I don't really care about protecting corporation's anticompetitive practices.
But why
Who gives a fuck about that lmao
Did you watch the last video though
I mean there were still guns that didn't need to be reloaded if it bothered you that much
Well guns were practically unusable for half the classes so that was an immediate improvement in ME2
This is the funniest take to have right now
Being so obviously disruptive that no reasonable person would ever go to these lengths. A normal person, especially in SC, would at most go "eh, poor taste" and move on but no you're staking your whole fucking identity on this to prove a dem nominee is a homophobe for attacking a real life demon
How are you this stupid
The ad makes reference to him being "in the closet" but about his love for war. You're the one trying to say "oh this Democrat actually hates gay people because they used a double entendre in an ad about not getting Americans killed in wars"
What are you even doing, you dipshit white knight moron
This is actual CIA shit istg lmao
You know what throws races, being so sensitive about a joke that you label the dem nominee a homophobe before an election.
If you're not even from here and have no interest in helping, then seriously shut the fuck up
2) then shut the fuck up
Is this embracing bigotry or is it a fuckin double entendre you're way too sensitive about
1) are gay people actually being thrown under the bus here
2) do you live in South Carolina
Trolley problem: one mean implication in a political ad but a Democrat wins, or we elect a notorious closeted war hawk to drag us into more wars
I feel like I know which one I'm going to pick
Oh come on lmfao
Are we more invested in policing double entendres or winning elections against some of the most evil people alive
I'm not saying you're wrong but how about we pick our battles
I encourage you to look at pretty much any political poll of US adults so you can understand how fucking stupid the median voter is and you'll see why educators are so important to the movement.
I switched to cashless once covid hit and it's almost literally paying dividends now
This ad is directed at South Carolinian voters
Fwiw it's not hard to get someone to bend their arm if it's already fully extended like that and size doesn't play much of a role there. The rest of it is either implausible or ridiculous
It's generally not a very good move because it locks up one of the arms you could be defending with and at best only partially controls someone's movement. An experienced fighter will take advantage of an entire half of your body being unguarded.
One hand against their elbow, one hand on their wrist. Hyperextend. GG
No one wins a knife fight!
You can't organize without awareness and you can't act without numbers. Educating is step one for social movements. Be angry, yes, but don't be angry at people still trying to educate people. Counterproductive doesn't begin to describe this.
They're actually very intelligent and know they can make any words mean whatever the fuck they want and no one can do a damn thing about it. Their perception of legitimacy is the only vulnerability they have.
I wish more people on here would recognize the opportunity we have with Talarico to disrupt the religious right with an empathetic leftist seminarian instead of reflexively doing the r/atheism thing of bashing all religious people and alienating our own electorate. Insanely bad politics from us.
Blexas 2028
Yeah but has he always been a huge writer
The caption does imply the women being shown are not considered attractive under "normal tastes" so I'm not really sure why the above is being down voted
I'm ideologically against IP laws to begin with and I don't really care about protecting corporation's anticompetitive practices.
But why
Who gives a fuck about that lmao
Did you watch the last video though
I mean there were still guns that didn't need to be reloaded if it bothered you that much
Well guns were practically unusable for half the classes so that was an immediate improvement in ME2
This is the funniest take to have right now