170 pts ยท May 20, 2016
I browse frequently, upvote often, and post rarely. Here's a waffle. (#)
Chairs deserve loving homes too, man.
You're just determined to make yourself look foolish, aren't 'cha? You can't get more mainstream culture than Star Wars or Star Trek.
That's fucking cowardly.
Yep. Simply remaining silent is no longer sufficient. Fucking stupid rule that completely turns Miranda on its head.
Good, clean humor.
Part of why the protests under Martin Luther King were so remarkable.
I'd go with 1770 and the Boston Massacre.
Even though he should be placing his assets in a blind trust so he doesn't know if policies he advocates would benefit him.
If you mean the case from Florida that people love to cite saying Fox can lie, you're mistaken.
No she's not.
Because he's actually said before that he would be in favor of US intervention in Syria.
You should nest your comments if you're gonna rant :p
lawyers to do more pro bono work than towards allowing paralegals and the like to offer limited legal services.
issue in landlord/tenant law, and it's starting to receive more attention. So far, though, the movement seems to be towards encouraging >
pro bono hours. But yes, the American justice system is weighted against those that can't afford to pay for lawyers. It's been a major >
We have clinics that provide some of those services, usually staffed by law students on limited practice licenses or attorneys looking for >
Not sure why people are downvoting correct information. In the English system costs are paid by the loser. In America getting costs is rare.
Yeah. BBB accreditation really just means you paid them some sum of money for a window sticker.
asked my Professional Responsibility professor if I could do what I described, and she said that it's perfectly fine.
advice and tell them to seek the services of a licensed attorney if they want to do anything. Situation came up recently and I actually >
facts brought to me by a friend and tell him what my thoughts are on the situation. You just make it clear that you are not giving legal >
But you are allowed to give an opinion, so long as you're making clear that it's not a LEGAL opinion. For example, I can look at a set of >
really want to go forward with a claim that they should seek the help of a licensed attorney.
You can give your thoughts/advice, so long as you're making it clear that it's not LEGAL advice or opinion. And you recommend that if they >
honest reason is simply that lawyers don't want others playing on their turf.
The technical reason would be that paralegals aren't admitted to the bar and under the rules they can't be admitted to the bar. The more >
Force or fear has been an element for a long time. Unfortunately fear doesn't always fit into an extortion case. As I said, it's a grey area
"consent or death" the victim was presented with an actual choice and chose to consent. Terrible case.
Case was in 1988. And yes, at gunpoint is nonconsenting. But the court drew a distinction that because it wasn't a choice in the vein of >
Chairs deserve loving homes too, man.
You're just determined to make yourself look foolish, aren't 'cha? You can't get more mainstream culture than Star Wars or Star Trek.
That's fucking cowardly.
Yep. Simply remaining silent is no longer sufficient. Fucking stupid rule that completely turns Miranda on its head.
Good, clean humor.
Part of why the protests under Martin Luther King were so remarkable.
I'd go with 1770 and the Boston Massacre.
Even though he should be placing his assets in a blind trust so he doesn't know if policies he advocates would benefit him.
If you mean the case from Florida that people love to cite saying Fox can lie, you're mistaken.
No she's not.
Because he's actually said before that he would be in favor of US intervention in Syria.
You should nest your comments if you're gonna rant :p
lawyers to do more pro bono work than towards allowing paralegals and the like to offer limited legal services.
issue in landlord/tenant law, and it's starting to receive more attention. So far, though, the movement seems to be towards encouraging >
pro bono hours. But yes, the American justice system is weighted against those that can't afford to pay for lawyers. It's been a major >
We have clinics that provide some of those services, usually staffed by law students on limited practice licenses or attorneys looking for >
Not sure why people are downvoting correct information. In the English system costs are paid by the loser. In America getting costs is rare.
Yeah. BBB accreditation really just means you paid them some sum of money for a window sticker.
asked my Professional Responsibility professor if I could do what I described, and she said that it's perfectly fine.
advice and tell them to seek the services of a licensed attorney if they want to do anything. Situation came up recently and I actually >
facts brought to me by a friend and tell him what my thoughts are on the situation. You just make it clear that you are not giving legal >
But you are allowed to give an opinion, so long as you're making clear that it's not a LEGAL opinion. For example, I can look at a set of >
really want to go forward with a claim that they should seek the help of a licensed attorney.
You can give your thoughts/advice, so long as you're making it clear that it's not LEGAL advice or opinion. And you recommend that if they >
honest reason is simply that lawyers don't want others playing on their turf.
The technical reason would be that paralegals aren't admitted to the bar and under the rules they can't be admitted to the bar. The more >
Force or fear has been an element for a long time. Unfortunately fear doesn't always fit into an extortion case. As I said, it's a grey area
"consent or death" the victim was presented with an actual choice and chose to consent. Terrible case.
Case was in 1988. And yes, at gunpoint is nonconsenting. But the court drew a distinction that because it wasn't a choice in the vein of >