I mean...she's not wrong.

May 2, 2019 5:28 PM

DilligafDiva

Views

41996

Likes

1373

Dislikes

113

FP Edit: Familiar dick is reliable and sometimes necessary.
SEND. SEXY. BEARDS.

Who is she? I'm not familiar with her.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Eh. I still like Bernie, he’s consistent and I like his ideas.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Also if we can spend trillions to blow up a dude in a cave we can afford his policies.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Choking out a stranger during sex just feels "weird".

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

This guy gets it.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They're counting on the meme ballot to carry them home.

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

Have you seen that Biden memes? That's why Biden.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Trevor Noah seems to really hate Joe Biden for some reason

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Why is the mom from Good Times talking to us about penis?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah she is.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Biden is way to corporatist

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

The party that hates old white men is now putting an old white man as their front runner.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Almost like their entire existence is one big virtue signal or something.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Almost indeed.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe because the Democratic Party doesn't hate old white men, and it's just some strawman certain conservatives like to bring up?

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Does that dude give a good massage? I heard Biden gives a good massage...

7 years ago | Likes 102 Dislikes 9

if you can type here youre too old for his massage

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Identity politics is so toxic and illogical that the Dems pursue it at their own peril.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Notice how he's not saying better. Fresh as in new. Diverse as in, well not diverse opinions, rather ethnicity. As IF that makes them better

7 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 16

That's the point of the bit Trevor is basically saying in the end none of that truly matters people will choose who they feel is best

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Fascinating observation. "There are bodies with dark skin and/or vaginas, choose them"

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Different perspective when we're tired of the old one

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

He didn’t make any reference to diverse ethnicities.

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

That's implied when people just say "diverse" with no other qualifiers.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

This year we have candidates with diverse political opinions. I guess I’m in the minority to think of that first.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

That is a better use, yes, but the way that it's used, primarily by the left, is to say "non-white".

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

You gotta be willing to get that strange.

7 years ago | Likes 348 Dislikes 6

Bernie Sanders: Get that strange America!

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

Pass

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 9

He's out of your league anyways

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted May 2, 2019 10:42 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

ggggooooootttttt

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Being able to beat Trump is the only real qualification this time IMO. FWIW historically progressive D's never win, moderate D's often do.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Can't fucking wait to vote for another corporate-loving neoliberal because the Democrats won't but up someone that isn't center-right.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 10

Hahahahaha

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Can't wait to watch you vote for him. Go be socialist in Venezuela.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

"Diverse" is not the opposite of "white".

7 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 1

Maybe it's the opposite of "old, caucasian, heterosexual, christian male"?

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 16

Yeah, but that's not what the real definition is.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

This^

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

Not even opposite, just more options than just what SpaceballsTheComment said.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Office should be determined by individual merit and ideas, not on immutable, aesthetic characteristics.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Right, but the flaw is in when you only are taking people of merit from only one group. some people never even get a chance to prove 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

But that doesn't automatically disqualify him from leading as long as he is willing to listen to people who don't fit in those categories.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The democrats have a much better chance of winning by not nominating a “progressive” or socialist. A lot of people hate the far-left more.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

See 1st, no one running is a socialist. 2nd when polled on policies without right/left labels attached Americans lean moderately left.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

This is BS. The people who hate the far left won't be swayed by a centrist. The Dems need an exciting candidate to get people out to vote.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

This. Someone safe and center did not win in 2016. I think big elections will now be won by those who can get a lot of voters to the polls.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yup. Obama was a youngish black guy with relatively little experience. But he was smart, eloquent, and energetic and got people to show up.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

By the same token, Trump had literally no qualifications but got people riled up and he won the electoral vote. It's about energizing people

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Joe Biden voted for the war in Iraq he voted for NAFTA, permanent trade relations with China. He also supports the GOP supporting the coup

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In Venezuela. That’s a hard pass for me. I’ll vote for someone who isn’t corporatist and a warmonger.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When did diverse get it's definition changed to "not white"

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

That's not what is meant here. It means not another "Straight White 'Christian' Male" like Biden and most of the Republican candidates.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

when did Diversity's definition get changed to that?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

i would love to know what your definition is? cause "having more than one race sex religion present" seems to be the common understanding

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

yeah like I first asked, when did that become the definition of diversity. You can have a group of all white christian men in a room 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Identity politics are not your friend. For instance you don't know what diversity means because of it.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

while it still being diverse. Holy fuck you're a moron that you let them make you think that way.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

whatever, im still voting for bernie

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I really like bidens new slogan, "Biden: Gaurenteeing Another 4 Years of Trump"

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

"Except he can push the conservative agenda more effectively because he's more competent and less divisive than Trump"

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ehhhh iunno about that. Don't exactly enjoy watching children get groped by him

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think Trump is at best on even terms with Biden in terms of groping and sexual assault. And that's just based on what's on record.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No idea, both would need extensive research and investigating

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But only now that it's a (centrist) Democrat in question. Trump and Kavanaugh get carte blanche.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Nothing against Biden, I would absolutely vote him over Drumpf, but I’m feeling the Bern

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And yes I am on the younger side of the voting spectrum but this guy has the best intentions of anyone else out there

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am hopeful that I can live into my 80’s and that my kids and grandkids will not have inherited a world that can not sustain human life...

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I, unfortunately, think Biden is more of the same and right now that is not what we need. Shit has got to change

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And I cannot believe that I’m saying this, but I think our best bet is to go with the old white guy

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Joe “voted for the iraq war” Biden? Joe “voted for the patriot act” Biden? THAT Joe Biden? Yeah that’s a hard pass.

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 12

It's almost like he didn't want to be seen as the enemy of the country

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It’s almost like nobody makes good decisions all the time.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Maybe because Biden is a seasoned politician and statesman with the experience, know-how, and relationships to get shit done?

7 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 15

Just for the health of the nation, we need to stop electing 70 year olds.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Consider what shit he wants done though. Look at his voting record. It's not like he's going to innovate or uproot the corporate hold.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I think he would’ve won in 2016 in a landslide. In 2020, I’m not so sure

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

He doesn’t have a great track record on women’s and civil rights issues at the beginning of his career, that matters to me

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

By 'beginning' are we talking like 16ish yrs ago, before being picked for VP, or we talking like 45ish years ago when he was first elected?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The main thing that comes to mind is the Anita Hill hearings. He was the committee chair, that was early 90s

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, looking that up- that was some pretty shitty stuff. Thanks for the info.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He's a habitual liar that once plagiarized someone's entire fucking life. I will never understand why anyone liked him.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

A liar, an abuser of woman, an incompetent, a tool for the elites, a corrupter of the constitution, a supporter of Obamacare, a Democrat/

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

/but enough about Deficit Donnie. What about this Biden guy?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Not to mention he has the best chances of beating Trump, partly because he can get support from the white lower-middle class blue collars

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 9

Aka moderates. Most People aren’t as far left/right as the media would have you believe

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

He also has monetary ties to ISP fuckheads. Yay.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Statesman is a fascinating way to say career politician who is rooted in corruption.

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 8

He is rooted in corruption? First time I am hearing of it. You'd think it would be all over the place if it was true.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

did you not see who was at his fundraising dinner? all the good boys from Comcast, Verizon, PAC's....

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Sep 8, 2019 4:10 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

If it is common knowledge, yes. He is a presidential candidate. Your whole life gets investigated.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted May 14, 2019 5:15 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

The guy is filthy rich. Life long politicians don't become millionaires for public service.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I wanna like Biden but he is bought af

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

Dude they all are. Democrats can't run a straight presidental election. We learned that last year with Sanders.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Sep 8, 2019 4:09 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Good question. She's running as a Democrat and seems to be towing the party line lately, https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3609

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I like a lot of her principals. However, seeing her pull the white outfit stunt with the other rich hags in congress makes me question her.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sanders wasn't in it. Nor is he a Democrat.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

He ran democratic because there wasn’t any chance of him winning if he continued to run independent

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not going to vote for someone because they're a minority. Anyone who wants that is missing the point of politics.

7 years ago | Likes 290 Dislikes 26

Exactly

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Those people are going to be the death of the party. Won't vote for anyone whose not the right race, won't vote for anyone whose not 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

the right gender. Meanwhile the republicans have gotten so big tent they've elected an orange potato.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Who the fuck downvotes this

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

People who only read the first sentence and stopped.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Not that your vote counts anyway.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

True, but voting for someone because they're NOT a minority would be just as bad

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Right, and I'm totally NOT in that camp

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

but you'd vote for "familiar dick"?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Fuck yeah, an evil I know vs an unknown evil? That's what got us Trump

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Plus we've already checked that box as far as diversity goes.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

That argument is almost as strange as voting for someone because they're a minority..

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Seriously. It drove me nuts the last election cycle people saying they were voting for Hilary because "it's time for a woman president"

7 years ago | Likes 101 Dislikes 8

I think most people were for Hillary because she was infinitely more qualified than Trump.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

That type of person is the only thing that scares me more than Trump supporters

7 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 7

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Trump is our first orange president. Look at how that diversity turned out?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Research the Obama campaign did in the ‘08 primary was telling. “I want a woman to be President, but not this woman.” Should’ve remembered.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

While it IS time.. it should be a good one, not whatever's lying around.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was wondering if it would even be a big step for women if the first woman president was the wife of a former president.

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Imagine if someone was the first female CEO of some big company, and she was the wife of a former CEO, no one would take that seriously.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

They took Obama seriously, despite being half white and raised exclusively by his white family.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I mean, he was still black, and the first black president. Strictly speaking, upbringing didn’t matter for that

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well almost any female candidate is going to have a primarily male father.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

People need to understand that it's not about 'turns' it's about winning the fight

7 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 8

It's not a fight

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought it was about electing someone who will improve and protect the country and it's values, not beating the other guy.

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It should be, but America's current political system is a big tug-of-war between two parties with often opposing ideas on what that means.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The two parties both play important roles. The problem is that the public has forgotten what those roles are and too many people vote as 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

though one party is wholly right or one is wholly wrong, and voters just choose a side rather than consider candidates from both sides. 2/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A centrist that appeals to most people over someone farther in the political spectrum

7 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 6

People should pick policies they like, not b/c the labels attached to them. Lots of “left” policies are popular w/ 75%+ of the population.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

This is bullshit. Republicans have pushed the narrative that we all have to move to the center while they move further right.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

And if an extremely 'left' candidate was winning elections, it would make less sense to recommend a centrist. But since the democrats 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

2/2 lost the presidency, a centrist stands a better chance of winning undecided voters.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

A centrist dem lost the last election to a far right nut. It's not about the undecided voters, it's about getting people excited to vote.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you look at the midterms, several far left candidates either won or outperformed. I think that's a sign of shifting times.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's what Clinton was, but conservatives don't cross to moderates, as Trump has proven

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 12

Clinton was right-wing.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

She was pro life, anti- regulation, anti- environmentalism, pro- tax cuts for the wealthy?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Which Clinton?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Clinton was centrist by today’s standards. That’s because liberal standards have been moving very quickly the past 20 or so years

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted May 14, 2019 5:16 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I’m not even sure what you’re referring to. Are you calling Clinton right??

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which Clinton?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Both? Either? My point remains

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

No, it doesn't. I doubt they have identical politics.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean, shouldn’t we be looking for “most qualified” instead of “fresh and diverse”? No offense toward any qualified candidate.

7 years ago | Likes 501 Dislikes 22

Hillary was First Lady, US Senator, and Secretary of State. But apparently she was boring and corrupt. I don't know what to think anymore.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

We should be going with "Whoever is most likely to win". We can worry about qualified when the country is no longer burning.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

“Burning”

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Both metaphorically, and often literally. Most of those California wildfires are on mismanaged federal land.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Literally in Cali, sad but true. Mother Natures no joke. Metaphorically, meh. Figuratively, neh.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You seen what the otherside has been rollin' with? "Qualified" sure as fuck aint gonna cut it these days.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The fact that the "no offense" qualifier even needed to be added to that somewhat epitomizes the issues many take with some candidates.

7 years ago | Likes 159 Dislikes 16

No offense wasn't actually needed though

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Exactly my point

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I've seen enough Biden memes to know he is more than qualified

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's unamerican. You pick the person you think is coolest.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Agreed, "fresh and diverse" is (sorta) how we got Drumpf...

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

In politics? Haha... Just take a look at who is in the white house right now.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Did you see who got elected last time?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

get outta here with your sound logic

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, given that the party core has been taken over by hardcore racists and sexists - no. Racial hierarchy matters the most for them.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Andrew Yangs audiobook sold me on him, then I looked at his planed policy's. Everyone else just has poorly detailed platitudes.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'll ask you this because I've asked a few Yang supporters on Facebook and haven't gotten an answer: Yang's talked about Alaska having a

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

form of Universal Basic Income in the form of the PFD. However, Alaska is currently in a budget crisis because it's been running a deficit

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

for years and the newly-elected governor ran on a balanced budget platform without reducing PFDs. Gov. decided to do this by making

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

absolutely MASSIVE cuts to basic services like education, healthcare, etc. However, he could have potentially paid for all these services

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Anyone in a position to run for President or whatever is going on right now is already the least qualified individual.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm sure whoever is truly most qualified to be the President is someone we have never and will never hear of with the system we have.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

no, you always go with the guy with the best hair, like ceo's

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Joe Biden is crap. No more center-right corporate dems. If I wanted a republican I would vote for one.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

People call for the "most qualified" out of one side of there face then lambast them as "establishment" out of the other.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Agreed, but I still don't like Biden as the candidate. He's way too corporate and I don't think he'll be aggressive enough w the Repubs

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hey now, Fresh and Diverse got us Trump.

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 7

A rich old white guy is fresh and diverse? I know what you meant but thought that was funny.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

He was new to Washington and has different opinions. Diverse doesn't have to mean demographic

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

And I quote "I KNOW WHAT YOU MEANT BUT THOUGHT THAT WAS FUNNY". Getting tired of people not reading what I say.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We tried, but everyone said Hillary was boring

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 33

She had great creds.

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 17

I didn’t agree with or trust her but I could say that about most politicians

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Hillary had so much shit thrown at her the last 30 years theres no way to get smell off - Lewis Black

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Hillary is a slimeball. She's not qualified at all.

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

Based on what? She's been a senator, secretary of state. How are those not credentials?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Because "corporate shill" supersedes them.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I'm pretty sure Trump is walking proof that's not true

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Since the 1880s there have been 2 presidents that didnt have job of Senator, VP or governor. Eisenhower and Herbert Hoover.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

We need a second Eisenhower, I vote we nominate Mattis

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And Trump.

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Hes president? Fuuuuck.

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Ya, he's stayed pretty under the radar though so I'm not surprised you hadn't heard yet.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Under appreciated comment of the day here...

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

TBF Eisnehower was Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces in WW2 so I'd say his resume was slightly more impressive than rando senator guy

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And Army Chief of Staff. And Hoover was the secretary of commerce (and under secretary of all other departments). My point was simply that

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The president should be kind of an elder statesman not something you do early in your life.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

that's one of the biggest problems with the political left right now: elect based on skin colour & gender, rather than skill & qualification

7 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 19

A different perspective is a qualification though. You think Republicans voted for Trump based on his experience?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Its just a loud few.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

it is, but unfortunately too many people are paying attention to the loud few. even Obama said they need to chill

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

he said they're in a circular firing quad over the virtue signalling they're doing, shooting eachother over transgressions against diversity

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Yes. I wouldnt worry about them though, it became pretty obvious how powerless they are when the Virginia Governor stuff happend.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the far left are basically running the mirror of neo nazi ideology. instead of white men only, it's non-white non-male only

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 20

Nonsense. You're an idiot, bro

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Right. That's why the left loves Bernie Sanders.

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

there's a difference between the left and the far left. same as how there's a difference between the right and the far right

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

and the far left are not a fan of bernie, cause he's an old white man. the far left are the nutcases of the left

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

I mean... You say that... On a post talking about a 76 year old straight white man leading polls for the left...

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

And the Left are upset that their base isn't inclusive and progressive enough, which is just going to lead them to further alienating 1/?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

their base. 2/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Is it really now? Because it seemed to get more people out to vote than ever before. People are tired of corrupt politicians.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What if the fresh and diverse one IS the most qualified? Would you recognize that or dismiss it as a "quota hire"?

7 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 10

Remember Obama?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Biden was Vice President. Not sure what makes someone more qualified.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

I'd argue being a governor is a better qualification, especially one of a larger state: actual decision making experience on a similar, 1/

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

if smaller scale, as opposed to a mostly observatory role. Most of the VP's actual duties involve the senate and not the presidency 2/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So...Cheney should have been president? He was already president in everything but name

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Whether or not he should be elected is up to each person. He was definitely qualified though.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

As VP Biden was a good foil for a competent but boring president. He seems too scandal and national embarrassment prone to be president.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

I would have agreed with you before Trump was elected.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I refuse to lower the bar on what I expect from the president because of a con man. "At least he's not Trump" is not good enough.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Except most qualified probably means someone in the establishment already. Most of them are shills for their corporate donors.

7 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 14

Well then they aren't most qualified. It means your method of qualificaion is lacking.

7 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

This is a much better way of saying what I was trying to say.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Unless we look at experience as any role as a good public leader, not limited to government. Adding "good" disqualifies the shills

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

People have been philosophizing on what it is to be "good" for millenia. That's not exactly a concrete standard.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But we should separate capability (in governance and as a politician) from trustworthiness, among many relevant traits.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'd argue somebody that isn't trustworthy isn't capable of (good) governance, for my two cents.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I agree trustworthiness is essential and even overriding, but experience will still be chalked up to capability. So it helps to see trust as

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0