Unnecessary Information to Read While You Poop

Mar 1, 2016 6:41 AM

Views

182545

Likes

8401

Dislikes

257

If you made it this far, congratulations. You wasted about 4 minutes. I wasted 5 making this post. Leave me alone.

#13 "Right back in"

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I'm going to go poop so I can read these, one sec....

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ok, now where was I.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

brilliant quote on how "consensus" actually works in science.

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Consensus is the exact polar opposite of science. Repeatable, documented, proof. 1500 years ago the consensus was that the earth was flat.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

As usual: don't check 'em, just enjoy the bullshit

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The Einstein one is incorrect. A committee of one hundred against is theory was created, he replied I don't know why they need a committee,1

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

*Need for citation intensifies*

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Agreed

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#23 will likely always hold the record for most enemies shot down by an airplane pilot. Just don't have air warfare like that anymore.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

#28 Oh, well, okay then. We'll just take the blood back and call it even, yeah?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

The point of this one is that there is a legal document stating their wishes. What he did goes against that. As an EMT if a patient 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

has a written DNR, must be present at the scene at least in PA, and we perform CPR and save them we can be sued and will lose. It isn't 2/?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Apr 18, 2016 10:06 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

about whether our actions were the right thing to do or not, but the desired wishes and legal wishes of the patient. 3/3

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I poop longer than this though....Nevertheless, here's your Green Arrow.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Hartmann was forced to crash-land his damaged fighter 14 times due to damage received from parts of enemy aircraft he had just shot down"

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Still never shot down. Just collateral damage. ^_^ (Assuming that was your point.)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#10 This is half true. The Vietnamese did not fear the Ace of Spades. American soldiers thought they did because soldiers are superstitous.

10 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 2

They knew they're going to lose. 'Cause gambling's for fools. But that's the way they liked it baby, they don't wanna live forever

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Outstanding.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yo. Is #6 actually true?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Making it as safe as a 1987 Fiat X1/9

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's pretty damn awesome. Thank you for the link also!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

First post I open right as I sit down to poo. +1

10 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 2

Same

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

1st time I read "while poo" while not actually pooing. Felt weird. Favorited it so I can read it later while I actually poo.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's a fact that information becomes 90% more true if you overlay it on top of a slightly relevant picture

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

What was the slogan they arm wrestled for?

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The important question is who won?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

WHO'S NEXT? YOU DECIDE.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To the list of Tech 'presents' the UK gave to the US can be added penicillin. You wonder why our economic status declined? Now you know.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I think bigger factors were the near complete loss of overseas territories, vast war debts and decline in the importance of naval supremecy.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also, you gave them all your gold reserves.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

There was also a 'firesale' of all our American (continental North and South) business assets. And we finished repaying the war debt in 2005

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

and we gave them several of our island bases, and allowed the dollar to dominant the market. But if anyone asks, they saved us.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It was either going to be the dollar or the mark.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

tell that to the Russians.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Us bitter? No.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

@OP 's mother is charged double at the Panama Canal.

10 years ago | Likes 429 Dislikes 6

@OP's mother left that baby in the dumpster in Alberta.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

At least OP got to meet his dada

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

You can't cross if you displace all the water, dude...

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

OP's mom charges double for her canal.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

She would be, if her ass could actually fit in it

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Whoever lands on @OP's mom and doesn't want her, can sell her to the highest bidder.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*ahem*. Sources?

10 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 11

The one about the dalai lama tho?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except they're probably only accounting for commercial sites, not all of the spam/garbage/traps promising port but delivering viruses.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's an excellent point. Probably not a lot of folks out there building fake church sites and luring people in with fake download buttons.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just going to the source at Kickassfacts.com and giving the sources they gave.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Taylor swift can rake my praying mantis pod any day

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

I'll let her know you said so.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

So how was Taylor at her job? Was she.... swift?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

BOOO! XD

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

go away

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*leaves the room*

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah but that's a bullshit monopoly rule. Just like if you don't ask for the property you don't get it. I hate my sister basically.

10 years ago | Likes 118 Dislikes 6

It's a rule that makes the game not drag on.

10 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 1

ProTip: Never buy Hotels. There are a set amount of houses and if you own them all nobody else can.

10 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 1

Yea but you can't put more than 4 houses per lot. At least you can't in the app

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is true but theres like 32 houses all you need is 8 lots and you're in complete control.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Been using that strategy for ages. My kids picked up on it after a while and now we have some seriously cutthroat Monopoly games.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

So......then you'd have a monopoly on hotels?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

On houses.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

How is it Bullshit? Sometimes I'll intentionally not buy a property, just to try and get it cheaper at auction. Sometimes it even works.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Works a lot.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

except the rules state you can't bid on properties you land on...

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That last one is patently false. --law guy

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

But muh dog seent it!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But do you have a degree in bird law?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No :(

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But is it false because other animals can also testify or bc no animals can? They def cant swear/affirm but I've heard of dogs testifying b4

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Well, because I'm a pedantic twat, they are animals so it's physically impossible for them to "testify". But to your actual question, it (1)

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

is false because evidence gleaned from *any* animal can be admitted so long as the evidence meets certain arcane criteria. (2/end)

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Ha yeah, I get what you're saying, but I mean nothing a dog utters on the stand would be admissible because it cannot swear/affirm, right?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

That's one of the arcan(in)e criteria for admissibility of evidence in every jurisdiction - so that should bar(k) the evidence right there

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Sort of but not really. Swearing is only a requirement for evidence in the form of testimony. Dog evidence would be in a different form.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The witness who explains the dog evidence would certainly have to swear (think police handler and drug dog)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#4 holy shit, woodhouse

10 years ago | Likes 605 Dislikes 2

Too bad he is missing

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

he's like you the player in an average COD single player game

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

He was not the only one Alvin York was much the same but captured many more.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck yeah Australia!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sounds like captain America the first avenger

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

REGGIEEEEEEEEE

10 years ago | Likes 119 Dislikes 0

Don't forget about the scalps!

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

that's a lot of scalps

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

IKR

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's a lot of scalps!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Woodhouse is a beast!

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

*was

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

R.I.P. George Coe, a very funny man.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sorta yeah

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Roadhouse

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Hey, nice job, thanks for not just killing all of us."

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Seeing how in the first year of that war, a Christmas armistice was called with soldiers playing soccer against the other side...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

(2) I just feel like it was more of a 'Yes, you're the enemy, but damn. That was impressive!'

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

True; really depends on what point in the war that was I guess. I think a lot of that goodwill evaporated after they gassed each other.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

LLLLLLEEEEEROOOOYYYYY HMMNMNHHH JENKIIIINS

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

+1 for the hmmmnnnhh

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And this is why I tend to roll my eyes at those "I'll take things that never happened for 500" comments.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

You should try not being so cynical: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominic_McCarthy#Victoria_Cross_action

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Those stories are all insane.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Check up the CMoH stories too. They're about as insane.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fish.. **** in it.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Me in verdun

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just wait until you hear about Alvin York...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Fag?

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

Have you got one? Dying for a smoke

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

For the downvoters, it's a reference to the fucking show

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

He's asking for a cigarette

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

When you have to carry your entire team to victory #JustGamerThings

10 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 1

when u carry them hard and u still lose

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Sounds like #23

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#5 - "partially requiring an intense rescue operation". "Do we need to rescue them?" "Yeah but just the tip of the pod".

10 years ago | Likes 196 Dislikes 0

But why is this a big deal? The Pod was supposed to withstand the cold and vacuum of space. That water would have been nothing for it.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It turns out they actually just waited for better conditions because the cosmonauts were fine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz_23

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually, spacecraft can be surprisingly fragile. Remember space is empty. Specifically, no air pressing down on the sides of the module.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Hell, the Lunar lander on the apollo missions had some walls that were about as thick as a sheet or two of tin foil.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Lunar Lander vs thing designed to enter Earth's Atmosphere and specifically deal with pressure changes though.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Again, the space ship is designed to deal with 0 to 1 atmospheres of pressure. Water is HEAVY. At ten meters deep, you're looking at 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I guess since it had impacted on the ice, potential fractures in the pod perhaps?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They where not worried. The capsule had enough oxygen and obviously it's waterproof.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's built to withstand 0 to 1 atm of pressure. On the bottom of a lake you can have a few more than that.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You saw that too. I couldn't fit the life of me figure out what they meant by "partially"

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 2

They meant the lake partially refroze, comma placement is important!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought it was a poorly structured attempt to convey that the ice was partially frozen.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

*for

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I believe there were other factors that caused the rescue to be required besides the factors listed.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

partially frozen over

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Not the way it's written. The coma before 'partially' means it has nothing to do with the qualification of the previous clause.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

it is written incorrectly :O

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Wiki says it was 2/3 underwater, which is actually partially.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If it's legal to put "Do not resuscitate" on a medical file, it should also be legal to take your own life.

10 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 1

To be fair, you cant really be charged for a successful suicide.

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

In one nation in the 70's, suicide was illegal and if you got caught you got hanged... Because logic.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure it's "illegal" so that people are legally allowed to attempt to stop a suicidal person

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"You stand accused of suicide, how do you plead?" ".............................."

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

But that would be stepping on religion (that doesn't control anything, so sir-ee, separation of church and state is totally a thing).

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

What the hell does being allowed to take your own life, have to do with religion?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

In the cases of medically assisted suicide, religions associates are the highest opposition. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Bevause it's "against gods plan" and "you'd be playing god". Plus they believe you'll go straight to hell.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And? Making something legal, that some religions want illegal, isn't a violation of church and state. How did you make that connection?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It would be a violation of the separation of the church and state if they DID keep it illegal for the reasons you listed.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I think snipers account for the curvature of the earth when they shoot.

10 years ago | Likes 111 Dislikes 7

Also the spin of the bullet causes it to drift. That's why modern tanks are smoothbore, who needs spin when you have fin?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Actually, that's at best a secondary benefit. The primary benefits are that HEAT rounds don't work right in rifled barrels, and that... 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2/2 ...Kinetic rounds can reach MUCH higher velocities in the same barrel length, vastly improving anti-armor performance of both rounds.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They also last longer. Why do HEAT rounds work better in a smoothbore? WWII is my forte when it comes to tanks so I'm not sure.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The spin imparted by rifling makes the jet of molten metal less focused, meaning it doesn't burn through as much armor as it could.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Interesting, I never would have thought the spin would have much of an effect considering the speed of the jet.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What is this curvature you guys keep talking about?

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

it's what your mum has waaay too much of.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We all know that the earth is flat. They're not fooling us.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

No. They account for Coriolis apparent force, due to earth rotation.

10 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 8

So they count for a spherical spinney thing. Same difference

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 3

Why that's most retarded! You know gravity and wind are caused by the same spherical spinny thing too?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Almost got annoyed at the troll, then read username

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Sniper terminology, got it

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Exactly. As a sniper for seal team six with over 800 confirmed kills, I had no idea what they meant until I heard spherical spinny thing.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The atmosphere rotates with the earth

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This is a ballistic effect, not a fluid-dynamic effect. Although a similar effects acting on the atmosphere are well known.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And it rotates faster at the equator and slower at the poles. That's why it matters.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't think snipers can shoot THAT far.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just using it to illustrate the point.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

also wtf is a sniper bullet, anything is a sniper bullet if you use it to snipe

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Anything is a sniper bullet if you're brave enough!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You don't know about sniper bullets? HAHA!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Clearly, it's colloquial shorthand for "bullet intended for use in a high-power and long range rifle".

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

Coriolis effect acts on all bullets no matter the speed or distance

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Sure, but most bullets don't travel far enough for it to be noticeable.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Depends on your expectations.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The statement is about target moving because of earth's rotation. That is completely false, as the bullet and target have the same momentum

10 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 9

But the atmosphere moves with the earth

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Not at the same speed at all points.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No they don't. A target at the north pole would have much less spin momentum than a bullet fired from the equator. It is simple stuff.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why don't you do a little research before spouting shit? The coriolis effect comes from the rotation.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

It has more to do with centripetal force that the target actually moving.

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

The bullet retains the spin momentum from the earth spinning. That's all there is to it.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The coriolis force probably would cause more problems here dependent onhow long the bullet is in the air.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

So if your shooting north and south, you wont have any correction, unlike how some people think it works.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Actually you would still need to correct for the coriolis force if your target is far away.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

No, shooting along the equator is the only way to get around it.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Shooting from north to south would have the most effect actually.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Jehovah's witnesses are some of the most intense people when it comes to scripture, doctors should respect that shit, even if it's crazy.

10 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 34

Doctors should respect life and limb not religious bs

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

If adults want to die, fine. But no way should a child die due to spiritual beliefs of the parents.

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

If I had the chance to save the life, I wouldn't give a shit about their beliefs.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Most doctor's don't even use blood anymore its and out dated treat sent for loss of blood. Classic case of being ahead of your time .....

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

As a doctor, this is bollocks. We use blood plenty. Fluid resuscitation has its limits.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

My JW aunt once refused to sign a document giving doctors to save her FIVE YEAR OLD’s life in case of accident during a school trip. (…)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

(…) That’s the same woman who once took back a wristwatch she’d just given me (age 15), just because she realized it was my birthday.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's bizarre, are they anti-birthday as well?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

She was certainly enti-everything that could be perceived as celebrating anything else than God.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

She must have so many friends.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As an exjw it's a twisted unscriptural belief. It's meant to create martyrs. Early on Jws didn't allow organ transplants either.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

They were also anti vaxers from the start, a belief they also reversed later. Again tho ppl were harmed due to following the watchtower

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

They later reversed that belief on organ transplants but ppl died because of the unneeded doctrine.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

As an ex JW, There are lots of non blood expanders with less risk, and more hospitals offer bloodless surgeries including open heart.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Can't you donate your own blood to be used if you need a surgery? (assuming you're strong enough)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, because of the command in the old testament that any blood should not be eaten and blood should be poured on the ground.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

JW tried to hook one of my co-workers grandma. She said: "I can't eat blood sausage no more?! Get the fuck out! D:<"

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Never met a Jehovah's witness who respected that God wants us to help ourselves, call a doctor rather than expecting God to fix everything.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Reminds me of the joke about the priest who goes out on a boat and gets into difficulties. Three other boats pass by and offer to rescue him

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

But he turns them away insisting that God will save him. His boat eventually sinks and he drowns. Up in heaven, he asks God why He didn't

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

save him. God replies "I sent you three boats, what more do you want?"

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

That is horribly incorrect. They openly welcome treatment. They simply abstain from blood transfusions, and helped Pioneer bloodless surgery

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Why do they abstain from blood transfusions? God gave us the intellect to heal ourselves but man wrote the Bible.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because the bible commands to refrain from blood in any way because it's sacred. It's the biggest reason bloodless surgery is growing

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Many hospitals have bloodless surgery centers because of it. Much less risk than using blood that could be contaminated less side effect s

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and when you're in the doctors shoes, as a person dedicated to saving lives, to be forced to assist in the suicide of a healthy person?

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 12

It's not the same as suicide, as you're allowing the person to die, not killing them.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Strawman! Get your strawman right here! Only 6 left, act now!

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 8

how is this strawman? i am not exaggerating nor am i distorting his/her argument. This is these are the consequences..

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

...or a troll...

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I think I'll screencap this thread as an example of cognitive dissonance. Unless you are just intellectually dishonest...?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

cognitive dissonance for sure. no idea how it's intellectual dishonesty.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

please explain your point of view better, how is it a strawman argument?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

#26; as a current Wal-Mart Employee, I'm not surprised in the fucking least.

10 years ago | Likes 538 Dislikes 2

I am. Most businesses have insurance for when things happen that cause them to not be able to operate covers what money they would have 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Made. Police investigation/ murder are both great reasons for that. They could have closed and recouped all their losses and then some

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

With the customers I've met over the years, fairly certain they would have caused more uproar by closing the entire store

10 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 0

Was also my response. I'd be shocked if the customers actually stayed outside the tape, to be honest

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Fact: The Wal-Mart employee handbook states that if you witness someone die, you can take the rest of the day off.

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

Subtext: Encourage annoying co-workers to partake in unsafe workplace activities

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Nah Jerry, you're fine, I'm holding the ladder. Keep reaching. Just a liiiitle farther aaaand HALF DAY! Sorry Jer.

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Lady was killed in the parking lot of the one I used to work at, they just roped off the section of the lane she was shot in.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

My Wal-Mart had the fire alarm go off but as not as a drill. One lady refuse to leave said she needed to shop. A fireman had to drag her out

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm surprised that anyone finds this surprising! Has there consistent fuckery of social issues/norms not blatant evidence totheirpsychopathy

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

fellow associate here, doesn't shock me at all either. Gotta make dat money! -.-

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I read about a girl who wanted to see how long she could live in a Wal-Mart, she stayed, and slept in a 24 hr one for over a week. She 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 left because she got bored and wanted to go home. not because anyone asked any questions.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You've probably seen some shit

10 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 0

Honestly mostly piss, angry people, stupid people, deaths and a threat at knifepoint.

10 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

On my first day at Walmart a guy died in our canned goods aisle. Not much was done.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

We've had a guy have a heart attack in the parking lot after refusing our attempts to help, and a suicide in the 'lot.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Literally

10 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 0

#YouHaveNOIDEA

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's a different store I work at, but I cleaned up shit just two days ago.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was at Wal-Mart the other day and they lost power, the promptly kicked everyone out of the store

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

If someone tripped in the dark they'd get sued.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

At Costco we have power generators that last as while so people can continue shopping comfortably while we panic

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Generator probably failed. We have one, still had to close the store though because it wouldn't work when we lost power.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ours has a generator for things like refrigeration, but the registers shut down after like 30 min.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Same at my store. We don't kick people out, though. We just assume power will come back shortly and go from there.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(FL stores tend to lose power a lot)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0