Good news everyone...

May 29, 2015 10:46 AM

TedBuckley

Views

569769

Likes

15970

Dislikes

143

Back in 2013 a 19-year-old developed a plan to clean up the world’s oceans in just 5 years, removing 7,250,000 tons of plastic. Last week, Boyan Slat (now 21), founder and CEO of The Ocean Cleanup, announced that this awesome project will be deployed in 2016.

Slat’s invention consists of an anchored network of floating booms and processing platforms that could be dispatched to garbage patches around the world. Working with the flow of nature, his solution to the problematic shifting of trash is to have the array span the radius of a garbage patch, acting as a giant funnel as the ocean moves through it. The angle of the booms would force plastic in the direction of the platforms, where it would be separated from smaller forms, such as plankton, and be filtered and stored for recycling. The issue of by-catches, killing life forms in the procedure of cleaning trash, can be virtually eliminated by using booms instead of nets and it will result in a larger areas covered. Because of trash’s density compared to larger sea animals, the use of booms will allow creatures to swim under the booms unaffected, reducing wildlife death substantially.

The array is projected to be deployed in Q2 2016. The feasibility of deployment, off the coast of Tsushima, an island located in the waters between Japan and South-Korea is currently being researched. The system will span 2000 meters, thereby becoming the longest floating structure ever deployed in the ocean (beating the current record of 1000 m held by the Tokyo Mega-Float). It will be operational for at least two years, catching plastic pollution before it reaches the shores of the proposed deployment location of Tsushima island. Tsushima island is evaluating whether the plastic can be used as an alternative energy source.

Tl;Dr: Just read it.

http://www.trueactivist.com/longest-floating-structure-in-history-sets-out-to-clean-the-ocean-in-2016/

But what about micro plastics? They can be as small as bacteria....

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Someone will fuck this up for money...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

odd neither a mention of cost or who pays

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I have had many sleepless nights over this issue. I am unbelievably happy & hopeful humans can solve the problems we've created. Impressive.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Color me stupid but won't that suck up fish also?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's more like a sweeping brush, if that helps

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Best news I've heared all day. Even proud to be Dutch.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Curse our 20th century garbage making skills! And God Bless that kid who can clean up after it. Really impressive stuff! Future = Bright

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And we could have had a world of garbage if it weren't for that meddling kid!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a marine biologist, I'm glad they have taken even the tiniest organisms into account when considering bycatch

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Gyre's. The Great Pacific Garbage patch is largely formed because of them (well, and Humans). Knowledge! :D & a cool site- www.5gyres.org/

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Wait, they have seen The Simpsons episode where Mr Burns does this, right? That didn't turn out very well.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a grandma I have spent mych time raising children to grow into adults like this. I hope and pray an age of enlightenment is coming.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Jeez I sound like my Ingress game :S

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's noble. I like it.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Read the title in the Professors voice

10 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 1

I did, too.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Always go full Farnsworth for this stuff.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

G,N, E!

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Tsushima Island = Tsu Island Island. #justwordthings

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

i wonder if bear bear bear lives there

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

sick reference game

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a sailor...argh.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

skiddle-dee-dee, skiddle-dee-doo agagagagagagagaga

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why? They'll obviously have de-markation, will be on GPS and radar, and will likely have an escort.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It looks like it'd have to be treated the same way as annoying mile-long fishing nets...which means sailing around it.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

CLEAN UP CLEAN UP EVERYONE LETS CLEAN UP

10 years ago | Likes 132 Dislikes 6

KEEP IT CLEAN

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

All parents know this song haha

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Is it made of plastic? It looks like it was made of plastic.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

teh irony

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

poetic justice

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Too lazy to read.. What is a boom?

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

in this context, they're long floating things that capture stuff floating on the surface of the water

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A containment unit used mostly for oil spills. : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boom_(containment)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A boom is a long ass stick of some kind. The guy you see on movie sets with the mic on the end of a 6-8" pole is the boom mic operator.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Interesting idea, but some of the trash is not on the surface, but a few inches underneath. Waves make it even worse

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

and most of it is in the form of small particles, which this will miss entirely

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This should be able to pick up anything down to the size of a finger nail, making it work for the food sizes that kill birds.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I saw a ted talk on this, booms will go down several meters and the sea life will have to dive under those.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The bigger pieces are a bigger threat to wildlife I believe.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The large particles (bottles, etc) aren't the real problem. The small and micro particles are the real problem. Smaller = worse. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That said, this would help so much. I really hope it gets deployed on schedule & works as projected. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I agree, but they stem from the big stuff this is tackling.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They partly come from degradation from the larger particles, but much of the really small stuff comes from waste runoff 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

e.g. water from washing machines (micro particles from clothing, etc) & processing plants are a problem. Gets eaten & goes up foodchain 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But this could help w/ the degradation of existing objects and clean down to a certain size - which would be AMAZING.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I agree

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Are u a Necromancer?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Who's funding it? I doubt any government anywhere gives half a fuck, and running constant funcraising for donations would be exhausting.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Add a penny to the cost of every ounce of plastic, plus every finished object... not sure

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Are you serious? Governments and corporations will be eager to fund this. Just search for 'green government funding'

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Holy fuck. YESSS. Please let this work.

10 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 3

It sounds like a great idea for cleaning up surface trash, but the real problem is submerged pieces and small plastic particles

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't let "it's not perfect" prevent you from getting started with the easier stuff. There's gunk under the fridge, but you still tidy up.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(2/2) going to spend the time on the little stuff if there's so much big stuff.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, it's kinda like when you're walking down the street and it's not bottles or bags. It's gum packets and cigarette butts. No one is(1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've got a friend who works at a startup that converts any plastic back to oil. This would be perfect for them.

10 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 2

Plastic back to oil back to an oil spill in the ocean. Brilliant!

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 11

you must be fun at parties

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

joke /jōk/ -noun- a thing that someone says to cause amusement or laughter, especially a story with a funny punchline.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Fair enough; I didn't downvote you; just commented

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

TDP?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What's the startup?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

2 It's an energy intensive process, but the reclaimed oil has more energy than required to process it. The biggest problem they have is

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't recall the name, it's Portland based. The gist I got from him is that recycling is preferred, but not all plastics can be recycled.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 getting a steady supply of enough waste plastics.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your or your friend should do a post about that! It'd be great to see more science on Imgur, and I love environmental science.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

He's not an imgurian, but I'll talk to him see if I can get him to post some stuff.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Now watch as various politicians stand up and wave their dicks around to fuck it all up for reasons. $$$ reasons.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

You know it!!!!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How can corporations profit off that? its literally just cleaning the ocean.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Are we being paid stupid-high amounts of money to do this? No? Time to fuck it up!"-Politics 101

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I guess, i would like to think people are not this bad but they probably are.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Its like a cruel, heartless Murphy's Law. "If something could potentially improve life for all people, someone will try to fuck it up."

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Rip messages in bottles

10 years ago | Likes 235 Dislikes 5

Sending out an SOS

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Boy, that'd make a good ad. Guy marooned on desert island sends one, gets filtered, bottle recycled. Flash back to guy starting fire w/stick

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

"Sorry, Dave."

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

*The Police song playing in my head*

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Maybe we should quit that. I mean it's cute.. but imagine how much garbage it is if one in even 50 people would do it. Also who'd read them?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sting will never be found :(

10 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 0

Dude, a HUNDRED MILLION BOTTLES washed up on that shore. This is a problem that needs to be FIXED.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Maybe it's not Sting sending out the SOS...it's the Earth

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Whoa.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

AMAZING COMMENT

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

+3

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

When I try to do my part!

10 years ago | Likes 595 Dislikes 1

So it's a large machine that when you recycle bottles, you get kitties?! Looks like this guy got a two for-one-deal too.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Instructions unclear, kitten ran off with penis.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

What's the matter baby? Cat got your penis? ;) (At first that auto corrected to pianos, I almost left it lol)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is why I have trust issues with women dressed like Catwoman. But hey it's Catwoman, in the end you can't resist.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

SURPRISE MOTHERFUCKER

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Wait, they have invented how to make kittens out of plastic bottles? How are these not everywhere yet???

10 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 0

At first, I honestly thought they were monkeys. Had to look at it again after your comment.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

i want one of these machines for my home

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

You can make one yourself: just put 2 cats in a box - 1 female and 1 male, and in a few months you'll have kittens!

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

or 2 dead cats

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm pretty sure this will get you maggots...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

oh my god, do the scientists know about this?!?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

IDK but I want one that makes kittens out of bottles, not adult cats!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm skeptical that it will work, but really hope it does...

10 years ago | Likes 527 Dislikes 6

Even if it's only like 10% effective, that's still much better than not getting any of the trash out at all.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I watched the pitch accompanying the article, the trials he did appear to work, on a small scale. Here's to change, chipbchipcheerio

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There's math on both sides of this for the feasibility of it working. It's hard to say

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I imagine this being rammed by the first captain that does not give a floating fuck, but we can always hope.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Floating fuck, surprised I've not heard that one before.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Would be more trouble than its worth getting it out of his props.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That would be sweet justice. Ram the float, fuck up your boat.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It won't. The majority of plastic pollutants are tiny pellets called nurdles, the larger stuff is only a danger to bigger organisms...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Expected a zoidberg post from title. Was disappointed.then not

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If I remember correctly, a while ago the plan was to catch the suspended particles with giant nets, and it was obviously not going to work

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

on top of that surface trash is not a big problem in the wide ocean.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wish I could just get excited, but I'm very skeptical.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

It's this kind of bullshit skepticism that leads to inaction. What is wrong with feasibility testing in practice?!

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

I'm an environmental activist, so it hasn't lead me to inaction. Find that too often we look for easy solution instead of changing behavior.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

The problem already exists, whether we change now or not. A solution being easy has no relation to its effectiveness.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm pretty sure it's damn near impossible to change the behavior of the entire world, especially not anytime soon, so in the meantime..

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, a change in behavior is not going to remove the plastic already in the ocean, so both are necessary.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I wonder if any sea creatures will get caught up in it too...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It only sits on the surface I think, so it shouldn't trap animals unless they're really dumb.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Page 20-21 executive summary - most creatures will go under it

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gotcha. I did not read that detail. Well that's good to know!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why - did you even read the article? They didn't just go - hey, maybe I'll just throw a big boom in the ocean; they actually did research.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Research is not infallible. There are probably going to be unknown consequences and/or obstacles during the implementation of this project.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I understand, like i said I hope it works. I feel like it will either fail due to materials, or miss a majority of the trash(size/position)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

1) Out of curiosity, why state your skepticism at all? The organization has healthy skepticism, yet they have done their due diligence...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

because I am an engineer, being skeptical of "amazing" things is kinda our MO, it isn't meant to be mean, just thorough.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2) and yet they have decided to proceed allowing their prototype to prove the principle in practice. If it fails, what harm has it done?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

3) If it is successful, consider how huge the success would be? General skepticism in the face of data is toxic to progress.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It'd only work for surface debris. Much of the garbage is suspended throughout the water column.

10 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

I'ts not perfect but it's a great start.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You should really read the whole article and look up more information and research. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's definitely the closest thing to a perfect solution that anyone has come up with. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They did feasibility testing and found that a large percentage of the plastic only goes down about 10 meters.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

This guy's skimmer wouldn't catch that.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Sorry I was thinking in feet and said meters. Page 23-24 of this feasibility study.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I'm afraid of them getting crap from someone PETA-like because it "reduces" wildlife problems but doesn't eliminate them.

10 years ago | Likes 133 Dislikes 5

Fuck PETA

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Hopefully they'll understand the short term vs long term cost/benefit

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

You lost them at the word "understand".

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I worked on this project during the feasibility study! A lot of crticism from env. groups for that exact reason. So frustrating 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

But the microscopic plastic particles!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That moment when some kid does a better job than the entire PETA organization, so everyone should tell them to shut the fuck up.

10 years ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 1

Might want to pick a better example than doing better than PETA. PETA sucks terribly.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exactly, not doing this would probably do more harm to animals in the long run right?

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

From the number of sea birds I have seen die due to ingested plastic. Definitely.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

without question.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I really hope this project is a success and garbage islands become nothing more than an embarrassing factoid in our future history books.

10 years ago | Likes 3754 Dislikes 8

That dictionary extension. I just installed earlier really came in handy.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

What I don't understand, is why not go to these islands and take care of them there, as well as setting these up to slow their progression.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

+1 totally agree

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Great Pacific Garbage Patch laughs at your puny intentions, as do the North Atlantic and Indian Ocean Garbage Patches.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This guy wouldnt be happy with that https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnLhWpy_nqI

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't worry, China will take them over by putting a bunch of sand underneath them.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

And then parking an artillery piece on the sand pile.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most of the garbage and plastic is floating in the ocean and on the bottom in broken down bits. Very little is actually on the surface /1

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

/2 but out of sight out of mind right? This kid will be a billionaire

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It won't succeed, for a number of reasons. The main one being this net's infinitesimally small size relative to the ocean's.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

But innovative tech like this is what we need more of. And, who knows, maybe with some development this project could do its job.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

BUT DIDNT YOU HEAR IF IT DOESNT WORK ON THE FIRST TIME ITS NOT WORTH TRYING AT ALL

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

China does not give a shit how much you clean... every day they dump like 1 ton new garbage into the ocean :)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

See news on the ozone layer, we can fix things if we just ignore those who say we can't.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

agreed

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And if it isn't, we can just add it to the pile!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Paris used to have shit rivers running through the middle of roads. Chamberpots wee emptied from windows, and people below needed 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

umbrellas ready, to avoid be㏌g covered ㏌ it.Now it's fancy as hell.We got past shitparis, and I'm optimistic that we can get past this.2/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My understanding is that most of the plastic in the oceans is pulverized by waves into tiny little particles that make up these "islands" 1/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and that they're not really islands. Just huge patches of these tiny particles of plastic. Super, super hard to remove from the water 2/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nice We just need to convince all the chemical and plastics companies to produce only biodegradable non-toxic goods. We have the technology.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There is too much garbage in the ocean, but there are no garbage islands. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ueSma1s0W8

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

right its not a literal island, just a highly concentrated zone due to ocean currents? tl-dr'd it

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah pretty much. But the trash that's concentrated in the area isn't even visible to the naked eye. Still a bad thing though.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah which was my main doubt about the technique above; its not going to catch particulates.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pedantry mode activate! A "factoid" is a term for something believable but untrue. (Hi @misleadinginformation ) A small fact is a "factlet".

10 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 4

In America, both are acceptable. Factoid means a small bit of information. I'm not sure about other countries, though.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

i actually didnt know this. thanks!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There are no 'garbage islands'. Just areas of ocean where the concentration of trash is very high.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 6

And it's not even really "trash" it's mostly small particles of plastic, which it doesn't seem this idea does much about

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I know with oil there's a dozen companies out there with 'great ideas' to clean it up that are completely useless. You saw heaps of them /1

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

during the BP disaster - Kevin Costner backed one of them. People with loads of money who want to help but don't know what they're doing. //

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yeah you dont even know youre in the middle of one sometimes. theyre not always visible although so highly polluted.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, we're just going to launch it into space in the end, you know, let them deal with our trash in a thousand years.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Like burning rivers.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Like our Imgur posts about historical factoids?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The garbage islands really aren't that bad for the environment. Tons of marine life survive because of them. Sea turtles for example

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

Elaborate on how the sea turtles benefit. I'm ignorant on the subject

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They rely on floating debris for shelter for their first few years of life. This invention will remove both good and bad debris.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Garbage is often lethal to sea animals such as sea turtles and sea birds. They mistake plastic bags for jellyfish which causes problems (1)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Er, I thought one of the biggest dangers to sea turtles was that they accidentally ingest plastic trash and die?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Ingestion isn't that big of a deal, getting caught in something is the issue. Baby turtles will spend their first years amongst debris

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

While the teeny tiny plastic particles are often times ingested leading to slow deaths of starvation. (I'm a biologist) (2)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We are not talking about particles of plastic we are talking about clusters of debris, which harbor many animals. I am an env biologist.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I understand that. But what of those creatures who get caught up in the debris? And what of the debris that degrades to those pieces? (1)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Studies are now beginning on the harmful toxins released from the plastic degradation. Look into it if you're interested, American Che(2).

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Chemical Association had a few BRIEF overviews. Personally, I think the harmful effects of these "islands" severely outweigh benefits. (3)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2) He can't exactly address your or my feelings, or studies which are in their infancy, on that same level.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1) Seems likely to me, too, but he relayed scientific information as the scientific community now understands it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

'factoid'... Bravo.

10 years ago | Likes 310 Dislikes 10

Context matters.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

North American definition of the world apparently means "a brief or trivial item of news and information". So, Spune is correct.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep. A lot of people nailed him for that.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

"North American definition" is a polite way to not call Americans dumb.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, that's another way of looking at it considering the Americans did butcher the English language, haha.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yikes... Learn the difference between fact and factoid people! Near-polar opposites!

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

The common use of factoid would lead me to use the word misnomer because there wouldn't be any confusion. Languages change man.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

While I do submit that is a better linguistic recourse, the current definition of factoid is still heavily tied to a speculatory requirement

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

'Over time and common use, factoid has assumed other meanings, particularly used to describe a brief or trivial item of news or information'

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

It's a misnomer to say that is a proper definition, when in it is in fact truncated. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=define%3Afactoid

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It was truncated because there's only a limited number of characters to work with. You were wrong, stop being such a child about it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Wait garbage islands are a thing?

10 years ago | Likes 417 Dislikes 8

All the islands together the amount of garbage forms a garbagre continent the size of Africa. We're not talking of a small problem.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Not an island. Lots of trash over a large area. Pictures from the searches mentioned are propaganda. It's not good, but it's not that.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Nope. Just areas of ocean with high concentrations of trash. The water is disgusting, but they're not islands.

10 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 6

No, not really. They don't really form islands or anything. It's just a buzzword. Try finding a legit picture of it that isn't zoomed in :P

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

No, not actually. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ueSma1s0W8

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yep. Where currents meet, a lot of garbage will gather. One o the biggest is in the middle of the Pacific. Its as sad as it is huge

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

Its right next to whore island

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

More like garbage soup. You cant walk on it, if that's what you mean.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I believe Napoleon was banished to one of them. Legend says his spirit lives on. I REFUSE to believe this RUBBISH, though. Sorry I'm trashed

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it's not really an island, more like, lots of tiny bits of plastic circulating over 1000s of miles. if it was an island, be easy to clean

10 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 0

well there are large patches of garbage within the gyres

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 18

Can you cite that? I haven't been able to find evidence of a large patch anywhere.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

no sorry, but my confidence is shrinking as i seatch on

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

What are they teaching or withholding at school nowadays? I have known about it for at least 15 years now.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 8

I know right

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well, everything kids learn is decided by the politics of their district's school board

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

Yeah I know. I am trying to kid myself that politics has no impact on school boards; you know, that there is no such thing...

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Sigh. I had a friend who was taught creationism in biology class in PUBLIC SCHOOL in southern IL. Fucked up.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

google the great garbage patch

10 years ago | Likes 116 Dislikes 3

It's the Great Garbage Patch, Charlie Brown!

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Now I'm sad... Geez

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Hard not to be sad after seeing the reality. So much worse that most people don't know about them.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Don't be sad. We found a possible solution.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

The images shown when googling "great garbage patch" are not pictures of the Great Pacific garbage patch.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I just found pictures of your mom.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it throws up practically the same results. Source: I just did it.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Googling "Great Pacific garbage patch" does not give you correct pictures either. It's millions of pieces spread throughout the Ocean.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The concentration of Garbage is: 5.1 kilograms per square kilometer of ocean area. Definitely a problem, but the images are wrong.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Google north pacific garbage gyre. There are four other major ones :/

10 years ago | Likes 286 Dislikes 3

Is the true Atlantis.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Terrible

10 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

First time I actually googled it. Turns out it's not what one imagines when they hear "garbage island".

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

More like a garbage patch. Wouldn't want the babies they pull from it though :/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Those of you who downvote @noobule for saying the truth need to do some damn research. Goddamn downvote sheep.

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 4

He is technically correct, but they are GIANT trash heaps the size of islands...that isn't enough?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

There are no "giant" trash heaps the size of islands. It's just a bunch of buzzwords used to describe this issue. But, there is trash (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, there aren't. It's a *high concentration* of trash in the ocean. Like you're in the middle of no one and you start seeing plastic /1

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

and its not the biggest problem, thats micro plastic particles eaten by animals

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

they are not islands

10 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 35

Gyre Lawrence

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dunno why people downvoted, but you're right. They're not actual visible islands above water...

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Some imgurians are very fickle creatures.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Correct. I don't know why you're being downvoted. because you had no source? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ueSma1s0W8

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

It's because imgur is changing and becoming downvote sheeple. When they see negative they add to it. Also they don't like the truth. Sad.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

You're getting downvoted too what the hell is there a Holy Church of the Garbage Islands or something

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Now they're downvoting you? Lol wtf Imgur.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well, upvotes for you guys then. It's not like I'm saying garbage in the ocean is ok. I'm just saying the islands don't exist.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0