Scumbag Universe.

Feb 3, 2017 2:16 PM

TheGhostOfHarambe

Views

101318

Likes

1627

Dislikes

91

If it did not it would not.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The universe can be both infinite and have a defined size. We just need something to compare to it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fun story, the universe is finite.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

lol. beyond human logic

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I posted this and got down voted like Pluto in 2006

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's infinite BECAUSE it's constantly expanding...right?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Am I the only one who finds this creepy?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Anyone that's troubled by this should look up Hilbert's paradox of the Grand Hotel. It illustrates the discrete version of this phenomenon.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

for some weird reason every time I hear/read "the universe is infinite" I think about the Ancients in Stargate

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

This tickles my fuckin brain dude.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just like my gut.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

some infinities are bigger than others

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I remember this alien from ST:TOS

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

maybe it's infinite because it keeps expanding...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought it was a Christmas tree.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But the universe isn't infinite

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The universe it self isn’t expanding, it stays infinite, but the planets and other stuff are moving further apart

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think the only solution to how space can be infinite is if it doesn't actually exist and this is all a computer program-ish //the matrix

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It would be amazing to be able to explore the universe

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You can. A very, very, VERY small part of it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's the point, it's not infinite.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So if the universe constantly expands then every instant it is growing bigger, and every time we refer about the universe we're talking /1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Observe it?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

About it in that instant, which has passed before we've even uttered the first syllable, so we're always talking about it in the past /2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now everything that is expanding or changing can be defined in size by referencing its size now as what it used to be plus a "unit" so /3

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is it infinite if we know it's expanding since infinity is simply a quantity to great to measure based on the scope of the method used to/4

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

From what I understand the universe is expanding because of the Big Bang but gravity will eventually reverse it so that it'll contract.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

We thought this was true until 1998, but the rate of expansion is increasing despite gravity. We call the cause of this "Dark Energy."

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's very interesting. So the acceleration is increasing despite negative acceleration from gravity?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yep. We observed the increasing, noted that our model suggested it shouldn't be, and concluded there must be something favoring expansion.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I find it fascinating how we're so certain that we've figured out the laws of physics then another natural phenomena is discovered.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you haven't read it, "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" by Thomas Kuhn is a little dated, but still the landmark piece.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm infinite. You heard of hell well I was sent from it.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But... that's an oximoron.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

No it's not

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yup, an infinite thing can't have anywhere to expand to. Nor can it have limits of any sort, or it becomes finite.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

not quite, there are different sizes of infinite, as crazy as that sounds.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

You can only measure something with limits, which makes them finite. There is no edge to put your measure on infinite.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

144 characters is not enough space to explain so watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JrrN3vOasQ

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it will explain also how you can measure something without limits

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Isn't it the case that the universe is an expanding bubble and beyond that lies nothing, not even space?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Then what's it expanding into? Isn't "space" by definition an empty area that can be filled by matter?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No. Space is something, not something tangible to us, but still something. Einstein called it ''Space-time''.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Space-time is different than space. "Space: a continuous area or expanse that is free, available, or unoccupied"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

What if one day all the lights in the night sky just go dark and all we can see are the planets in our solar system because thats all that's

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Left

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Then nothing will change for us, unless you're still using the north Star to navigate

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

But still then we'd know we're totally alone

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And it could be possible right?!? I mean technically all the light we see I the night sky takes billions of years to get here so like whatif

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

For them all to "disappear from the sky" at the same time, they would all have to be extinguished at different times (some billions of years

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

apart) in order for all of that light coming to our planet to end in sync.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Except all you know is you can't see them, not that they are gone. Do you think they are gone when it's cloudy?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ok I clearly didn't word this well hahaha

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." -Albert Einstein

9 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 1

I use this quote constantly at work. The second most important one-liners ol' Al spit out.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There are like a lot of things in the universe that we can see dude

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

There are like a lot of things in the universe that we can see dude

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

There are like a lot of things in the universe that we can see dude

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

There are 10,000,000,000,000 particles in the universe that we can observe

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 18

How many particles are there in the universe that we can observe?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

There are 10,000,000,000,000 particles in the universe that we can observe

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 19

How many particles are there in the universe that we can observe?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

There are like a lot of things in the universe that we can see dude

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

There are 10,000,000,000,000 particles in the universe that we can observe

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 19

Let me guess, "an unknown error has ocurred", right?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

How many particles are there in the universe that we can observe?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

There are like a lot of things in the universe that we can see dude

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

There are like a lot of things in the universe that we can see dude

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

There are like a lot of things in the universe that we can see dude

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

There are 10,000,000,000,000 particles in the universe that we can observe

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 18

Yo mama took the ugly ones and put them into one nerd.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

How many particles are there in the universe that we can observe?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

at least 3

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Space is infinite. The universe is not.

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 6

This

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well it's only infinite BECAUSE it's expanding. When it stops expanding, it's not infinite

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I was looking for this comment.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's more complicated. IIUC, the universe is not "some bunch of shit populating space"; the universe IS space. Space is limited and growing.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

An analogy I heard was that the universe was like a balloon being inflated, and stars are points drawn on its surface.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Universe is a galactic address, hence the multiverse theory. The word "space" literally means area with availability to be occupied

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The universe is infinite. The observable universe is not.*

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No, afaik the universe is larger than the observable universe, but still limited in size.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What limits the universes size exactly?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Conservation of energy

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

please explain.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So in short, the universe may, or may not, "wrap around" itself. Most likely it doesn't though.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Honestly, fuck if I know. After googling, it'd seem that the universe may be curved (imagine Earth surface, except 3D rather than 2D). 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

However some more googling showed that the current theory is that the universe is "flat" and therefore infinite. Damn, seems I was wrong 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Heh, yeah, there are several different ways in which one might suggest the universe is "finite." Wasn't sure what we were talking about. 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Worry not. Mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Everytime I think about this, I go insane

9 years ago | Likes 259 Dislikes 3

"It's all relative" Is a pretty good way to stop your head hurting

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Everytime I think about you I go insane

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Does anyone else get irrationally angry over these parts of science because you just cant wrap your head around it and refuse to accept it?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And when a neutron decays to a proton it does so by emitting a particle 100 times larger than the original neutron.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Entropy we are moving towards a point of homeostasis

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Every time I think of you I go blind

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

what if our universe expanded into another universe?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That wouldn't be exactly expansion

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can think about it as space getting less 'dense'. There aren't borders, but the density still keeps going down.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Also, if times is standing still when you travel at the speed of light, how can photons have beginning and end.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 2

Oh my god

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Well time doesn't actually stand still at the speed of light, because then light years wouldn't be valid measurement.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Because time is only at a standstill to the photon's relative frame. If you could freeze time, you would still age while it's frozen, right?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Static is the sound of the universe growing, and that drives me insane.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

About 1% or less is from the big bang- the rest is from stars, lightning, etc.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Turn static on your TV, 1% of that noise is radiation left over from the big bang.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If it wasn't expanding, would it still infinite?

9 years ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 0

"still"? xD

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I think it's that vacuum is infinite, but not matter

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yup

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

Stop, my brain can only get so hurt.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Well technically there's only so much energy in the universe so our universe is finite. But if the multiverse idea is right then infinite

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Negative. It's very likely the universe is infinite. It's more accurate to say there's only a certain energy density.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Multiple universes could be a thing.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One theory is that all "alternate universes" are actually in this one, but they expand away fast enough it'd be impossible to reach them.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is there even an alternate universe where alternate universes don't exist.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Asking the real questions

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Asking the real questions.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Are they just travelling away from us in different "directions" that aren't euclidian? Or is it more like infinite potentialities?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I believe it was the non euclidean directions but it's been a long time since I read that paper

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That just sounds like it's hitching a ride on how superclusters are all just spreading further apart from each other

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Possibly. If you want to read into it, I'm pretty sure Brian Greene wrote about it in one of his books

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes it would infinite

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

at least two

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Two whole infinite.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

We did it Reddit.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0