What does "boobs on the ground" even mean anyway?

Sep 27, 2014 4:45 AM

CarolinHR

Views

569229

Likes

13770

Dislikes

358

And Dubya Bush used to regularly salute holding his dog in his arms. Where was the outrage then from the right? Stupid non-issue.

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

And that man is your democratically elected President of your country. How about you show HIM some fucking respect you fuckwit.

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 8

This whole entire thing is completely un news worthy. What is Jon Stew's obsession with FOX. Get over it.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

"What is Jon Stew's obsession with FOX?" They provide him with material to work with.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Boobs on the ground." Courtesy of "head up the arse."

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

how can you be obligated to salute someone, everyone is equal, the fact he does salute them shows he respects them, fuck your cliches!!!

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They make me so angry and Im not even an american

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrqaw7lB76c This is the original FOX News report, it's actually the biggest piece of shit I've ever seen

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Chief doesn't need to salute, the fact he salutes is already a showcase of respect.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Exactly. Why don't people get that. He's at the top of the tree. Shit doesn't flow up hill. He's like the ultimate person that needs saluted

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"The buck stops here" indeed.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As Colbert put it: "it's not the boobs on the ground, it's the pair in the air"

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Fox News. Not even once.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

What is the military protocol for saluting in regards to civilians? I thought it was rude to salute if you didn't serve.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm prob wrong, but I think pres has some sort of military ranking since like he decides when to go to war etc. Not sure though???

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You are essntially correct, but it's a matter of protocol and etiquette, and those kinds of things evolve or are judgement calls.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A President or any civilian is not supposed to salute. It is a privilege reserved for military members in good standing.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Oh hell no. Lmao Presidents are too be saluted. Go google up 600-25 army regs, the AFI 1-1, and all the other branches shit.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a European... Meh.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Europeans say 'meh'?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When we're talking about American politics, yeah. Often, it's the only apt word to describe your clown-car-disguised-as-national-politics.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*mic drop*

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

Jon Stewart was spot on.

11 years ago | Likes 1480 Dislikes 39

And also scoring points.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

I agree. Not a fan of his but he really hit the nail on the head here

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

*is

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

i would vote for him as pres

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 7

As always.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

As usual.

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Didn't think I'd say this when he took over but: Jon Stewart is WAY better than Craig Ferguson. There, I've said it.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

That was Craig Kilborn, not Ferguson....

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I always wonder why I never hear about their responses to Stewart when they get called out like that. I'd love to see them try.

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

they do respond but they usually just dismiss him as a comedian. Which he is. but they don't understand that doesn't actually discredit him.

11 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

See... there are boots. And there's ground. So once you put the boots on the ground, you have BOOTS ON GROUND.

11 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 7

This is how I imagine the father from "My big fat greek wedding" would describe things.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

He said BOOBS.

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Weird cause that refers to deploying an army. And this was an aerial attack

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

That's what bothered me the most, she's air force, boots on the ground refers to infantry, so his stupid joke doesn't even make sense.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, fuck that guy, I'm definitely not voting for him next time!

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

My first chuckle of the day. Thank you.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean, a latte? I'd have thought he'd have had better taste in coffee than that!

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

srsly. only a macchiato for commander in chief.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't know how Jon has done this for so long. My stress levels would be through the fucking roof, wading through this shit all the time.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Money money money money. MONAY!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

respect

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He wades through the same shit as most of us, but he gets paid to make jokes about it.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah! Fuck that guy!

11 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 6

Even as a conservative, I really hate Fox News.

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

As a Libertarian... I don't. I just understand they're not a news organization.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

any one notice him kinda extra angry the past few nights

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

That's Stewart's secret. He's always angry.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Thank you for not giffing it

11 years ago | Likes 2157 Dislikes 19

-sincerely, mobile users.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

As a Finn, I salute you!

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

As a non-mobile user, I find gifs very annoying, especially when the subtitles change throughout the gif. It just makes it hard to read.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You are the hero mobile users need.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's pronounced jiffing.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

NO IT'S NOT YOU UNCULTURED SWINE

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

LOL ...giffing...

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

COFFING!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yiffing...

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm currently redownloading Skyrim and totes thought they were just taking forever to load.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

11 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 2

He should've had that pepsi cup in his hands.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

For once, I can actually read one of these posts

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

some people just dont gif a f***

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...a chance

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I do what I can

11 years ago | Likes 299 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted Oct 22, 2016 11:26 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

more or less

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You da real MVP

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Its sad that has to be pointed out

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Ramone?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You are my hero

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, you didn't. And we thank you.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Out of respect, I latte-salute you.

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

SO DISRESPECTFUL OMG

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Make love to us Randy pls.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Was that a TPB reference?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Southpark reference.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You da real mvp

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Imgur, where we thank people for not fucking up the basics.. Jesus fuck, who cares.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 17

politeness and courtesy gets you a long way.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's more like some retardation "hurr durr thank you for wiping your ass".

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Every mobile user

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

okay, i have not seen the actual salute until this gif and that was nowhere near as bad as i thought it would be.

11 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 4

i guess i can kind of see how some military serviceman might have something to say about that. but EXTENSIVE MEDIA COVERAGE? no.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't even understand why some servicemen would be mad. He's the superior officer and isn't even required to salute them.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah you would think he threw the coffee in their face and back handed a bald eagle by how outraged they all are. fuckin-a

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

What DOES "boobs on the ground" mean? Ignoring the blatant sexism, it doesn't even make any fucking sense. She wasn't on the ground...

11 years ago | Likes 747 Dislikes 14

Colbert "It's 'Pair in the air' "

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly. If you're going to make an arrogant disgusting just atLEAST make God damn sense

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

A poorly executed, far reaching jab at 'boots on the ground'. A shitty jab at a woman flying a jet.

11 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 2

especially far reaching considering "boots on the ground" means any soldier NOT in a plane (or on a ship)

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

that's the joke

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And even if she were her boobs wouldn't be

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It makes sense if you consider the fact that Eric Bolling (and everyone on The Five) is a fucking moron.

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Plus, she was flying, so it should be "boobs in the air."

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

right! if you're going to make a tasteless joke at least make it a good one

11 years ago | Likes 286 Dislikes 8

Or better yet, don't make one at all!

11 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 6

Even Stephen Colbert made a joke (sarcastically) "That's obviously a pair in the air."

11 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

it means "I'm 12...hehe boobs"

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Those guys aren't deep thinkers 'boobs sounds sort of like boots' is the extent of the thinking. Also -can't make legible websites

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm NOT defending the douche, but it's a wordplay on "boots on the ground". It's probably his idea of humor.

11 years ago | Likes 174 Dislikes 15

Pretty sure the guy was a comedian just making a joke, he wasnt really being serious.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

the wordplay is obvious, but that doesn't mean it makes any sense.

11 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 7

the *attempt* at wordplay is obvious, since it didn't really succeed at being clever.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

If it were anyone but fox news, I'd say no one would make that bad a word play.

11 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

"Nobody would make that bad a word play." You don't Imgur much, do you.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

The point of airstrikes it that it's not "boots on the ground". They were aiming for the lowest hanging fruit and still missed

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

If she was part of the infanty and pinned down in a foxhole, it might at least have made a small shred of sense, although no less offensive.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

ah.. I thought it was like she left boobs away on the ground and became a man on the sky like she was worthless as a soldier before.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

And if her boobs were on the ground she would be crawling around on the floor. Hardly an effective fighting technique. Guy's a twat.

11 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 5

It should be a pair in the air!

11 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 4

See this guy gets it

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yeah he stole it from Colbert, and he gets it, so yeah

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

-Stephen Colbert

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

upvote

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Source: http://thedailyshow.cc.com/videos/b7hxzd/the-way-we-war

11 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Starts about 4:30

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Dang they got rekt. Too bad the gifset doesn't just who this whole thing. It was brilliant.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks! I always hate trying to read/understand so many GIFs at one.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"We're sorry, but this video isn't available in your location." Well, fuck you too

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Seems like you've fund the source Cymist has provided so I hope you're good now.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*found

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Use Google Chrome with the Hola extention! Then you can access everything anywhere :)

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Use a proxy to pretend to be in the US -- I use Hola, a plugin for Firefox. Also lets me watch Doctor Who on BBC's website. :-)

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes really? Self reading this in your comments gallery,you can watch Dr. Who!! Read this comment chain

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

sauce for all us non-Mericans that can't watch C-C streams https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=4RS-gxxPWCE#t=261

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

You rock

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

thank you!

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You da real MVP son

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

i salute you, latte or no

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As an ex-serviceman, fuck that guy and fuck yeah Jon Stewart!

11 years ago | Likes 99 Dislikes 15

I'm a Conservative, What Branch were you in?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

USAF, and I'm a moderate independent.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Kinda weird, Marines,Navy, and most Army I see are Conservative, Air Force, Coast Guard, are more liberal...Fuuuunky :o

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I can see it. It does pay to differentiate fiscal or social conservative too. I'm fiscally conservative, socially liberal.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Indeed. I can see it.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I appreciate your service, man!

11 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 3

As you'd been downvoted, I think you have a downvote troll on you.

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Oh phew, I was worried that you had downvoted it because I offended you in some way. Downvote trolls I can handle

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

One of the other servicemen got downvoted, so maybe it's just a troll on this image. It's hard to offend me!

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is also why I hate Fox News with a passion. Fucking twats.

11 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

and your opinion hehe

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

For real. As a current seviceman, I don't give a shit that he didn't salute properly. Also, fuck Fox and everything they stand for.

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Someone downvoted this, they must like Fox.... I pivoted to pull it back up.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

love it mr. platypus

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I love you internet stranger, have a great day.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

aww you too!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*Faux News

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Veteran chiming in here. You are obligated to salute a superior officer when you see one and not half-ass it. 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 89 Dislikes 5

appreciate your service and for your insight

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

The CIC is the superior officer, right?

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

The CIC is THE Superior Officer for Armed Forces

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

2/2 That officer is not obligated to salute you back especially if he is preoccupied.

11 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 0

Thanks for the info and your service! :) My dad said the same thing but wasn't sure if it applied w/ American military (vietnamese vet)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Funny how many don't know that. But I suppose that's one of the little details being in the service teaches you.

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Also, thank you for your service!

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Agreed, and to further add the president isn't an officer but a civilian. thanks for you service!

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I was thinking that was the case. It would take forever for a general to walk around if he had to salute everyone.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Actually. It states in AFI 1-1 and army regs 600-25 that when saluted to return the salute. But thats for military, not civis like pres.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Isn't the president the commander in chief though? He is military.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A salute is a sign of mutual respect. In the air force at least, the officers always salute back. That rule doesn't apply for civilians 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

like the SecDef or President. We salute them, but they are under no obligation to return that salute because they aren't military.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Eisenhower didn't salute when he was president. And he used to be a general in the military. Regan was the first to salute troops.

11 years ago | Likes 3040 Dislikes 20

That's cus Reagan is badass.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

The tradition of always saluting was started by Reagan. Eisenhower did salute when he was addressing many troops, not to random soldiers.

11 years ago | Likes 134 Dislikes 1

So the tradition started with an actor?

11 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 5

An actor who may have been well into a descent into Alzheimer's.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Since the president is the commander in chief, isn't everyone else in the military lower ranking? Meaning he doesn't need to salute?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure you're wrong about this. Eisenhower was a military officer, he saluted.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He also oversaw Iran Contra.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

You watched Real Time last night, didn't you.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They definitely watched Real Time last night.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And had arguably less military experience then many previous presidents. Almost like he was an actor.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well, the GOP worships Reagan, so...

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Eisenhower understood, as a military man, that as POTUS you don't have to salute anyone.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

but he did salute soldiers. frequently. this is still dumb though.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The thing here is superior officers are not required to salute, but people watch a lot of movies, and they always salute in the movies.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

lot of movies, not a lot of books. there's the problem

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Eisenhower DID salute. That he didn't is a myth. He didn't salute all the time but he did salute.

11 years ago | Likes 115 Dislikes 5

He saluted only on special occasions but in general didn't want to salute because he wasn't in uniform.

11 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 0

I could understand why he didn't always salute he was a general before then even. Saluting everyone has to get old after awhile.

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

If the president or even just a general took the time to properly return salutes they wouldn't have any time to do their jobs.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Plus he was the top dog in the military. I'm sure he could get away with not saluting.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You'd think but even supreme commander subordinates to CIC. And here obama is catching pointless hell for it.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because Regan was an idiot. You never salute out of uniform and civies never salute ANYONE.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

That is not true. The president is in uniform every day. It's called a suit.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's patently wrong. That's not a uniform for one, and two it's not THE uniform. As in a military one.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

For me it's either do it, or don't. He just gives a half ass one.

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 83

My second most downvoted comment. Congrats to me, I guess.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ugh.

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Ha. I've seen military officers provide the shittiest salutes. I've seen cell phone salutes and latte salutes as well. Get over it.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

So have I. But considering his position, considering he's always being watched, he should set the standard, and be beyond reproach.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Salutes are done more lazily by people much lower down the chain. If you had served, you'd know this.

11 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

I have served, and considering Obama's at the top of the chain his should be asking the least lazy.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I sincerely doubt it.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

*among, not asking

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can agree with this.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 35

Whoa there, friend. You have to be careful not to agree with unpopular opinions. Wouldn't want you thinking for yourself <_<

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thank you.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My thinking is that over-saluting is killing the meaning behind it. He's POTUS, others are supposed to salute him. Chain of command. (1/2)

11 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

He's saluting back.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I prefer the more minimalist approach by DDE. The rest is all for show and for votes. (2/2)

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Officers are supposed to return the salute. Nobody likes to salute anyway, officers hate it as much as enlisted

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And civilians doing it can sometimes feel a bit demeaning. He made a mistake, who cares, those marines could probably give a shit

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's actually not true; he did on many occasions. This is still dumb though.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thanks for this tidbit, genuinely interesting :)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

just to clarify to you: the presidents dont salute troops first. they return salutes. so troops didnt salute the presidents until Reagan

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait, aren't you supposed to only salute when you've got a cap with the national symbol on it, isn't the salute supposed to honour that?

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Only if you have a military uniform. People in the chain of command that aren't military (like the pres or secdef) have different rules

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nah, it's descended from the old knight-lifting-his-visor gesture. And you're only supposed to do it in uniform, but can be done without hat

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thank you for bringing thus up. Also, the presidential salute is not required even after Regan started it.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is because being part of the military he knew that you were only supposed to salute if you were in uniform.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wish you guys could have someone like Eisenhower to run things again.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Last good president, IMO.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

JFK, FDR, Clinton?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

FDR predated Eisenhower. JFK was objectively a worse president (albeit popular), and Clinton... well, maybe.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Got us into Vietnam, predated Ike, generally bad at foreign policy (good domestic though).

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The right would just scream "Socialist!" at him. Apparently his public highway system is too 'liberal' for them.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah damn socialist roads, imprisoning people in the freedom of driving where ever they want.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah, how dare that guy try to connect the cities of the US for easy transportation!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yo, imgurite, I'm real happy for you, and I'mma let you finish, but @IWannaHaveSexWithEveryone had the best comment of all time. 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Awww, you shouldn't have <3

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hate to do this to ya, but Roosevelt saluted troops before Reagan.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Eisenhower probably didn't salute because he wasn't in uniform. You cannot render a salute while in civvies but you can receive.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

and no president would salute his subordinates at all, they return salutes.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Commander in chief is the head of the military in uniform and out. Not arguing against you, just saying it's different for the president.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Under the Constitution the president is considered a civilian leader of the armed forces. He is not considered military.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Adding to that the president doesn't even have a uniform so the uniform rules of saluting are different. He can do whatever he wants, really

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The point I was trying to make though was in the military they tell you not to salute out of uniform. It could have been force of habit.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yeah, as in hes not subject to the ucmj?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just wanted to clarify "a general in the military." He was Supreme Commander of Allied Forces in Europe during WW2. What a title.

11 years ago | Likes 1004 Dislikes 1

Only in Wolfenstein would you not want to be called that. Pretty much the guy who blew it for everyone in that world. I need to get out more

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The modo planned, organized, and executed d-day. The only people he should ever have to salute are Medal of Honor recipients. Like a boss.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Why did I think for a MOMENT that I'd be the 1st one to point that out. Thank you, sir.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The only thing I heard in my mind when I read your comment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJFRLGfuZto&feature=player_detailpage#t=75

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oooh man. I just had a thought... What if the UEF was started by Eisenhower? Oh shit son!

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sounds cool, like 2nd in command next to the CiC.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I like Ike.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Everybody likes Ike.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

George Washington still automatically outranks him :P

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Was there a Supreme Commander in the Pacific?

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Technically it was Louis Mountbatten, a British Admrial, but the top American admiral in the pacific was Douglas MacArthur.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There were two: Admiral Chester Nimitz & General Douglas MacArthur: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Theater_of_Operations

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Five stars... yowza.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

whoa! bad ass! that's the title i get when i save the world from the soviets in red alert! i did not know that it actually existed!

11 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 2

red aleeeerrttt

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It STILL exists. No one has really needed to fill the command. Is traditionally only occupied by a five star general

11 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

The current NATO Supreme Allied Commander of Europe is USAF General Phillip Breedlove.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

YEAH! Red alert!

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

that brings up a good point, though... why is the president- the commander-in-chief- saluting at all? doesn't he outrank literally everyone?

11 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 6

He does outrank everyone, that's why everyone HAS to salute him first, and he can either return one or not. He doesn't HAVE to, but he does

11 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

he returns the salute the same way a commanding/any officer would.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

subordinate initiates the salute out of respect for his superior. The superior returns the salute out of respect for the subordinate. simple

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

According to the Constitution, the president, while CIF, is a civilian.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Did you mean CIC - Commander-in-Chief? And please cite that part of the Constitution?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think you meant Commander-in-Chief...and you should cite that part of the Constitution. Because I think you're incorrect.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's murky. In uniform, you salute superiors and return them out of respect. Out of uniform, it's still respectful to return a salute. 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Gate guards will salute officers who are in cars and out of uniform. It feels odd, but it's a little rude to not return that salute too. 2/3

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you're going to salute, however, it shouldn't be half-hearted, because that looks far worse. Either salute properly, or don't at all. 3/3

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

fox is so blatantly sexist and racist idk why/how anyone watches that shit.

11 years ago | Likes 788 Dislikes 62

Because they're racist and sexist. They fucking love that shit.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Because people are dumb and are unable to think for themselves.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

If you've been watching it for a while, you don't notice. My dad watches and my mom has to hear it, and she stopped noticing

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Colbert calls them the "Cocks on Fox."

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because it reinforces their sexist and racist views. They're preaching to the choir at this point.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You do realize the US still has a lot of racists and sexists, right? They love this shit, it tells them they're right.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

because there are a lot of sexist and racist people

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

There are a lot of incredibly stupid Americans, which is why those news networks still exist even though they're absolute trash.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Mostly to confirm their own personal sexist & racist beliefs.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

church. also ketchup chips are my jam

11 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 11

Chips or crisps? French fries or potato chips?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Are you British? Pretty sure he meant ketchup flavored potato chips. No offense.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

ALL American 24hr news programming is biased, sexist and perpetuate racism and fear. They are all worthless shit stacks

11 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 5

yeah, my post was coming from a Canadian perspective, where our News stations seem to be at least a little more subtle and way more liberal

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'll ask my parents next time I visit. They read everything Bill O-Riley makes.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

I personally watch it as parody, and then feel kind of sad later because some people don't realize that 99% of the show is for the ratings.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

There's this ~70 yr old woman who crawls on the treadmill and turns all the T.V.s to Fox "news". She blasts this racist propaganda at 1 mph

11 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 9

I live in the bible belt and there is always one TV in the cardio section of my gym on FOX, but ALL the TVs? ALL OF THEM?! For fuck's sake.

11 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 3

I work for the USMC in New Orleans. That's the default website on most computers and Fox is on ALL TVs in the hallways.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

FTFY: For fox' sake.

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Old white guys. Seriously, Fox's age demographics are skewed heavily to the high end.

11 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 5

My dad watches it every day. He's 84. Your logic checks out.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And their wives and widows.

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Because your country has a high population percentage of blatant sexists and racists. So they pander to those brainless fuck sponges.

11 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 13

Off-topic, but I actually have fuck sponges in my medicine cabinet.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

First, I agree with you. But second, the US is the LEAST racist country I've ever been to, and I've traveled a bit.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Sadly true. Most also consider themselves good religious people.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

hey i'm canadian! aka why i'm so bewildered by this. our most conservative party is in gov rn, and it's still more liberal than US democrats

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

defined as an unelectable far right candidate. Nearly everyone in US politics would when transposed in to the UK system.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Their country** The Americans are nuts. Even though Obama is considered "ooh evil liberal socialist" in the US. In the UK he would be

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Right?! Literally half of America and their views terrify me. They're all about freedom, but are against basic human rights. so infuriating

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Same reason people watch MSNBC. People like to be told what they want hear and told that their beliefs are the right ones.

11 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 16

Comparing MSNBC to Fox News is like comparing marijuana to meth.

11 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 7

MSNBC is slanted left, I don't dispute that. But Fox is vile, hateful, blatantly racist and sexist, and thus IMO in a category of their own.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

MSNBC has been busted countless times editing audio tapes and videos to push an agenda. They have given blatant racists like Al Sharpton 1/?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

his own show! They have manipulated stories to incite race conflict and to inflame and promote violence. They are both disgusting. 2/?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

msnbc does not boldfaced lie though. obama is a muslim. obama is a black militant. obama is communist. ACA death panels. all fox lies.

11 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 15

I think you have to ask yourself if you've fallen in to the same trap those fox news viewers have.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 12

MSNBC is certainly biased, yes. But Fox makes shit up in a way MSNBC does not. So, bias? Sure. Overt disdain? Sure. Blatant invention? No.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

MSNBC has been busted countless times with doctoring videos and audiotapes to push agendas. They absolutely tell downright falsehoods. 1/?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I want to be clear. Fox news if not equally bad, certainly very close. But the idea that msnbc isn't as bad is just insane 2/?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I have a feeling you've never actually watched fox news.

11 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 14

As someone who has watched Fox News, they make allegations like this often enough for criticism to be valid. The viewers are much worse.

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Fox news in indefensible. But what scares me are the people that recognize that, but think MSNBC is defensible. How will we ever improve 1/?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

when people don't recognize hypocrisy that is so obvious, simply because it agrees with them. 2/?

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

Studies have shown MSNBC to be even worse than Fox. They are both horrible and neither deserve your defense.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 15

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

ah, the old 'studies have shown' line of bullshit. how about linking to these studies

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

I linked to an article that has links to the pew research studies...

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

It's a perfect network for the important racist and sexist demographic.

11 years ago | Likes 219 Dislikes 18

So most old people

11 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 5

The Republicans?

11 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 7

Yeah, it's not too surprising that Fox News are big in a country full of stupid people, racists and sexists.

11 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 11

*parts of a country

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Actually they are everywhere in the US. And as we have seen in recent events - everywhere in the world.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Really? Because I live in big gay multiracial California and this shit is still pervasive like you wouldn't believe.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

*most of the country

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

American imgurians, just so I'm clear.. you guys aren't actually offended by him saluting whilst holding a fucking drink right?

11 years ago | Likes 192 Dislikes 6

I'm not offended at all, I think not saluting someone is a closer human-to-human relation than all this Etiquette crap...

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Unfortunately, I know a lot of people that really are. Every time they bring it up I just say "who cares."

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

See an officer carrying food outside? Salute that dude. See an officer with a piss cup in his hand? Salute. I say bonus points for prez.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, only idiots. The right-wing portion of idiots, to be precise.

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

I'm not.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No its just some of the conservative dbags (I don't think all conservatives are dbags btw) saying anything neg they can about Obama

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Honestly I don't get it. He doesn't need to salute them. HE is the commander in chief. If anything it's very nice he tried to.

11 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

Absolutely correct. The superior has the option to salute, he's showing respect by making the effort, latte or no

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I have a ton of friends in the armed forces. Not a single one of them is offended.

11 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 4

My coworker is exmarine and he's kind of upset, but he acknowledges that presidents aren't required to salute. He mostly just dislikes Obama

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good lord, no.

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

It only matters how the people he was saluting feel about it i think. I don't think I have the right to be offended or not.

11 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

But... but getting offended for other people is what we DO these days!!!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As I said, being ex-service, I'm not. But there are a lot of retards who want any excuse to be offended by Obama. Any. Excuse. Possible.

11 years ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 7

Maybe our opinion his salute has nothing to do with our opinion of him in other regards.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 16

Bringing you out of the negatives. While that may be true, that just means you aren't one of those people I'm talking about.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He's president of the Fuggin U.S.A. And he's showing MAD respect by saluting the men and women who serve. I dun care HOW full his hands are.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, not even a little bit.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I'd like to know this. As a Brit, this just seems ridiculous.

11 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 4

Agreed.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

We're not offended at all. This is what happens when a political party owns a news station and their only job is contradict the president.

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Some people in the military are, only because if you give a salute don't half ass it. But most aren't, due to the simple fact he is a civi.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

NO. I'm Midwest America and I say he's fucking busy. He's simply acknowledging their presence. It doesn't need to be perfect. Fox sucks.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

no

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As somebody who's currently on active duty in the US military: no.

11 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

Only a tiny bit. Salute right or not at all IMO.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The only ones that are offended are the ones that hate him in the first place. It's just the latest manufactured outrage.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck no, both his hands were obviously full. Iwgaf if he didn't salute at all, either.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Most of them are not. The rest are crazy.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

While I'm not fond of Obama, so fucking what? This isn't newsworthy. Obama holding a coffee is not newsworthy.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Two idiots on Fox News made a big deal and liberal news and Jon Stewart are milking it as though it's a huge deal so they get ratings.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 28

Everyone that is staunchly Republican in my feeds (FB, etc) are making a huge deal about it. But explain why Bush was okay to do the same.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

certain people in the US are. Imgur is majority leftist so you will not get the general feeling of the entire US. I would say some ppl are.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I am a teacher, I asked my students and they were 50/50 on the "issues" honestly it is overblown but that is the news media in us

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Surprise ANYone with a quick question, and you'll almost always get a 50/50 response. Ask your class about women's suffrage. You'll see.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just like ALL the American media outlets. it's deflection and misdirection. It's inconsequential and should have been ignored.

11 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 6

yuuuup, the media is set out to pit us against each other. Its how to weaken us.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I can't stand this statement - not all media outlets play this game. PBS, PRI and NPR *do not* do this.

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

PBS and NPR are just as bias as the rest, but not as petty. PRI is international.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Have their own biases? sure. Just as biased as commercially supported media? I wholeheartedly disagree with this statement.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Those all have a P in them, which I assume means Public. So they don't have the financial motivation to be trash that the others do.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

All of them have political bias, but at least they show it through political issues, not by flailing because someone was holding a coffee.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nope. But all of the main ones do. They blow up these pointless social issues to distract the sheep from the main problems.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nope. I'm offended that there are actually Americans that approve of the Fox News channel.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm not offended that he fucked it up. He's a civi, he hasn't gone through training on a "proper" salute and nor should he have too.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Disagree; the commander in chief should be trained on some military protocol.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

He should know protocol. But saluting isn't a requirement of the president. Reagan more or less made it tradition.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

shhh, she doesn't know that.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not at all. Getting anyone to awkwardly return a salute was a great game we played all the time. Officer carrying files? Salute him. 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Not at all, but I wish I could remember because I think in this same discussion Jon shows Bush doing the same thing while holding his dog.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No, we aren't. Some idiots *are* offended that our president is black, though.

11 years ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 10

I hate laziness like this. It seems to me that the people who bring race up the most (like tou) are the racists.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Except for all of those people who legitimately think he's a terrible president, and don't consider his skin color in the equation at all.

11 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 15

I think he honestly believed he'd get in and turn things around only to realize he didn't have the means. Makes me sad :/

11 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

Same. I voted for him thinking he'd stop most of the illegal NSA spying- MFW he doubled their budget day 1. >.>

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except he is too freaking moderate to generate any really hate. I mean they act like he's Bernie Sanders. He isn't bc if he was i'd be happy

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Yes, except for those three whole people.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 15

I wish I could upvote this a million times.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Buchanan, Harding or Bush were TERRIBLE. Obama is "meh" at best. He hasn't done much that he promised. But no equivalents of ACW, etc.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

As a general rule, ignore everything Fox News says or does.

11 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 5

Or post all of it here every time like always.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a conservative, please ignore it. We aren't all that way.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'd be curious to see some intelligent conservative media. Challenging my views would probably be good for them.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a liberal, yay <3

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Totally unrelated, but that's quite the username you have there.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thanks. It's usually tomhiddlestonsthirdtesticlewhyyesyoucantouchmeallyouwant ... but yoga pants.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a moderate, yay <3

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0