Not all heroes wear capes

Mar 9, 2017 1:14 AM

chiefholla

Views

438921

Likes

10983

Dislikes

463

Not all heroes wear capes

So, he now has to pay for them, giving her money and funding the printing of more copies and even the making of more content. You go!

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

He sure showed her.

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 3

I used to work in this Barnes & Noble! Store 2862 in Glastonbury, CT. Surprised that this happened there in this relatively quiet town/store

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 15

Tywin lannister?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

According to the guy he doesn't hate Kim, he just doesn't like the "smut" (his words) she puts out for kids to see.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Didn't say how he destroyed them, ahhhhhhmmmm I right?

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

I figured out what you meant way too fast. Now I'm sad.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The pages were sticky????

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

He poured red ink on the pages.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Although I hate the Kardashian celebrity train I do respect the marketing people driving it. They've made a fortune out of literally nothing

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Have to agree. They created an empire off of very little, that has to earn respect.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

this happened in my hometown this guy was drawing with lipstick all over them

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you're the kind of guy who destroys books that sends a message in itself. He should be taken to court

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

People spend an unreasonable time getting mad at the Kardashians.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yeah, Kim has already made the money from it. This just results in lost money for the book store.

9 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 2

Nah, he turned himself in, so he's gonna end up paying for the damage.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

This is their retribution for buying into that sort of shit and still calling themselves a bookstore.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Good. Maybe they'll learn not to buy bullshit books any more.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 7

I'm guessing since new book markups are often pretty high the bookstore probably only pays production costs for the ones that don't sell.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They used to call these playboys and they showed more and had more women in it.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

It's still vandalism. just because it's something you dont agree with, doesnt make it right

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think that's a really hot picture of Kim Kardashian, and I don't have time to put it on a puffin.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Well she does make money off of being desirable, it's normal for you to find her attractive.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I was not aware that such thing like a selfie book exist

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Excuse me, but what is a selfie book?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A collection of selfies, I assume... Never saw one and I hope to keep living without seeing one.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

my god,..

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This man is no hero.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Does she only publish selfie books because most of her fans can't read?

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 7

It's probably a combination of that, and fact that she has very little else to offer the human race.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I sometimes wonder if there's anything interesting or deep going on in her head, despite the apparent lack.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe. I'm more of the opinion that [nothing of value would be lost]: http://imgur.com/fpFN9gO

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Vandalism isn't being a hero. It's being a cunt.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 19

Username... SOOOO relevant

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Can you vandalize trash though?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 7

Any publicity is good publicity

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Imagine having so few problems in your life that this is where you wind up...

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

I know.. a 'selfie book'? Fuck the Kardashians. They're famous because Kim K made a sex tape.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

They're famous because some failed R&B artist betrayed the trust of a young woman and she made the best of her situation.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hahahaaha. She let him film it. She posed for it. She's a dumb whore.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You're obviously a child. Consent to sex with your partner does not give them future consent to distribute (for profit) your sex tape.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'd love to see the reaction if a black guy went into a bookstore and destroyed a bunch of books. This community is the worst.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

You wouldn't be seeing the (literal) dozens of comments calling him a "hero", that's for sure. Destruction of private property during

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

a protest of police brutality? "THEY SHOULD BE IN JAIL!" A man destroys a bunch of books? "WHAT A HERO! LET'S PAY HIS LEGAL BILLS!"

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Thank you, the shit drives me nuts.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You don't destroy books, whatever the reason is. If you're upset with the shit that gets printed, write better ones.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 3

Or to save on postage, just don't buy the book :D

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To be fair, any book is better than a photo book of Kim Kardashian selfies. Yeah, even Twilight.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I would read neither, but I reckon they both exist for a set of reasons, not all obvious.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The photo kind of suggests 'miserable cunt' as well. Doesn't surprise me he'd try to destroy other people's property he doesn't like.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He's not a hero. He committed a crime. It's pretty simple.

9 years ago | Likes 108 Dislikes 23

"Nothing goes over my head..."

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Not to disagree, but the definition of "hero" is subjective. For many, Che Guevara and/or Pablo Escobar were heroes.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 13

He's giving his subjective opinion here.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

He's a hero for destroying books? What? What is happening here, Imgur. Are you guys okay?

9 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 11

Can you imagine how scary that was for the 16-year-old behind the counter? Some crazy old dude just starts destroying stuff?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Mar 9, 2017 7:36 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I see. So you're going to decide what is a legitimate book, and what deserves to be destroyed? Where have I heard that before? Hmmm.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Mar 9, 2017 7:37 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

It's a book. It has a binding and pages. What's inside of it might be repugnant to you, that doesn't change it's legitimacy.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

No seriously tho it may look like a book but it isnt. This is a stupid argument.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

I can understand his hatred, but yeah, destruction of property is a dick move.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Well, I'll challenge you even further. What could possibly make him hate her that much? Why does he care about her that much?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Has he made a statement regarding his hatred for her?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You just said you understand his hatred. Did you forget? lol

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All while calling Trump a Nazi too.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

There's far too many people on this website who are fine with both literal and figurative book burning because they "don't like the content"

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But they call politicians they don't agree with "Hitler." Yet they fail to realize that Hitler got the German people to burn fucking books.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Though I agree burning books is fundamentally wrong.. To be fair, that isn't the worst thing Hitler did.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, it isn't. But it was a step into him ascending to what he became. It's about control and that's what's truly frightening.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Had no idea that destruction of private property made you a good person

9 years ago | Likes 286 Dislikes 39

Get your common sense out of here

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Mar 9, 2017 5:59 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

That would be a rather ridiculous argument to make.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

It's only good when the destruction is of someone the hive mind dislikes or vice versa. It's stupid

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 29, 2017 3:53 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

As a person who can't get a car yet I didn't think of that....

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Even public spaces are paid for by private individuals like you and I.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

its at a store waiting to be sold, thus the private property of the store.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Imagine porn being available next to classic books. Would you be shocked if some angry housewife started ripping up hustler magazines?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

i would say she needs to be arrested or fined if she did it

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Real Gran Torino man. Eastwood is proud.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Destruction of private property

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Stick up your ass

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 15

Apparently it is if the person it happens to is hated for no other reason other than "I don't like her, so nobody else should".

9 years ago | Likes 138 Dislikes 21

DAE not like Beyonce/Kardashians/Kanye/Trump/Obama/Killary/etc

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 14

It's not that we don't like her, it's that selfie books are stupid and that old man did something we would've liked to do

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 22

You would like to destroy private property that isn't yours?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not really. I worded it wrong. People are so hostile

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So if you dislike something, you should go out of your way and destroy them, even if that thing didn't belong to you?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Of course not. People just feel that this sort of thing serves the "selfie book" "justice". I know it may sound a little ridiculous but we

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

We all have flaws. Never said we should. That's why this man is a "hero". Because actually doing such thing is not a polite thing to do

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"I dont like this thing. No one else should"

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Sjw

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 11

Pointless

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's just a stupid human emotion. We all have flaws

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, it's that the thought of a selfie book is stupid. Who the fuck likes the idea of that?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Irrelevant. Don't fuck up shit that isn't yours and isn't hurting you.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

While I get the joke, I can't help but think about how it's the book store eating that cost, not the Kardashians or their publishers.

9 years ago | Likes 1400 Dislikes 10

Book stores send back damaged/unsold stock for a refund from the publisher. I hope the old man is ok, as this sounds like mental illness.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They make royalties on every copy...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They chose to sell them. They're just as responsible.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not that I disagree... but could you kindly direct me to the gofundme for his bail and legal costs?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Or you could just google it

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm sure he forced to pay for damages, worth it if it keeps one child from turning into a narcissistic brat.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Due to the odd way that the US publishing/bookstore industry works it is likely that the publishers would take the loss, not the bookshop.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Any legit book store that carries that garbage deserves to lose the money!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I feel like this is a perfect analogy to "Why we can't have nice things": Sentimental, emotional or rebellious people destroy things --

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

--without realizing that it's a complete 3rd party that pays the consequences/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Seeing as how publishing works mostly on royalties and not like standard products, the publisher actually will be eating that cost.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Having worked in the industry, the publisher and distributor eat the cost. Retailers risk little on books and magazines.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, he turned himself in, so he'll probably end up paying the damages.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

So that means, if we all do, bookstores who sell that shit will stop or go out of business? Count me in.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 15

No, it doesn't mean that. The only real way to control what a business sells is to not give them money for products you don't want.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean, they are still a business. Not their fault people are buying stupid books if that's what allows them to stay in up and running.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Ya cant he just destroy the Kardashians instead? Its not like she wont just make more selfie books.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly! wait...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The store's choice to sell them, no?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Stores don't carry products that consumers don't buy. I'd say fault is on the Kardashians who make it, and the people who purchase the crap.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If it were a library or a private local book store, sure, I would feel the same. But this is Barnes and Noble, they can take the hit.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 18

I agree that it would be WORSE if it were a small independent store. Still, just because they CAN take the hit doesn't mean they deserve to.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If it's only misdemeanor level charges, he can likely get away with fines without jail.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now if we could somehow destroy the master files and the manuscripts, that would be actually worthwhile.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

...I remember a D&D game my party did that for all the Twilight novels in the multiverse... Well, it magically destroyed every copy.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Did you roll a critical, or was it just a simple win?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Critical failure to find a good book in the Infinite Library, which holds one copy of every book in existence, each representing all (1)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

copies of the book. Then they burned that one, and actively searched for all the others. (2?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but it's Barnes and Noble, not your local book store.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

For some people Barnes and Noble is the only one that's stayed open.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because Barnes and Noble put them out of business.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes and no, people don't read as many books, so there aren't as many stores. B&N has much more than just books too.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Regardless, money that goes to covering vandalism is money that's not going to the people who are a part of that business.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also feel bad for people who want a Kardashian selfie book, bc they won't find one. And bc they're people who want a Kardashian selfie book.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ok, then punishing the store for stocking the dog shit.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 14

I'm with dragonflyby, stores don't stock books that consumers don't buy.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nah. Economics dictate what they stock; supply and demand. If they make more $ off of a Kardashian selfie book than something else, that's -

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

-what they're going to stock.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a guy who's worked at a Barnes & noble I can assure you that those damaged books will be sent right back to the publisher for a refund.

9 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 2

Any book store sellings atrocities as this deserve to pay.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I hope they include the selfie books that weren't damaged too

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well, that's about 5% better I guess. Only 5%, though.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To be fair, if they eat that cost they might not make the mistake of restocking it.

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 24

I'd argue that it's not the fault of the store for carrying a product people want; it's the consumer's fault for supporting crap products.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So you think it's fair to go and destroy wares in somebody's business cause you don't want them to carry that ware? Why not just not buy it?

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

Not how "to be fair" works as a qualifier. She's not saying it's fair, she's seeking understanding without letting ethics introduce bias.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

If you buy it, they'll restock it so more people will buy it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So you can destroy it yourself.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Voice of reason right here folks. As much as i can't stand the Kardashians is not up to me to destroy shindig that's not my property.

9 years ago | Likes 269 Dislikes 6

My username is close to being relevant

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Right. Even if it was the Kardashians suffering from this, someone doesn't lose their property rights just because you don't like them.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I enjoyed your use of the word shindig, +1.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Property is theft

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Eat the rich

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You wouldn't download the concept of property rights, would you?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Did your phone autocorrect *shit to *shindig? Or do you regularly use shindig like that?

9 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 0

Shindig. Now there's a word that deserves a return. Along with cattywampus.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Cattywampus totally needs to make a comeback!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I would love to say that i meant to use that word in this instance, but i didnt. In fact i want even going with shit.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

I think the word i was going fir was "something"

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I love me some firs

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Makes sense. *nods coniferously*

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It's a good word. Think I might start using it more often.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

shitdig?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't think my shins should be involved in any digging. They're a bit flabby today.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It is a great word. I usually refer to it as a party. I think the man who destroyed those books was having a ahindig of his own. Llol

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good luck! I've been trying to bring 'hootenanny' back for ages now...

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Yeah, this is always the problem with these "prank" videos even if someone isn't directly hurt. I'm always like "man, now some poor guy (1)

9 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 2

Agreed. Welcome to the land of maturity. Boo. Lol

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

whose job it is to clean up/pay for this mess is going to have a shitty day". Really not cool. (2)

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 0

My friend's parents owned the plumbing shop that the Jackass dude took a shit in. The show did not clean up or compensate them in any way.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Mar 9, 2017 10:46 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Well, I'd tell you to call up A-Ball plumbing in Portland and ask them, but they went out of business a few year ago.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yep, that sounds about right. Same thing goes for all those Vines of people spilling their coffee everywhere or whatever, it's a dick move.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Apr 5, 2017 3:15 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

They ran out the door and never came back.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bunch of cunts.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

People buy books containing nothing but Kim Kardashian selfies? Fuck that's sad.

9 years ago | Likes 878 Dislikes 25

The Kardashian family is still alive in 2017? That's even sadder. http://imgur.com/fpFN9gO

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

I found them in the photography session while looking for real photo essays... sad!

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

People getting their dumb selves arrested as a slight to someone who will never give a shit or likely even hear about it? Fuck that's sad.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We get all manner of vapid books like this in the charity store I work at. These books are worth nothing, they usually get thrown away.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sadder still is there is a Justin Beiber look-a-like, even sadder they have been charged with 900 child sex offences apparently

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

HA losers. I go to my local library for Kim's selfie books

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ugh, modern culture is so gross! People are obsessed with instagram. Can't unplug! That's why i only look at KimK's selfies in book form.

9 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 3

Friend of mine got one as a gag gift for Christmas.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Can we find your friend and downvote him for perpetuating the beast?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

No, I mean she received one, didn't actually go spend money on it.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Ok, find who bought it and downvote ;)

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I work at a barnes and noble and nobody bought any of the ones we had in stock, thank fuck. the crime is they were made in the first place

9 years ago | Likes 275 Dislikes 2

Why did management even think ordering them in was a good idea?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Couldn't tell ya. management makes a lot of dumb decisions. Part of why we're struggling tbh. It's not just cuz amazon cuts into our market

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm really glad to hear that

9 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 1

The sad thing is someone at B&N management bought them and will lose money on them, not a Kardashian. She already got paid.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Serves management right for thinking selfie books would sell in the internet age. They deserved to take a hit for a dumb purchase

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

You're right. It's only hurting the B&N. That being said, I can hardly blame the guy. He probably saw them and his vision just went red

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She does have a nice pair at least

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 23

Why do you think this whole thing happened in the first place?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honey, in my porn, boobs aren't made of plastic.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Just as well she's released this book then, isn't it. I mean, it's not like there are pictures of boobs on the internet.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...of butts.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't like fake tits, or fake ass.

9 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 7

Must be lonely on that pedestal. ????

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 22

I'm going to bet that Kim Kardashian doesn't care what you think

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 9

Or fake people.

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 1

Or fake fakes.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Wouldn't that make them real?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

She started her "stardom" as a porn star. Give it a google.

9 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 9

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Mar 9, 2017 10:20 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

It's been said that she allowed its release so she'd be noticed, in the same way Paris Hilton was.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

its already been revealed that her mom actually orchestrated the filming and release.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

That family really is fucked up... like on some Springer shit.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

If that's true, that is fanfuckintastic. I would love to meet them all some day. If only to punch each one in the face.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

You spelled absofuckinlutely intentional for personal gain. Wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 0

I wish I could upvote this again because I almost fell off my seat with laughter.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

+1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, she made a settlement. Legally it could only be released with her consent, some people's dignity has a price.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I call that intelligence. If it's on the internet, it's on the internet. She just decided to make 5 million instead of nothing.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0