360 no scope

Jan 12, 2015 5:22 AM

slothslothsloth

Views

554989

Likes

14350

Dislikes

166

Pak

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

But can you 360 no scope?

11 years ago | Likes 94 Dislikes 0

I understood all the words in that sentence, but not the sentence itself.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Anything is plausible in internet land

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I like the guy in the background saluting the mission status

11 years ago | Likes 171 Dislikes 0

Think he's scratching his head in disbelief

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

for me, its the guy in the foreground losing his freaking mind

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

You wouldn't actually aim the rifle at earth, you're going to want to aim in the opposite direction of the moon's orbit.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Else it'd just get stuck in earth's orbit. Maybe even catch the moon's gravity later and be flung into interplanetary space.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Orbital mechanics are a bitch, and the kerbals will be remembered for their sacrifice. Even if you aim backward, I think it's too slow.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's the minimum distance away I would want to be from a wasp nest if I were to do something like that.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I Can hear the little boys screaming into their mics.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Mythbusters - we need you

11 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted Jan 12, 2015 6:58 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

OH BABY A TRIPLE!

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I see you Keyori

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We hit a golf ball on the moon. A true 'fuck you' to whoever wasn't on the moon.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not to poop in the punch bowl, but I would think that bullet would burn up on re entry.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

It certainly would. Even if it was ceramic, or aerogel coated or whatever. Bullets cannot do re-entry, its just too fast

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Aerogel coated bullet of course. Did you fall asleep during moon sniping class?

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Why was I not invited to this?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You said you wouldn't and then you did it. You monster.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's the opening of the lander that does this for me.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You'd probably hit Betty White in the leg and she'd come up there and kick you arse.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Someone check and see if this works in KSP!!!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

now planning for a mun base with some sort of missile system, will post when finished

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You better deliver. Screen shots needed too.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm thinking of going with an orbiter instead, landing rocket systems on the mun is pretty tough it seems XD

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As someone who is allergic to the stings/terrified of wasps; you are my hero. <3

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wouldn't the bullet burn up in the atmosphere?

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

being made of solid lead? I'm not sure.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mum get the Hubble!!!

11 years ago | Likes 234 Dislikes 0

HE GETS THE KILL OOOOOOHHHHH

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mom! Mom! Mummy!

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

OOOhhh baby, it's triple.

11 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

WOMBO COMBO

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

WOMBO COMBO

11 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

DAMN SON, where'd you find this?

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

MMMMMMMM watcha say

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Smoke weed everyday

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

GET NO SCOPED! GET NO SCOOOOOOOOOOOPED!

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I'd like to see the -233C frozen steel barrel make a shot without exploding.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Now winnie the pooh can finally stop pretending to be a cloud and get his honey

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wasps don't make honey....

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I read tour username first, your post disappoints me

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wait why did it autocorrect the first your but not the second...

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

PAK

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Mission Status: SICK!

11 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 12

And then he ends up hitting a Sikh instead of the wasp net....

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, that is what the last panel said. Gratz on the literacy. :)

11 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 5

You forgot the rest of the text: PAK! This is it. MY MOMENT. SPLT

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Idk why but this made me so happy

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One small step for man, one giant FUCK YEA FOR MAN FUCKING KIND!!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It couldn't shoot...no oxygen to cause an explosion in the chamber. Any Firefly fan would know this.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Actually, Vera can't fire in the vaccuum of space is because the lube isn't rated for near-cryogenic temperatures and would jam (horribly).

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well then Firefly is wrong. The propellant inside the cartridge contains its own oxidizing agent. You don't need an atmosphere to fire a gun

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Boom. Roasted.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Last dude is all like

11 years ago | Likes 80 Dislikes 1

Now that's a damn fine loop. I mean, DAMN!

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The loop is real

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Don't worry People. I have submitted the question to XKCD. All will be answered!

11 years ago | Likes 880 Dislikes 6

aww man I forgot about xkcd... now i got to go catch up... I HAD THINGS I NEEDED TO DOOOOOOO

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Perfect can't wait to read about it

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I like when XKCD says a link to a video. everyone in comments says that XKCD got them at the video XD

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He does a surprising amount of good publicity.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I will be watching.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Commenting for link when answered.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I wait with baited breath

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I have their book. It's so amazing

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

yup. Funny and informing. What else could you want?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

we need an answer to this...

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You post with delivery, yes?

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I will. ON MY HONOR!!!!!!!!!!

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Totally want to see this answered

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As someone who has had a question answered (https://what-if.xkcd.com/84/ proudest moment of my life) good luck!

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Josh, now I know your general location. MWAHAHAHAHAHA. p.s. thanks for the luck

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Uh oh....now you can come to my hometown and....uh....geek out about Randall Munroe?

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

y34h. I'll nerd snipe yo ass. 360 no-scope.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

So, it has come to this.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Randall can handall it (Get it) I'll just go now.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yup

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Starting reply thread for like update

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Link*

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'll add a comment and Upvote therefore making it a thread!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hope to see it in the next few weeks, that's something i want RM to write about.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

yea, second book!

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Do you have the first one? Even though I've read all the ones online, I loved reading them again and the new ones!

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

yea, my favorite so far was the periodic table collection scenario :D

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My all-time favourite is still the .9c baseball. I do love, though, that the Astatine would maximize the amount of paperwork you have to do.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is Randall Munroe on imgur? He's gotta be, right? Randall, yt?

11 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 0

I sure hope so. Teh hunt begins

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

@Randall pls

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I don't think so, he is a productive person

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Assuming that the rifle is a standard sniper rifle... that bullet took roughly 4 days to reach the earth. Accuracy level - God

11 years ago | Likes 1587 Dislikes 13

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted Aug 22, 2016 6:06 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

We're ignoring that, and that it would never have escaped the moon's gravity. Because it's funnier that way.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You just need more bullets.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's normal Counter-Strike when you live in Australia m8

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

... Let's see... Four milli-dots... that puts us in Africa...

11 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 1

don't forget to adjust for solar windage

11 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

And tell the petit prince to duck. Epic headshot tho.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"sick"

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No wonder launch control was going ape-shit in the pic

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If science can launch a probe that hits its target 10 years later (Rosetta), then they can calculate this shot easily.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He fired from the hip, man. I don't think that was a pre-planned maneuver.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1,440 no scope

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

accuracy level: aimbot

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Why would we assume it's a standard sniper rifle? Also, what the fuck is a standard sniper rifle?

11 years ago | Likes 349 Dislikes 10

Well idk guns but I would assume there is an average rifle. Guess I'm wrong

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Well average and standard aren't the same thing at all.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

True. So there isn't a rifle that comes standard with being a sniper?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well no, there's so many different military branches in so many different countries.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Standart = usual, non-special sniper rifle. Standart issue sniper rifle in X country, etc.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Most probably a. 308 win or 338 lupua

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

May as well take a few extra shots while you wait.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That and the fact that the projectile would (if it's a normal bullet) burn up on entry of earth's atmosphere make this one hell of a shot.

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

My thoughts too, I ignored basically everything to make a rough calculation.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also, by some stroke of luck, it didn't burn up in the atmosphere.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

By some stroke of "we're just going to ignore that part", in my case, at least. Vibranium bullets, shhhhh, quiet your logic.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

if it would take exactly 4 rotations, it would be epic

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

"Exactly" is a word you don't apply to space (:

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

But IF IT DID IT WOULD BE FUCKING EPIC CAUSE THE POSSIBILITY FOR IT TO HAPPEN IS CLOSE TO ZERO

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

AHHHHHHHHH!!!!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ummm.... *cough and shady look to the side* space craft on an asteroid.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes that's all what's wrong with the physics in this story

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Haha, we're ignoring quite a lot. I literally softballed based on shortest path, ignoring all other problems. Retard physics, basically.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What if it was an AWP like my favorite online video game, CounterStrike? How fast would it go then?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In counter-strike, bullets have infinite velocity. It takes as long as your ping. So if you live in Australia, around four days. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Brilliant~!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

WOMBO COMBO

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

WHERE YOU AT

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

GET YO ASS WHOOPED

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A "standard" rifle would not work properly, No Oxygen due to lack of atmosphere.would either require a rail gun or special high O2 bullets

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 13

The propellant inside the cartridge contains its own oxidizing agent. You don't need an atmosphere to fire a rifle.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Firearms do not need external oxygen, they have an oxidant in the gunpowder. The vacuum of space just increases muzzle velocity slightly.

11 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted Feb 12, 2015 10:07 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

guns still goes bang under water though

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

because water is H2O.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 11

The powder/propellant is sealed inside the cartridge with no contact with the ambient atmosphere.

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Yep, one could argue it'd be even more effective in space or on the moon, since there's less gravity and atmosphere to contend with.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

can't be a standard rifle, there's no atmosphere on the moon so it won't work.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Someone already addressed that, rifles don't need air to work... if anything, it would just make the bullet faster.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

how will the gunpowder ignite then?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Cartridges are self-contained, they do not require an outside source of oxygen to ignite. The firing pin just sets off the whole deal.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wouldn't the bullet have to be massive to survive re entry and cause a massive explosion on impact?

11 years ago | Likes 251 Dislikes 11

This guy. Making sense of this. Didn't you see?! The mission was sick. Sickssuful!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're asking too many questions

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Anything bullet sized if traveling fast enough would burn up. If not, it'd impact at terminal velocity, which isn't very high for a bullet.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Terminal velocity for a bullet is 330kph, or 205mph.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And unfortunately bullets averagely hit 1,700 mph. Still 205 mph will do damage but that is a huge loss in speed.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It would depend on the angle of incidence. You're bigger concern is calculating wind affects so that you actually hit the nest. Aka imposib

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, friction from the air would burn up anything smaller than a small car I think

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I would assume the rifle and bullets would be special made for this purpose, using materials designed to withstand such things.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it just needs to go splat!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

nope.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't be a... buzz kill. *shades*

11 years ago | Likes 327 Dislikes 1

A buzz kill debunking the possibility of a buzz kill. Buzzkillception.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

YEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!

11 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

This is magical.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

i am so sad i aam a maan aand cant carry your seed...even if you are a woman

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, I am a man. But that's no reason we shouldn't try! >.>

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yup.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

holy shit

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That is the least of your concern, Aiming at something moving 1000 miles an hour +/- moon velocity.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The moon is moving at the same speed minus the speed at which it's orbiting, so you only have to account for that and rotation. Easy.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Easy."

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Cover an entire country in wasp nests! It's so crazy... it just might work...

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, he would have to compensate for the moons gravity first, then aim where the earth is going to be. But (1/2)

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

the aerodynamics may help the bullet penetrate the atmosphere. But then there are winds to think about. (2/2)

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I honestly think with planning and shit that it is entirely possible to do this.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Good luck creating a bullet that doesn't burn up on reentry into the Earth's atmosphere...

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Too many unpredictable variables with our current understanding of weather

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There would be variables up the anus. I still think it could be done with what we have and know today.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

And then you have to make sure the bullet can even survive reentry into the atmosphere...

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No

11 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

Yes.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 10

No

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

surprisingly no. It has such a low drag coefficient and the copper casing is rather conductive.

11 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 8

Would probably be better to use scandium.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

or astatine. Cuz fuck yo planet!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The casing wouldn't be involved in re entry at all. It would be on the ground near the gunman.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Of the bullet. Sorry for the wordage.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah, I'm pretty sure that doesn't change anything.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

what he says sounds intelligent tho. i think thats more important if u want to be convincing than for ppl to understand what ur even saying?

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yea, tbh, I made that answer, but i emulated the speech pattern of randall munroe. lel. don't tell anybody.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Many upvotes for causing a conductivity, streamlining, aerodynamic pissing war. YEE HAW!!!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'll make a Je Suis Charlie physics question involving thermodynamics, aerodynamics, gravity, number theory, and religion. disgonbegood.gif

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Also, you want low thermal conductivity. Look up the tiles they used on the shuttle.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

That was to keep the astronauts from becoming the same temperature as air in the plasma phase.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

ummm.... not sure what conductivity has to do with it? if anything that'd be worse because the lead inside it would melt and slough out....

11 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

heat conductivity.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

As I mentioned, heat conductivity would be the LAST thing you want. Heat shields on re-entry vehicles are specifically designed NOT to (1/2)

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

(2/2) conduct heat. You want to get rid of it via something like ablation or vapor phase cooling, or avoid it entirely if possible.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I guess you would have to factor in the amount of loss due to re-entry into earth's atmosphere and trust in your sights.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Except the loss in mass would not be predictable enough, and also would likely throw the bullet off course in unpredictable ways

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

With science, anything is possible.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

it just means smaller things get through the air easier.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

He was addressing the word conductive. Conductivity of heat or electricity would be irrelevant to its reentry survivability.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No, that would streamlining or aerodynamics. Conductivity means the ease with which energy (heat or electricty) travels through a material.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What heats reentering objects is the compression of the air in front of it. If it has any cross sectional area, it's going to get hot.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

but cones have the BEST cross section!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The majority of heat from a bullet would come from skin friction because its streamlined.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nope. At reentry the bullet will be traveling next hypersonic speeds, and basically all of the heating is due to the detached shockwave

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Unless bullet was flawlessly balanced it would begin tumbling. Also carbon steel firing pin would shatter in the cold.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

There is no atmosphere so heat takes a long time to transfer away from objects so the firing pin would be fine.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Blackbody radiation with a ~250K differential? Id wager 1kg of steel at 25C would reach -100C within 10 seconds of exiting the lander.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I didn't understand any of that.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

haha well energy flows from high potential to low, the greater the differential the faster it flows

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Emissitivity of steel is 0.28, assuming 297 K, assuming 1 kg of steel is 25 cm^2, you lose 0.309 W/s. I get 0.00068 K/s, which isn't much.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're sure you're doing the calculations right? Are you using 250,000 instead of 250?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

also it would have to escape the moon's gravity and be accurate to compensate for earth and the moon's movement

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

Hey if we can rocket something off earth the size of a recliner chair and have it land where we want it on mars, it's not too far fetched.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The worst part would be compensating for the movement of air in the atmosphere.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That sounds like the easiest part.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I mean, you have to lead the target by a few days, so that makes it a bit more tricky

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

computers

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

With Nasa tier match, I wouldn't say it's impossible. Only issue is that it'd be near impossible to be THAT precise and be an organic human.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well, instead of trying to be so precise, Why don't we just make a really big wasp nest?

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Now you're thinking with portals!

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

because that would be terrifying.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

to make an omelette you have to break a few eggs... One egg we need to break is having incredibly large wasps...

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0