Cruz worse than Trump?

Feb 8, 2016 2:30 PM

AliElkie

Views

59984

Likes

2474

Dislikes

243

Can anyone tell me how correct this is? As a Brit I haven't heard much about Cruz and tbh imgur has mostly just been like "please God not Trump" so I was under the impression Trump was worse

TL;DR: Random Tumblr person think Cruz is more dangerous than Trump, I'd like American Imgur's opinion

Yes Cruz is definitely a scarier option. He will turn America into the western Saudi Arabia. Or try to anyway

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Let's just put it this way, I'd rather have Trump or G.W. for a 3rd and 4th term than to have Cruz in the office. Cruz thinks he's Jesus.

10 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 14

Still better than Hillary. She'd sell us out for a Klondike bar.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

This is actually incredibly accurate. Trump is a smokescreen for Cruz; if you look up Cruz's platform, he's straight out of the 1940s.

10 years ago | Likes 119 Dislikes 32

I just don't understand why Religion should have any place in government.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

(that's because it shouldn't)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You should not come to imgur for political advice. That's like asking a mother of 15 if you should have kids.

10 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 7

He fights for what he believes in and is doing nothing different than what Sanders would be doing if roles were reversed.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

He only believes what his donors want him to believe. That's why he says he's the "Galileo of climate change denial."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What? The guy who just took over the frontrunner status is suddenly so much worse than the prior one everyone hated? Shocking!

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

many people just formed their opinion 30 seconds ago by reading the post.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I would rather have an asshole who makes bad social policies than an asshole who destroys the economy.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Trump doesnt scare me as I dont think he actually believes half of what he says, its just pandering. Im prepared to call his bluffs

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

imagine if trump gets elected and has to hold a diplomacy meeting. WW3 for sure.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He almost had up until the tinfoil hat slipped on the last bulletpoint. No all I see is bullshit.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You won't get any serious intellectual discussion within the character limit

10 years ago | Likes 137 Dislikes 3

This is starting to become an imgur copypasta comment.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

+1 for the most intelligent thing I have seen today.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You won't get much worthwhile out of a social media site in regards to politics.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Oh I don't know about that one. There are smart informed objective people on the internet if you choose to look for them.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not a damn one of the Republican field is worth any serious consideration. I'm not gonna pretend Sanders is perfect, but everyone else in

10 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 26

this election either terrifies me or disgusts me. I have to live in this country for at least a few more years.

10 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 10

Kasich and rand Paul are/were fine candidates. You may not agree with them, but they also aren't batshit crazy assholes like the rest ofthem

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Kasich has done well as Governor of Ohio. Surpluses and what not...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm so sad Rand dropped out.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I would love to live in your country despite the political madhouse. Apart from the aforementioned madhouse it's a beautiful place 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2/2 that being said, want to switch places?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But...he's not a master mind at all. He's just a nut job that won't hear any kind of alternate plans other than his own and won't budge. (1/

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 14

This doesn't make him a master mind, it makes him ballsy sure, but not a master mind. Only a true idiot will never, ever listen to (2/?)

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

a differing point of view. And that's what we have with Cruz. He doesn't plan long term, his plans were made 2000 years ago in a book (3/?)

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

that most people have heard about. He's not intelligent, not a master mind, not playing the long game. He's just crazy. (4/4)

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

Cruz is dangerous. Trump is a joke.

10 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 25

Just reading this as a Cruz supporter... sounds great to me!

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 11

Keep in mind they aren't our only options.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Gary Johnson 2016

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

There you go.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

granted I will say I like Austin Petersen more, I still think Johnson has the bigger rep.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As scary as this seems, if you've read about Cruz's relationships in Congress, you'll know that almost everyone dislikes him as a person.1/2

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Even with a Republican majority in the House and Senate, he wouldn't get much done because he's supposedly a huge jerk.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

So...you support the FUNDAMENTAL TRANSFORMATION of the U.S.?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cruz is definitely worse than Trump

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 15

I think they're dramatizing the president's power quite a bit. While I believe checks and balances have been weakened, they do still exist.

10 years ago | Likes 127 Dislikes 10

This comment didn’t age well...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck me, it really, REALLY didn't...

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, but the House and Senate are under Republican majority control. So if Cruz is elected, they can pass anything.

10 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 8

Filibuster. Need 60 votes in the Senate.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But will they be after the election? House/senate elections run at the same time as presidential, right?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Some do. One third of each is up for election at one time. So we could see a shift but it is unlikely.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

One third of the Senate, but the entire House is voted for every two years.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Word. Thanks for the correction.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Religion and policy should never mix. That's how you get isis

10 years ago | Likes 765 Dislikes 44

And you know, universities and hospitals. The world is more complicated than that.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Policy" must always be tempered by morality, though. Just because a government CAN grant itself power, does not mean it should.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What do you even know about Isis?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Problem is they don't separate well either. If you have power, and believe in something, you will fight for it. Religious or not.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So Isis is the new fodder for the ol' reductio ad Hitlerum. Cool.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Isis is a product of us military involvement in the middle east

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

It's more complicated then that, but you're partially right

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

if there's only one reason then that's it but I ain't making 6 comments about that ish

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

One of the things I hate about elections. I feel some people put their votes based mostly on religion than on policy.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You forgot to and "in counties with low education amongst the general population"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But religion isn't just something where you go sit in a pew for an hour a week and that's it. It's meaningful and impacts everything 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 8

The intelligence of the constitution foolheartedly thought there would be people who could set down their religious beliefs while making law

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

From your diet, to clothes, to your work schedule. To insist policy and religion have a wall between them is not feasible so the best 2/3

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 8

Course is to understand, accommodate, compromise, and collaborate. Trying to keep it out altogether will just make people stubborn.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 8

You get isis from cia funding it for controlling the troubled region. In return, they get to profit from oil money.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

You wearing a tin foil hat there, bud?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

the CIA's been causing mayhem in Africa/Asia/South America as long as they have existed and its all documented.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's... A yes... Then...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Are you this stupid? The CIA doesnt even deny their role why are you? What the hell lol.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Bill of Rights is based on the belief of a Creator. That man's rights come from the Creator, and NOT the government. There is no 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 21

Official religion, (and there shouldn't be). But to state the FF didn't let religion influence their work is inaccurate.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 17

BTW: this post had confirmed my support for Cruz. I haven't read anything about TC outlawing IUD/BC... What's da sauce on that claim?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 14

One part of the constitution that people who are always yelling about the constitution forget about. Ugh

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Constitution and the Bible = cherry pick the parts you like, forget about the parts you don't

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's never happened in the USA before * sweats nervously*

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A Christian influence in politics may have been fine back when we wrote the constitution, but we're too diverse now to keep that ideology.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I agree with your sentiment, but the founding fathers were very clear they wanted no religion in government, so the first part of your(1)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

statement is incorrect. (2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You are correct. I'm sorry if I spouted misinformation, that was not my intention.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I belong to a Baptist church (in Canada). I cannot understand how any politician could allow their religion to influence their politics when

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

their country is made up of so many different people. You could argue that to be a good person of faith you must use it to back up your

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

politics but I feel like once you enter that field your priorities should change. Faith is great, but too often it's used as an excuse to be

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

shitty to other people and pursue your own fucked agenda that caters to only a small group of people.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or Saudi Arabia

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Truth is he likely isn't very religious at all. Just another group he can use to get power.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

He legit tweeted that he was "a Christian first and American second." That's not someone who's going to do what he thinks is best for the >

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

nation, that's someone who will lord his beliefs over them and let them dominate his choices and actions.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sounds like something the evangelical right would like him to say.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The founding fathers understood this. Sadly, we've just lost our way.

10 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 6

If any modern candidate talked about religion the way the founding fathers did, people would March in the streets.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

If any modern candidate acted at all like the founders, people would march in the streets.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Expecially considering the founding fathers were religious, secessionist, racist slave owners.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I'm pretty sure like half of them were agnostic.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's how you get the dark ages and the crusades too.

10 years ago | Likes 169 Dislikes 11

We never learn. It's why we will always strive for a utopia but never accomplish it.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The dark ages weren't dark because of religion.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

Didn't many nations prevent the spreading of "pagan" knowledge from Greece/Rome in the name of Christianity?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't know about anything like that, but: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Ages_%28historiography%29

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The crusades were retaliatory wars against the Ottomans. Stop pretending they were some terrible atrocity committed by the church.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 13

Mmm, yes. The massacre of Jerusalem. So retaliatory.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

The Persian Wars...The Great Crusades...The Battle on Hoth...

10 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 0

don't forget the First Order

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hoth man, so many good people lost there.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Government and the church powers should never mix

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

As a Republican, two words: Marco Rubio

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

As a time traveler, two words from Imgur's future posts when Rubio does win: "even worse".

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Serious question: What'd you think of his 'glitched' comment (repeated 4 times) during the last debate and Christie's pouncing on it?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My own thought is that it's more the short-attention span media pouncing on a non-issue. They'll find something else to chew on soon enough.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(Mostly I'm curious if you think it's damaged his chances in the primary, or affected your support or that of others who share it.)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most of this is MSNBC garbage but I do agree that Cruz is more conservative than trump

10 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 23

Which parts are actually untrue? Or do you just not like anything that could be seen as having a liberal tint even if its 100% true.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 22

He never said he wanted to ban birth control, he just thinks taxpayers shouldn't be forced to buy it for other people

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 5

Which is not what is happening. Insurance companies are paying for it bc it's cheaper for them than pregnancies.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Him and others like him want to ban PP outright which they have been doing. PP's abortion related activities make up a tiny fraction.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Semantics, really. End result is still disastrous

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

Oh no, now people will need to either not have sex or learn how to budget for entertainment.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Oh no, it's almost like public health is more important than some puritanical hangup on sex!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

No, it's not semantics. Not paying for it out of taxes and banning it are not the same thing, no matter how much people say they are.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which is actually quite a valid point.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

Not really because if they cant afford an abortion and have the child how can they afford to raise it? It costs more so its irrational.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

They just don't have sex? Is it so weird that I feel balancing of entertainment and finances pretty simple?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

Bullets 1, 4, &6 are explicitly untrue. 2 I'm unsure of. The paragraphs are mostly conjecture and fear mongering. Example:last sentence (1/2

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 11

Take all of Cruz's history as a senator 6 is the most logical conclusion. No reason to believe hed become less radical in office...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Are you seriously saying that Ted Cruz isn't an evangelical conservative, or that he would nominate a liberal/moderate SC justice?

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

I disagree with the latter part of the 1st bullet and I disagree that Cruz will disconsider a sc nominee if they "have a hint of moderate"

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

Bullet one is unequivocally true as shown by polling his main support comes from the most religious of the right. He is evangelical...

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

(2/2) Oh no how dare a freshman senator do something within his power, ahh the huge manatee :''(

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 12

It's not that it's a bad thing that he had impact as a freshman senator - that's a good thing. It shows how good he is at politics.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its not how dare but rather a compliment on how he COULD. A freshman senator causing any significant change shows they are skilled.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Yes but the source implied that this was a bad thing and therefore it would be even worse to elect them to the executive

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 9

You're completely not understanding his point...

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

He did something extremely childish that was a BAD thing to do. Just because you can doesnt mean you should....

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And that's scary because Cruz has in the past taken strong stances such as the government shutdown. So if he's Pres, what will he be capable

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

of. He might actually be able to shut down Planned Parenthood. What if he changes gay marriage to a state rights and takes that away? Scary

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I seriously doubt the dude wants to ban contraceptives.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

You'd be surprised.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

No, I actually wouldn't. You might though.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Dude, I've MET nutjobs who'd want that sort of thing.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

So, because you've met people who want to ban contraceptives, this means that Ted Cruz wants to do so as well? Think about that for a sec.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I could be wrong in my assessment, yes. He's done worrying things related to such in the past though.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Cruz wants to ban IUDs? Although I highly doubt this is true, I'd love for him to try and take mine away.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 8

Then we can cut off his hand when he attempts to grab it, yes? :P

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

With his knowledge of the reproductive system, I'm not sure he'd even be able to find it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hah! Fine, when he attempts to *find* it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It might have been that he was trying to repeal Obama care which includes full coverage of IUDs, but that is very different from banning it

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

He thinks IUDS are equal to abortion so yes.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

This.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Whats an IUD?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

an IUD is a form of birth control. A device that's placed in the uterus preventing the way sperm fertilize the egg. 3 different types. ECT.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Improvised Uterary Device

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's a little magical invention that kills off any sperm trying to invade your uterus. https://youtu.be/rx5py_yjNJY

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Birth control! It's a tiny t-bar with hormones placed in your uterus and is 99.6% effective for 5 years. Incredibly safe + few side effects.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But when the side effects happen, oh boy does it suck.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He has never said that explicitly- it comes from a "personhood affirmation" he signed which could technically cause IUDs to be seen as as a

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Form of abortion due based on judicial interpretation of "fertilization".

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Cruz should educate himself on how IUDs work.. They prevent fertilization. How do you misinterpret that as abortion?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's technically not Cruz's interpretation that would matter, it's up to a judge to decide what "fertilization means", but it could be

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Interpreted 4 ways: penetration of egg by sperm/ successful combination of genetic info from sperm and egg/ activation of genetic info/

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Implantation of embryo in uterus. All these different things are prevented by different contraceptives in different ways.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cruz believes in the constitution and has the disposition of our founders. If you find that threatening, then he's not your guy.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 11

This the most succinct and accurate response to the original post within the 140 character limit.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 9

They acknowledge allowed corporations to grow too large would destroy the democratic system as they would naturally move to bribe lawmakers.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You know how disgusted they would be with somebody whos being bribed by corporations?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Thomas Jefferson: Because religious belief, OR NON-BELIEF, is such an important part of every person’s life, 1/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

freedom of religion affects every individual. State churches that use government power to support themselves and force their views on 2/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

persons of other faiths undermine all our civil rights. Ted Cruz, meanwhile, says atheists shouldn't be allowed to run for president. 3/3

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sam Adams: In regard to religion, mutual toleration in the different professions thereof is what all good and candid minds 1/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

in all ages have ever practiced, and both by precept and example inculcated on mankind.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Feb 9, 2016 5:30 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

They only allowed corporations to exist for a certain amount of years, only in one specific industry, taxed the shit out of them......

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thomas Jefferson: In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot[...]

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

His *interpretation of the Constitution. Which is probably pretty far cry from what the "founders" would want now.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

[I hope that gov't authorities] will never be pretended that any persons employed in [gov't] had interviews with the gods - John Adams 1/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ted Cruz pretends to talk with "God" every day.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The founding fathers were absolutely 100% unequivocally against the free reign "free market" corporatism that America has become.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

How about that part in it that says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion"?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Meaning that there shall be no official state religion. Written in to prevent another Church of England.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, but Ted Cruz is in the camp that wants a Christian theocracy.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I subscribe to the "He's Creepy As Fuck All" school of thought, but I don't know enough to label him a real-life Adam Sutler quite yet.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He says only Presidents who start their day "on their knees" are suitable for office. He doesn't want atheists to be allowed in. 1/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As A Canadian they all scare the hell out of me!

10 years ago | Likes 117 Dislikes 24

As a US resident, I agree completely.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I second this thought too. They're literally trying to choose a less evil person.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Take him back you bastards!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bieber, Dion, Cruz, they are yours now. Good luck with that.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well they can't all be Trudeaus....

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Fuddle Duddle !

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

OYY!!! Fuck you buddy!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ha ha that's what the older Trudeau said all the time...once he was caught saying the f word

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I read up on fuddle duddle....I thought you were telling me to fuck off!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a European: At least you can be sure that the crazies and the fanatics will be the ones staying at home, not seeking refuge.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

As an American, I'm with you. Someday I hope there will be an election with a candidate I actually want to vote for...

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

How about Sanders? :)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

IMHO he's not as bad as most of the rest, but I disagree with his economic policy. Will likely still vote for him, but not thrilled about it

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an American - got any room up there for me and my dog?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Sure bud :) you just gotta pass our skating and moose riding tests... Sorry

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Always room for pets...you may have to pass a couple drinking tests thought...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am half Irish and half Italian. That's a test I know I can pass.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a Canadian, Cruz is ALL YOUR FAULT

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

"Ted Cruz pulls off his mask and--SURPRISE--He was Stephen Harper, ALL ALONG!"

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

I'd be OK with that, but Harper was a fiscal PM, not an ideological one.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As another Canadian, if Trump gets in and tanks the US economy by applying his 'business savvy' at least our dollar will rise again. :)

10 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 5

It'll actually tank us worse and force us into even closer relations with China, India, and Russia, and away from traditional allies.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As another other Canadian, I am still terrified.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

User name checks out

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Put on our snowshoes, hike to Timmies, grab a double-double and wait for this all to blow over?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

And enjoy your waterproof bills. Hot damn that's such a good idea. Waterproof money, jaysus.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Canadian bills are waterproof because theyre plastic. Plastic doesn't burn it melts. How will you smoke cigars with burning 100's?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a fellow Canadian, funckin' right bud!

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I realize this will die a horrible death here, but Uncle Bernie scares me as much as a Cruz or Trump presidency.

10 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 25

Why because hes literally the only one not owned by corporations and wants to make the country an actual democracy again?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Youre only scared of him because of how much corporate propaganda youve eaten up in your life.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Don't worry, even if he wins, republicans will still block almost everything he wants to do

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 3

Couldn't the same be said for Trump but on the other side of the aisle?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As the Senate and House are currently leaning republican, a republican president has a higher chance of passing through policies and 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A republican president would be less likely to veto conservative policies passed through the houses 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thats a good point. As long as it didnt involve war, expand debt, or try to take away freedoms I'd be okay with that. Same goes for the left

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is true for any president, tho. One side will always be pulling the other side down and everything will be 100x harder than necessary.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But yes, especially for Bernie.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Nope the GOP is eventually gunna have to let go of the southern strategy as the country gets more liberal.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Even if Bernie doesnt win this election hes going to get close enough that somebody like him will win the next one.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

He may damage our economics, but he will always fight for our basic rights and freedoms. Cruz seems to be much more oppressive.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Irrelevant anyway. We live in an oligarchy. Only people maintaining the status quo were concerned about the economics of ending slavery.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You really need to research how many top level economists completely agree with Bernie Sanders. Dont listen to right wing rhetoric.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

It's not right wing rhetoric to say that enacting the highest capital gains tax in the developed world is going to have adverse effects.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah its right wing rhetoric to ignore all the benefits of his proposed legislation which would have positive effects on the economy.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'm actually for the guy. Simply stating he may make changes that would make some unhappy, but he will not take rights away from people.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah hes going to make corporations extremely unhappy which is what the vast majority of Americans want contrary to major news media.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

He is in agreement with members of the "Keynesian" branch of economics, which many would argue is not real, fundamental economics

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Many would argue any number of things you can dismiss what you want I can control you. This isnt Capitalism anyways its Corporatism.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Right, also known as cronyism or crony capitalism. But some people say that the reason this is the case is because the power of gov't can

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wouldn't call Cruz brilliant, but he does know who butters his bread and he will always ensure his bread is buttered, so to speak.

10 years ago | Likes 470 Dislikes 16

Is your muffin buttered? Would you like us to assign someone to butter your muffin?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The first thing he ever said to his wife was "I like butter"!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Lol this sounds like a President Underwood quote.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"I'm gonna butter your biscuit"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a very intelligent man, Cruz seems very intelligent, like Sanders.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So he rules the butter and bread industry. Im confused

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He plays the Washington politics game very, very well. He's also in bed with Goldman Sachs, literally.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As someone who likes buttered bread, this is very appealing to me.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a lawyer, Ted Cruz's legal career was astoundingly prestigious. You can't tell from the crazy he spouts now, but he had v high level jobs

10 years ago | Likes 83 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Dec 1, 2025 5:13 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

He was #1 in his class at Harvard. Simpleton is not the word to describe Cruz.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Dec 1, 2025 5:13 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

not a jab at you iamhorrible but it frightens me how many ppl get their views from CC, social media etc. Shit even "real" news isn't news.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well he definitely isn't stupid. He's got a Harvard Law degree so that's gotta show that he's got some brains.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just because you don't agree with his opinions doesn't mean he's not extremely intelligent

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Guy was top of his class at Harvard. Hell yeah he's brilliant.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

This.Do not underestimate Cruz like the GOP did thinking they could energize the base while controlling him. Turd sandwich Giant douche 2016

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

On that note... time for toast

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Click*

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Actually, Cruz is extremely brilliant. He is quite possibly the smartest candidate, and that's what makes him so frightening.

10 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 2

he problem with Cruz is that he's recently made many enemies. I'd consider it not that smart when you run for POTUS.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

yea but I have to wonder how much of that was part of the plan, he's running on the whole anti-establishment platform

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Almost all the front-runners have this anti-establishment idea.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Let me clarify: his IQ is estimated to be 145. Surely impressive, but in a nation of 320M people at least 800,000 people are just as smart.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But being smarter than 99.75% of the population is damn good

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dude went to Princeton then Harvard law, that stuff doesn't happen on accident also was a champion debater

10 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 1

They all have impressive educational backgrounds hes not unique.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

I'd argue that only Carson and Fiorina have education backgrounds that are as or even more impressive.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But sure, it's not like the other candidates didn't go to respectable institutions of higher learning

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Isnt it funny how the most impressive ones are the biggest idiots. Just goes to show how money can make these fuckers dance.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Cruz is far more dangerous than Trump, absolutely.

10 years ago | Likes 445 Dislikes 50

all of the candidates this election are very very dangerous. Bernie is just the least

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Trump is loud and obnoxious crazy. Cruz is evil and diabolical crazy.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

If Carson drops out, hes going to be very hard to contain. Rubio or Bush to win, while not great, are pretty much the only two non crazies.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I think that difference is: Trump will accidentally launch nukes, while Cruz will watch you straight in your fucking eyes as he do it.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

He is convinced that he has to act a certain way because God told him to. This makes him inflexible on anything and very dangerous.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

He is using "god told him" to unite ultra-religious people. Cruz has no understanding of god, only that saying "god" will control people.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If Carson drops out, hes going to be very hard to contain. Rubio or Bush to win, while not great, are pretty much the only two non crazies.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I don't believe that Bush will be able to win but he definitely can influence the election. He has a huge war chest and can do damage.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Kasich is pretty reasonable

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

rubio's debate performance the other night was pretty unnerving. he didn't seem sane or in control.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

He does have the party on his side, which might control him. But at any rate its still crazytown

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And both are irrelevant. Been saying for months Rubio will win the Republican ticket. If they run him with Kasich, they win. OH and FL.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Ohioan here, don't be to sure about that. Many here aren't pleased with Kasich.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Trump will probably not accomplish anything...Cruz will repeal Obamacare, planned parenthood funding, try to destroy gay marriage...

10 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 7

Goodbye Obamacare

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

But the greatest concern, in my opinion, is that Trump can't win a general...Cruz can.

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 6

Polls show Sanders beating Cruz but Cruz beating Hilary yet people still claim Hilary is more electable

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Hillary IS far more electable. The current polls down consider the socialist fear mongering that the republican campaign will be.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

Undecideds have formed an opinion on Clinton over 20 years...they are just learning about Sanders, and R will shape the narrative.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

People definitely know about Sanders the socialist and he's improved in his standings as his views have become more well-known

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0