wunjee

24 pts ยท November 12, 2013


But please, do tell me how Tulsa and Rosewood effect you personally now 100 years later. Go on. I'm sure you are just devastated.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Lucy is best mom.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Africa? Asia? The Arab world? India? Not so much. Hell even in South America the least tolerant nation was "Socialist" Venezuela. Amazing.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The funny part is that most of Western Europe and the "anglicized" world are overwhelmingly tolerant of other races.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Racism and segregation are most common in India, Africa, the Arab world, China, SEA and the Pacific islands.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I will give you that I may have mixed up murders and violent crime as a whole but seeing that murder is the ultimate form of violent crime..

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I guess that "old white supremacist talking point" is still reflected in the most current FBI statistics.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

53.34%. Well shit...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They are responsible for 54% of murders. But I admit, those may have been old statistics. Let's look at 2018.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nuance is a thing.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Homicide is not always a crime. Murder is always a crime.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also keep in mind that there's a difference between homicide and murder.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's the ultimate violent crime.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Blacks were responsible for 37.37% of all violent crime in 2018. Yes, that's not 54%. It's still an overrepresentation of almost THREE TIMES

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'll play your game. Let's roll with ALL violent crimes in 2018.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But if you want to break it down further, let's do it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Homicide is a violent crime, is it not?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

FBI: UCR? "Uniform Crime Reporting"?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I did say that. And that's what the statistic supports. You cannot simply invalidate the statistic because of the unknowns.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When the race of the offender was known...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

begin with is because it's important to know. And what we know is exactly what the statistic leads off with.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's you trying to redefine something to fit your world view and that's not how the world works. The reason that statistic is recorded to

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My point stands because it is an official FBI government statistic... My point does not require your validation. It's recorded in history.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

blacks committed 54% of those crimes and whites committed 43%.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My point stands. You have not done anything to disprove my point except add an irrelevant number to it. When the race of the perp was known

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The methodology of the statistic's data is literally right there in front of you but you are chosing to ignore it and moving the goal posts.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because the race of the perp was unknown. The statistic is based on the known race of the perp. Lol. This is not difficult to understand..

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0