2680 pts · July 26, 2012
Programmer, Reader, Observer
It sounds like you might like KeePass if you haven't tried it. Offline database encrypted by master key with notes for an entry
Seconded, hell if the yearly increase is less than inflation I counter or look for a new job
Varies pretty heavily, anything from 1.5k to 5k on the lower end. The upper end is mansions and absurdity.
Yeah, definitely possible in a medium to high cost of living area in southern California. Budget is definitely still terribly off though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nr_3MvtSgDE
Seems like an original according to the description here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nr_3MvtSgDE
5th paragraph, "Judge Mark McGinnis granted ThedaCare's request [for the injunction]" paragraphs 6 & 7 provide more context
I responded to myself on comments 4, 8, and 9 to keep comments about specific sources tied together. I realize now that might be bad. Sorry!
Thus why I'm saying source 5, etc.
Appreciate the lack of a dickish response! What link can't you access? The sources in the article you posted are listed numerically-
So yes, I'm questioning the validity of your source. I ask again, is the author having an open-minded, intellectually honest discussion? fin
There's other issues, like the inline citation to "The souls of white folk" published on the same site, but I think I've proven my point 10/
Where are they being taught this? By whom? 9e/
The rest of this paragraph is speculative. "Children are being taught that they live in a society that is riddled with racism and hate." 9d/
"... provide both clear norms for criticism and achievable practical goals for social transformation" 9c/
"[a critical theory] must explain what is wrong with current social reality, identify the actors to change it, and ... 9b/
"racism cannot ever truly be solved, according to CRT" really? Says who? In fact, source 4 would explicitly disagree with this! 9a/
There's also the completely uncited paragraph 3 under Critical Race Theory > What is it. Which makes important claims about CRT. 9/
Was Du Bois wrong in this belief? Why? That's left for the reader to fill in with their own world view. 8c/
the argument put forth that Du Bois would indeed see people as oppressors or oppressed, but the author does nothing with this conclusion 8b/
Looking at the historical context of the years active, and the related rise of nazism, fascism, at the very least does support 8a/
9: Simple fact citation used for tracing Du Bois work. The years in which Du Bois wrote have little to do with the efficacy of CRT. 8/
8: Technically not a complete source, probably same as 7. Why do that? I'll chalk it up to a mistake and not trying to bloat citations 7/
Sadly, I don't have access to source 5, 6, and 7, and as such I can't evaluate for whether they're intellectually honest or not. 6/
The entire second half of this article ties (decently, so I'm not coming off as a total asshole!) CRT/CT with Marxism and nazi-ism 5/
"interdisciplinary empirical social research" That's not "rhetoric only" to me- especially with the focus on sociology from the source. 4b/
"In other words, “critical” arguments are formed and founded in rhetoric—only" - but the source in the same paragraph emphasizes: 4a/
It sounds like you might like KeePass if you haven't tried it. Offline database encrypted by master key with notes for an entry
Seconded, hell if the yearly increase is less than inflation I counter or look for a new job
Varies pretty heavily, anything from 1.5k to 5k on the lower end. The upper end is mansions and absurdity.
Yeah, definitely possible in a medium to high cost of living area in southern California. Budget is definitely still terribly off though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nr_3MvtSgDE
Seems like an original according to the description here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nr_3MvtSgDE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nr_3MvtSgDE
5th paragraph, "Judge Mark McGinnis granted ThedaCare's request [for the injunction]" paragraphs 6 & 7 provide more context
I responded to myself on comments 4, 8, and 9 to keep comments about specific sources tied together. I realize now that might be bad. Sorry!
Thus why I'm saying source 5, etc.
Appreciate the lack of a dickish response! What link can't you access? The sources in the article you posted are listed numerically-
So yes, I'm questioning the validity of your source. I ask again, is the author having an open-minded, intellectually honest discussion? fin
There's other issues, like the inline citation to "The souls of white folk" published on the same site, but I think I've proven my point 10/
Where are they being taught this? By whom? 9e/
The rest of this paragraph is speculative. "Children are being taught that they live in a society that is riddled with racism and hate." 9d/
"... provide both clear norms for criticism and achievable practical goals for social transformation" 9c/
"[a critical theory] must explain what is wrong with current social reality, identify the actors to change it, and ... 9b/
"racism cannot ever truly be solved, according to CRT" really? Says who? In fact, source 4 would explicitly disagree with this! 9a/
There's also the completely uncited paragraph 3 under Critical Race Theory > What is it. Which makes important claims about CRT. 9/
Was Du Bois wrong in this belief? Why? That's left for the reader to fill in with their own world view. 8c/
the argument put forth that Du Bois would indeed see people as oppressors or oppressed, but the author does nothing with this conclusion 8b/
Looking at the historical context of the years active, and the related rise of nazism, fascism, at the very least does support 8a/
9: Simple fact citation used for tracing Du Bois work. The years in which Du Bois wrote have little to do with the efficacy of CRT. 8/
8: Technically not a complete source, probably same as 7. Why do that? I'll chalk it up to a mistake and not trying to bloat citations 7/
Sadly, I don't have access to source 5, 6, and 7, and as such I can't evaluate for whether they're intellectually honest or not. 6/
The entire second half of this article ties (decently, so I'm not coming off as a total asshole!) CRT/CT with Marxism and nazi-ism 5/
"interdisciplinary empirical social research" That's not "rhetoric only" to me- especially with the focus on sociology from the source. 4b/
"In other words, “critical” arguments are formed and founded in rhetoric—only" - but the source in the same paragraph emphasizes: 4a/