6368 pts ยท July 21, 2014
Floridian here, can confirm. I saw this while on a jetski and continued jetskiing.
If you're so concerned about Spiderman's sexuality maybe learn to draw and make your own comics. Or buy the real ones 2/2.
Have you considered that the artist is making fan comics for free in their free time and can portray characters however they want? 1/2
use long enough to ensure that babies aren't growing up funky. 2/2
Biologist here: I'd be very hesitant before using any supplements. Not saying they're definitely bad but make sure that they've been in 1/2
Really? I've always thought of it as a relatively common word. But then again, I'm gay sooo... *scuttles off over the rainbow*
*making the world 75% Russian tundra
OP will probably never see this so far down, but I thought your "before" pics were crazy hot.
Maybe the sticker is just trying to support people who have butt-cancer fetishes?
2) woman A is going to heaven and B is going to hell. I'm not trying to say that all prostitutes go to hell (I'm not even christian).
1) It doesn't. But given the assumption that the woman in the comic did and the hooker didn't, then there are lots of people who'd say that
provided she didn't go to church and all
According to the preachers outside my dorm, you have to accept jesus as your lord first, so in their world view the hooker went to hell.
I know he hates being called lucky but I'm sure he gets lucky plenty, if you catch my drift ;)
I know we went back and forth on that other story, but I just got around to reading this, and these ones are really fucked up.
3 which IMO is a very pertinent distinction to make on his thread.
2 to "yeah the system is set up to take advantage of poor people but legally he does have responsibility for a kid he claimed as his"
Because the court documents aren't released. If he actually did sign something then the case goes from "outraged MRA actually have a point"
Where do you live?
3 poor, uneducated black man rather than a larger men's rights issue. That isn't to say that paternity laws are all fine and dandy though.
2 then he's legally responsible for that kid, including child care. This is, as I said earlier, a case of the state taking advantage of a
(By which I meant don't believe everything you read from one source). If he, in ignorance, decided to "help his ex out" by signing a form
also, I'm going to shoot your advice right back at you http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/notthefather.asp
6 I think this is the exception more than the rule but the gov is basically committing highway robbery for anyone it can stick it to.
5 anyone who is easily accessible should be able to get a paternity test taken care of within 3 years. This is still pretty fucked up though
4 like these will become a lot less common. Also, this reads to me more of the government taking advantage of poor black incarcerated people
3 there's some legitimate stuff here, but I think that with paternity testing a lot cheaper and easier today than it was in the 80s, cases
2 sure how much I believe his ignorance of the suit. The government is pretty good at finding you if you owe child support. That being said
1 This is super awful but there's a few reasons that I'm not pulling out the pitchforks yet. a: He was named the father in '87. b: I'm not
3) single custody, if there's a legitimate need (like, she's not on the forms) then there's a case.
Floridian here, can confirm. I saw this while on a jetski and continued jetskiing.
If you're so concerned about Spiderman's sexuality maybe learn to draw and make your own comics. Or buy the real ones 2/2.
Have you considered that the artist is making fan comics for free in their free time and can portray characters however they want? 1/2
use long enough to ensure that babies aren't growing up funky. 2/2
Biologist here: I'd be very hesitant before using any supplements. Not saying they're definitely bad but make sure that they've been in 1/2
Really? I've always thought of it as a relatively common word. But then again, I'm gay sooo... *scuttles off over the rainbow*
*making the world 75% Russian tundra
OP will probably never see this so far down, but I thought your "before" pics were crazy hot.
Maybe the sticker is just trying to support people who have butt-cancer fetishes?
2) woman A is going to heaven and B is going to hell. I'm not trying to say that all prostitutes go to hell (I'm not even christian).
1) It doesn't. But given the assumption that the woman in the comic did and the hooker didn't, then there are lots of people who'd say that
provided she didn't go to church and all
According to the preachers outside my dorm, you have to accept jesus as your lord first, so in their world view the hooker went to hell.
I know he hates being called lucky but I'm sure he gets lucky plenty, if you catch my drift ;)
I know we went back and forth on that other story, but I just got around to reading this, and these ones are really fucked up.
3 which IMO is a very pertinent distinction to make on his thread.
2 to "yeah the system is set up to take advantage of poor people but legally he does have responsibility for a kid he claimed as his"
Because the court documents aren't released. If he actually did sign something then the case goes from "outraged MRA actually have a point"
Where do you live?
3 poor, uneducated black man rather than a larger men's rights issue. That isn't to say that paternity laws are all fine and dandy though.
2 then he's legally responsible for that kid, including child care. This is, as I said earlier, a case of the state taking advantage of a
(By which I meant don't believe everything you read from one source). If he, in ignorance, decided to "help his ex out" by signing a form
also, I'm going to shoot your advice right back at you http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/notthefather.asp
6 I think this is the exception more than the rule but the gov is basically committing highway robbery for anyone it can stick it to.
5 anyone who is easily accessible should be able to get a paternity test taken care of within 3 years. This is still pretty fucked up though
4 like these will become a lot less common. Also, this reads to me more of the government taking advantage of poor black incarcerated people
3 there's some legitimate stuff here, but I think that with paternity testing a lot cheaper and easier today than it was in the 80s, cases
2 sure how much I believe his ignorance of the suit. The government is pretty good at finding you if you owe child support. That being said
1 This is super awful but there's a few reasons that I'm not pulling out the pitchforks yet. a: He was named the father in '87. b: I'm not
3) single custody, if there's a legitimate need (like, she's not on the forms) then there's a case.