8655 pts ยท January 9, 2013
What's the deal honey buns? Yall like poptarts?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2TO5atI4rU
and in the past female superhero movies haven't made them money.
All I'm saying is that the film industry goes with what it knowns. It isn't a visceral issue for them, only monetary, (1/2)
The film industry is going with tried and true these days (sequels, revamps). Starting with an unclear character is unsettling.
fans, and in those two groups their heroines are well known.
to her origins, and making a film off of that is hard. Addressing your other remarks comic companies market to children and comic 3/?
magical amazon princess with unclear powers. Her backstory seems to be a little hazy, and thus there is no right or wrong answer 2/?
From what I have heard Wonder Woman was originally intended as an axis fighting feminist symbol, who evolved into a 1/?
may not be the right choice for a fem superhero film. A Black Widow film would probably be more successful (audiences are more familiar).
Meaning making a high budget film about her an uphill battle. Secondly the film industry only takes winning bets, so IMO Wonder Woman 2/3
Firstly, Wonder Woman is well known as a character, but her actual abilities and origins are not known by mainstream America. 1/2
I am just playing devils advocate. Why is that not fair (I actually want to know your thinking behind that comment)?
To be fair Wonder Woman's backstory is not as well known as other big names like Batman, and also historically female super hero films flop.
*proceeds to rent van*
Thanks friend.
black and white is over simplification. (done)
for them? My point is the line between equal chance and result is impossibly thin, and to present the issue as (3/many)
below the rim? Is equality giving everyone equal training prior to dunking? What if someone can't jump, should the task be changed (2/many)
This is dangerous thinking, because what is equality? If the task is dunking a basket ball, is equality having everyone start 4ft (1/many)
KEEP IT GREEN BOYS!!!
TO THE MOON!!!
*tips
I see we have another intellectual in our midst! *tips
I see you are a unintelligent (probably religious) man. You probably haven't puffed a blunt in your life.
Edit: thanks for the gold!
Test post please ignore is the most upvoted thing in reddit history.
A tried and true karma collection method.
Can't a nigga test a post?
Please ignore
You guys didn't ignore it, fuck you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2TO5atI4rU
and in the past female superhero movies haven't made them money.
All I'm saying is that the film industry goes with what it knowns. It isn't a visceral issue for them, only monetary, (1/2)
The film industry is going with tried and true these days (sequels, revamps). Starting with an unclear character is unsettling.
fans, and in those two groups their heroines are well known.
to her origins, and making a film off of that is hard. Addressing your other remarks comic companies market to children and comic 3/?
magical amazon princess with unclear powers. Her backstory seems to be a little hazy, and thus there is no right or wrong answer 2/?
From what I have heard Wonder Woman was originally intended as an axis fighting feminist symbol, who evolved into a 1/?
may not be the right choice for a fem superhero film. A Black Widow film would probably be more successful (audiences are more familiar).
Meaning making a high budget film about her an uphill battle. Secondly the film industry only takes winning bets, so IMO Wonder Woman 2/3
Firstly, Wonder Woman is well known as a character, but her actual abilities and origins are not known by mainstream America. 1/2
I am just playing devils advocate. Why is that not fair (I actually want to know your thinking behind that comment)?
To be fair Wonder Woman's backstory is not as well known as other big names like Batman, and also historically female super hero films flop.
*proceeds to rent van*
Thanks friend.
black and white is over simplification. (done)
for them? My point is the line between equal chance and result is impossibly thin, and to present the issue as (3/many)
below the rim? Is equality giving everyone equal training prior to dunking? What if someone can't jump, should the task be changed (2/many)
This is dangerous thinking, because what is equality? If the task is dunking a basket ball, is equality having everyone start 4ft (1/many)
KEEP IT GREEN BOYS!!!
TO THE MOON!!!
*tips
I see we have another intellectual in our midst! *tips
I see you are a unintelligent (probably religious) man. You probably haven't puffed a blunt in your life.
Edit: thanks for the gold!
Test post please ignore is the most upvoted thing in reddit history.
A tried and true karma collection method.
Can't a nigga test a post?
Please ignore
You guys didn't ignore it, fuck you.