601 pts ยท May 19, 2019
< densely populated areas is a surefire way to ensure you have no country in a generation or two.
Cities cannot feed themselves. To discount the needs of the people who grow the food we all have to eat just because they aren't living in >
It isn't the truth. You're offering them a comforting lie, and I find that to be worse than a more difficult truth. The scientific research>
Because you and I clearly disagree on what "helps" means. I think people who want to cut off their own limbs feel better if they do it, but>
What did you hate him for? Be real, all I knew him for was playing a jerk on TV but actually giving a bunch to charities and being in Home>
That just isn't true. It's like saying humans don't need vitamin D to survive.
Support non-Chinese business wherever possible and urge your representatives to support sanctions/trade action against China!
< lamps and way too small of cages) as prizes for carnivals and such. Support legitimate businesses for all reptiles!
Also in addition to China, there are still places in the US where animals can be sold in horrible conditions (like turtles with no heat >
So "Black Culture" is...
"Science" does. Your politics don't.
Trump was popular before the news said he had to be hated.
Shhhhh we don't ask that around here.
Shhhhh,Trump bad
Where have you been my dude? I'm still here
< scientific community at large agree that this is better for their health and safety.
< people I have interacted with (though none with these specific genetic illnesses) that have similar situations have agreed and the >
< species then, even though there were many genetic and visual differences. I find this to be a similar situation. We should use the facts>
< black people as a different species, rather than simply a different looking human. It would have been unscientific to create a new >
But if they're capable of breeding their the same species. Not to get political again, but I'm referencing people who wanted to classify >
< situation like this
< target, treating them as a sick person means people who wish to do them harm are attacking someone who is sick. Optics are important in a>
< gender for these people risks their safety more than accepting them as an unwell person. Isolating them in their own gender makes them a >
And I'm not one of them, and no one else in the medical community that I've ever worked with is, to my knowledge. I think creating a third >
Unless I'm missing your point, your link even acknowledges that its something that DID happen but is becoming uncommon.
< densely populated areas is a surefire way to ensure you have no country in a generation or two.
Cities cannot feed themselves. To discount the needs of the people who grow the food we all have to eat just because they aren't living in >
It isn't the truth. You're offering them a comforting lie, and I find that to be worse than a more difficult truth. The scientific research>
Because you and I clearly disagree on what "helps" means. I think people who want to cut off their own limbs feel better if they do it, but>
What did you hate him for? Be real, all I knew him for was playing a jerk on TV but actually giving a bunch to charities and being in Home>
That just isn't true. It's like saying humans don't need vitamin D to survive.
Support non-Chinese business wherever possible and urge your representatives to support sanctions/trade action against China!
< lamps and way too small of cages) as prizes for carnivals and such. Support legitimate businesses for all reptiles!
Also in addition to China, there are still places in the US where animals can be sold in horrible conditions (like turtles with no heat >
So "Black Culture" is...
"Science" does. Your politics don't.
Trump was popular before the news said he had to be hated.
Shhhhh we don't ask that around here.
Shhhhh,Trump bad
Where have you been my dude? I'm still here
< scientific community at large agree that this is better for their health and safety.
< people I have interacted with (though none with these specific genetic illnesses) that have similar situations have agreed and the >
< species then, even though there were many genetic and visual differences. I find this to be a similar situation. We should use the facts>
< black people as a different species, rather than simply a different looking human. It would have been unscientific to create a new >
But if they're capable of breeding their the same species. Not to get political again, but I'm referencing people who wanted to classify >
< situation like this
< target, treating them as a sick person means people who wish to do them harm are attacking someone who is sick. Optics are important in a>
< gender for these people risks their safety more than accepting them as an unwell person. Isolating them in their own gender makes them a >
And I'm not one of them, and no one else in the medical community that I've ever worked with is, to my knowledge. I think creating a third >
Unless I'm missing your point, your link even acknowledges that its something that DID happen but is becoming uncommon.