2169 pts ยท June 1, 2012
no doubt it seems that way to you as someone stupid or crazy. possibly both.
maybe after you get your fourth & fifth, you'll understand what inflation is, and see the need to prove when higher prices are gouging
then you should be capable of drawing a line - LOL
no, that didn't occur to me because i'm not stupid or crazy :)
how do you believe this? did corporations just suddenly get greedy when they'd been generous beforehand? it's obviously inflation.
provide evidence
source for that 70% figure? ngl, sounds like BS
because you're not crazy
When the money and audience were his, he stopped caring about principles and said stuff he previously said was racist to say.
Now it's not NFL but NBA and he's saying that a general manager shouldn't upset the audience with controversial views.
Telling athletes to play the game and not upset the audience with controversial views was supposedly racist when Ingraham proposed it.
When it was anthem protest, Lebron said it's matter of principle for athletes to advocate what they believe in - despite loss of viewership.
No. That isn't being fair because when she was criticizing the NFL protest she represented the views of a plurality of American consumers.
carlin hated conservatives - way to only focus on half of what he was
china is source of cash for nba, so lebron chastised the manager saying that he should stick to basketball and not talk politics
an nba general manager tweeted support for hong kong protest against china
lebron called her racist because he supported the athletes doing the anthem protest
she's a political commentator who said athletes have no better reason for telling us all about their political views than plumbers
'act or instance of placing two elements close together or side by side' - such as the 'K and KY
they've got a chance to be great and you have no right to take that away. that's what it means.
from the prolife POV it's about whether to sentence someone to death based on your predictions of what might happen.
the point is that you can't know and therefore you can't justify killing the kid as preventing him/her from having a bad life.
you miss the point of the einstein thing if you're viewing it as a calculation of probabilities for positive/negative outcomes.
have a great impact means that you give them a chance and can't decide to end them based on your assumption/prediction.
if you assume that we're talking about another human being (which, i suppose you don't if you're pro-choice) then saying someone could
pro-choice people don't get the point of the einstein thing.
it's pretty close. MLK and landza are the ends of the bell curve. there's more thann2 to 1 odds of being in the normal middle range.
it suggests that the 'christian' angle is just people making dumb assumptions
agreed- unless headless constrictors can squeeze people to death - seems implausible tho'
actually even that's less important than surface area - hence our convolutions
no doubt it seems that way to you as someone stupid or crazy. possibly both.
maybe after you get your fourth & fifth, you'll understand what inflation is, and see the need to prove when higher prices are gouging
then you should be capable of drawing a line - LOL
no, that didn't occur to me because i'm not stupid or crazy :)
how do you believe this? did corporations just suddenly get greedy when they'd been generous beforehand? it's obviously inflation.
provide evidence
source for that 70% figure? ngl, sounds like BS
because you're not crazy
When the money and audience were his, he stopped caring about principles and said stuff he previously said was racist to say.
Now it's not NFL but NBA and he's saying that a general manager shouldn't upset the audience with controversial views.
Telling athletes to play the game and not upset the audience with controversial views was supposedly racist when Ingraham proposed it.
When it was anthem protest, Lebron said it's matter of principle for athletes to advocate what they believe in - despite loss of viewership.
No. That isn't being fair because when she was criticizing the NFL protest she represented the views of a plurality of American consumers.
carlin hated conservatives - way to only focus on half of what he was
china is source of cash for nba, so lebron chastised the manager saying that he should stick to basketball and not talk politics
an nba general manager tweeted support for hong kong protest against china
lebron called her racist because he supported the athletes doing the anthem protest
she's a political commentator who said athletes have no better reason for telling us all about their political views than plumbers
'act or instance of placing two elements close together or side by side' - such as the 'K and KY
they've got a chance to be great and you have no right to take that away. that's what it means.
from the prolife POV it's about whether to sentence someone to death based on your predictions of what might happen.
the point is that you can't know and therefore you can't justify killing the kid as preventing him/her from having a bad life.
you miss the point of the einstein thing if you're viewing it as a calculation of probabilities for positive/negative outcomes.
have a great impact means that you give them a chance and can't decide to end them based on your assumption/prediction.
if you assume that we're talking about another human being (which, i suppose you don't if you're pro-choice) then saying someone could
pro-choice people don't get the point of the einstein thing.
it's pretty close. MLK and landza are the ends of the bell curve. there's more thann2 to 1 odds of being in the normal middle range.
it suggests that the 'christian' angle is just people making dumb assumptions
agreed- unless headless constrictors can squeeze people to death - seems implausible tho'
actually even that's less important than surface area - hence our convolutions