newAccountOnlyOnePurpose

1731 pts ยท January 23, 2021


the speed of sound decreases with altitude. At the average flight altitude it's 660mph

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Mitsubishi is a good example. The other two are much more expensive

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Maybe. In Santa Barbara you would get about that many sand crabs if you did this. Different kind of crab, but it shows it's plausible.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

actually same goes for having a modest number of beers at the public park in many cities

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

my god the people on Imgur are soft. I swear if you see any single body part being used you go "how is it not breaking??"

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 9

It might just be that this is old, but the range is way too big in California

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yeah haha this was about an hour

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Nope-at least not in CA. Is it possible you're thinking of the annual service provided by a manufacturer for a few years on new cars?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

I meant flt (faster than light travel)

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the people on the spaceship could arrive much faster than 1200 years. Only the people on earth have to wait 2400 years to hear what they saw

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

you can't assume that something will be figured out someday when most believe it's fundamentally impossible

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

what are you saying? It's just the temperature being the temperature at which water is liquid at reasonable atmospheric pressures

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

hubble has mirrors not lenses

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and we have no cameras with apertures big enough to focus on an exoplanet

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

*we have no photos at all. An exoplanet has never been close to big enough to occupy more than one pixel on a camera

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

1200 years on earth. The astronauts would know right away in their reference frame.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's not obvious whether this scaling benefits smaller stars. Bigger/brighter stars have more dangerous outbursts, but you would be farther

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

-imgur users when they see people do anything outside or with any element of physicality

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

doesn't happen between different spatial directions (your x velocity doesnt somehow determine your y velocity)

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

third your rate of change in time from my perspective is influenced by your rate of change in the spatial directions, but this effect

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

second the universe has a beginning in time and increases in entropy with time but not in any of the spatial directiosn

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

we can differentiate between time and space directions in whether or not two events with a given separation are causally linked.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

but if A happens at (0,0,0,0) and B happens at (1,0,0,0), then A cannot affect/cause B

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

First - if one event happens at (x=0,y=0,z=0,t=0) and another happens at (0,0,0,1), the first event can causally affect the second

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Okay well I gave the mathematical distinction, but I'll list some physical differences that this leads to

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn't say it wasn't a dimension. I was replying to "space and time are the same thing"

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yeah good example

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But now you've handled it exceptionally well. All good dawg. Have a great day.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

no but you should know yours, and when someone points out an aspect you've never heard of, you should know whether to debate or to research

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0