374 pts ยท February 23, 2012
It's an issue. It's nothing like as bad as Chernobyl, and we've irradiated plenty of ocean water before; y'know, with nuclear bomb testing?
Fukushima radiation release: 300PBq. Chernobyl radiation release: ~5600PBq. Do the math.
False. http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2015/07/07/what-about-nuclear-power-isnt-good/
You never had any privacy anyway, a good PI will find out everything about you. Now you have anonymity, which is better. CIA ain't look @ u.
Some slightly less fearmongering info from a reputable source: http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/chernobyl/20110423_FAQs_Chernobyl.pdf
Unsourced, inaccurate, misleading, and misrepresenting. That's what this post is.
I don't know about you, but I know I'd prefer "maybe 4000" over 30+ years to 7 million a year.
And more than 7 million people die a year thanks to fossil fuels http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/air-pollution/en/
Lack of knowledge about danger and willingness to take precautions does not equal actual danger.
Scary because at the time nobody knew what the ramifications would be. Now we know you would have been totally fine.
Fukushima has been unfairly over-categorized. It's not comparable.
Please quit spreading pointless FUD like this horseshit. We need nuclear power, and we need it yesterday, or we're going to choke the Earth.
If something goes wrong with a CANDU/ACANDU/Liquid metal reactor, the laws of physics don't work anymore. We have bigger problems.
Modern reactor designs are thermodynamically incapable of Chernobyl/Three-Mile/Fukushima-style accidents.
Nuclear power remains the safest and only guaranteed viable zero-carbon method of power production.
Millions of people die each year due to radiation release from coal plants, accidents in coal mines, all kinds of other shit.
Also http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/chernobyl/Chernobyl-update.pdf
Direct link to info PDFs: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43447/1/9241594179_eng.pdf
Chernobyl was a disaster but deaths directly attributable to it are in the hundreds, at most.
Some sources: WHO page on Chernobyl http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/chernobyl/en/ Short version: No statistically significant change.
This is all fucking horseshit.
It got good just around episode 8/9. Too much exposition and set-up. Just as it got cancelled it got REALLY good :(
trolling.
the big bang theory is literally nerd blackface
sauce: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0OwMShNbsY
but will they bless this post
WHO GIVES A FUCKING SHIT IF IT'S FAKE YOU PETULANT CUNTS
i need this
.
it's because it's tidally locked. same side always faces the sun. just like our moon
It's an issue. It's nothing like as bad as Chernobyl, and we've irradiated plenty of ocean water before; y'know, with nuclear bomb testing?
Fukushima radiation release: 300PBq. Chernobyl radiation release: ~5600PBq. Do the math.
False. http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2015/07/07/what-about-nuclear-power-isnt-good/
You never had any privacy anyway, a good PI will find out everything about you. Now you have anonymity, which is better. CIA ain't look @ u.
Some slightly less fearmongering info from a reputable source: http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/chernobyl/20110423_FAQs_Chernobyl.pdf
Unsourced, inaccurate, misleading, and misrepresenting. That's what this post is.
I don't know about you, but I know I'd prefer "maybe 4000" over 30+ years to 7 million a year.
And more than 7 million people die a year thanks to fossil fuels http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/air-pollution/en/
Lack of knowledge about danger and willingness to take precautions does not equal actual danger.
Scary because at the time nobody knew what the ramifications would be. Now we know you would have been totally fine.
Fukushima has been unfairly over-categorized. It's not comparable.
Please quit spreading pointless FUD like this horseshit. We need nuclear power, and we need it yesterday, or we're going to choke the Earth.
If something goes wrong with a CANDU/ACANDU/Liquid metal reactor, the laws of physics don't work anymore. We have bigger problems.
Modern reactor designs are thermodynamically incapable of Chernobyl/Three-Mile/Fukushima-style accidents.
Nuclear power remains the safest and only guaranteed viable zero-carbon method of power production.
Millions of people die each year due to radiation release from coal plants, accidents in coal mines, all kinds of other shit.
Also http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/chernobyl/Chernobyl-update.pdf
Direct link to info PDFs: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43447/1/9241594179_eng.pdf
Chernobyl was a disaster but deaths directly attributable to it are in the hundreds, at most.
Some sources: WHO page on Chernobyl http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/chernobyl/en/ Short version: No statistically significant change.
This is all fucking horseshit.
It got good just around episode 8/9. Too much exposition and set-up. Just as it got cancelled it got REALLY good :(
trolling.
the big bang theory is literally nerd blackface
sauce: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0OwMShNbsY
but will they bless this post
WHO GIVES A FUCKING SHIT IF IT'S FAKE YOU PETULANT CUNTS
i need this
.
it's because it's tidally locked. same side always faces the sun. just like our moon