518 pts · April 3, 2016
Only first gen anticholinergic ones
This really is not the point of face masks
The reason they don't cut everything but try to manipulate it open is because it tends to heal better that way. You won't feel it.
You're not addressing what I said. You can't find a black and a white person that look alike and have anatomically similar faces.
Because white, black and Asian people don't look the same
You suggested the image could be correct which is similarly nonsensical.
But could you have typical examples look identical? No. ?
You don't think the image is wrong, even though it factually is?
Though I will concede that a single skull may be classified as one or another ancestry depending on method or assessor.
Bro this is forensic odontology and nothing to do with cranial morphological or morphometric methods?
If I make a collage of lesbians that look like Bieber and a picture of Bieber, that does not mean it's an accurate representation of reality
Find me a classically looking Asian, Black and Caucasoid individual and their skulls won't look the same.
I think you're making a very conflated point. People of different sexes or ancestries can look similar visually. So can their skulls.
Could you not use scm and mastoid process for example to support a sex assessment?
You can't just copy paste random papers and make a good argument. The method in that paper is not an industry standard.
Yes this makes complete sense developmentally, until puberty we are essentially the same. You are correct
I didn't quote you and I didn't downvote to feel good about myself so who is coming out with the falsehoods here
It is not within the realm of possibility for different ancestries to have identical skulls.
Theoretically a female could be so androgynous so as to pass for a male, this does not mean you cannot tell males and females apart.
Not to mention for the purposes of a graphic like this, surely it would make sense to use stereotypes or classical examples.
But the reality is that it doesn't as it uses the same images, and it is in fact inaccurate.
You also didn't address my systematic review in any meaningful way.
I don't understand what you're arguing. Assessing sex and ancestry from skulls is reliable enough to be useful. If you disagree you're wrong
Yes
The reality is that the certainty is high enough for the assessment to add value to investigations and the court.
You have muscle attachments on the skull you can use though
You said you can't sex a skull or assess ancestry with any certainty, whereas that's not what the up to date literature suggests. ?♂️
I have a degree in forensic anthropology so am happy to chat bro
Can always count on my main man Ubelaker. The consensus among experts is that valuable info can be obtained through assessing skulls.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20961790.2019.1697060?scroll=top&needAccess=true
Only first gen anticholinergic ones
This really is not the point of face masks
The reason they don't cut everything but try to manipulate it open is because it tends to heal better that way. You won't feel it.
You're not addressing what I said. You can't find a black and a white person that look alike and have anatomically similar faces.
Because white, black and Asian people don't look the same
You suggested the image could be correct which is similarly nonsensical.
But could you have typical examples look identical? No. ?
You don't think the image is wrong, even though it factually is?
Though I will concede that a single skull may be classified as one or another ancestry depending on method or assessor.
Bro this is forensic odontology and nothing to do with cranial morphological or morphometric methods?
If I make a collage of lesbians that look like Bieber and a picture of Bieber, that does not mean it's an accurate representation of reality
Find me a classically looking Asian, Black and Caucasoid individual and their skulls won't look the same.
I think you're making a very conflated point. People of different sexes or ancestries can look similar visually. So can their skulls.
Could you not use scm and mastoid process for example to support a sex assessment?
You can't just copy paste random papers and make a good argument. The method in that paper is not an industry standard.
Yes this makes complete sense developmentally, until puberty we are essentially the same. You are correct
I didn't quote you and I didn't downvote to feel good about myself so who is coming out with the falsehoods here
It is not within the realm of possibility for different ancestries to have identical skulls.
Theoretically a female could be so androgynous so as to pass for a male, this does not mean you cannot tell males and females apart.
Not to mention for the purposes of a graphic like this, surely it would make sense to use stereotypes or classical examples.
But the reality is that it doesn't as it uses the same images, and it is in fact inaccurate.
You also didn't address my systematic review in any meaningful way.
I don't understand what you're arguing. Assessing sex and ancestry from skulls is reliable enough to be useful. If you disagree you're wrong
Yes
The reality is that the certainty is high enough for the assessment to add value to investigations and the court.
You have muscle attachments on the skull you can use though
You said you can't sex a skull or assess ancestry with any certainty, whereas that's not what the up to date literature suggests. ?♂️
I have a degree in forensic anthropology so am happy to chat bro
Can always count on my main man Ubelaker. The consensus among experts is that valuable info can be obtained through assessing skulls.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20961790.2019.1697060?scroll=top&needAccess=true