1475 pts · April 10, 2015
But that alone doesn’t make a terrorist group. The radicalisation of them and others was more due to Pakistan and the Soviets.
only part of the story. Taliban means student. They were the refugees of the soviet war and most of the initial funding was from ISI
Nah only partly. Mostly Gorbachev’s total war doctrine and the nativisation of Pakistan’s ISI’s lower levels. It’s complex.
Do you not watch the news? This has been airing all over for like two weeks
Great post op but your writing style is so round about it’s annoying me how you barely get to the point.
What could they possibly cross check with your social in the first place? It stinks.
And he saw it coming from miles away and couldn’t do shit. ER was wild with just enough restraint to be believable. Greys A ain’t shit.
Uh no. It doesn’t make it okay either though so....
Oh come on! Racists always reveal themselves. Who cares who participated in their enslavement? Your agenda is now clear.
Do they? Why?
Huh? Who? What’s the point of this? Are you ok?
So many assumptions. I’m 38. Why do you persist? All this for me? Or are you still virtue signalling? It’s a holocaust post for ducks sake!
My god get off it. Despite all efforts you’ve managed to lay out your manifesto forgetting entirely what my original point was.
Ok thanks.
Um yes. I’ve seen enough. That’s not your determination to make. Thank you, have a good day.
What? Ok buddy. Again thank you for your time.
Huh? Ok.. I think I’ve got what I wanted to know from this exchange. All the best then.
Balance of payments. Uyy vey. Let’s just leave this eh. I don’t think you have the perquisite knowledge to be talking about this w authority
Wow, get your head out of American politics. Sounds like Fox News talking points. This doesn’t apply in any academic sense. Bad faith args
Evidently your reading comprehension isn’t quite there. Keep doubling down. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism
Yeah but to deal free market forces are insufficient to deal with bop issues and deliberate currency or stock manipulation:
Yeah I said EVEN Adam Smith. That should have been your first clue. These aren’t big words. High school level.
On examination you’re advocating doing nothing against market manipulation by foreign powers... that would be fascist too I suppose.
Adam Smith is 101. Fronting about pre Keynesian, pre supply side, neoclassical, monetarist... I mean really?
Yes I’m aware. I brought it up dummy.
Your problem is also assuming acknowledging planned aspects means your against market forces. It’s a balance. Otherwise forget the fire dept
Smiths is words on laissez faire break down when you consider negative externalities. This is a basic basic principle. Google that now.
But that alone doesn’t make a terrorist group. The radicalisation of them and others was more due to Pakistan and the Soviets.
only part of the story. Taliban means student. They were the refugees of the soviet war and most of the initial funding was from ISI
Nah only partly. Mostly Gorbachev’s total war doctrine and the nativisation of Pakistan’s ISI’s lower levels. It’s complex.
Do you not watch the news? This has been airing all over for like two weeks
Great post op but your writing style is so round about it’s annoying me how you barely get to the point.
What could they possibly cross check with your social in the first place? It stinks.
And he saw it coming from miles away and couldn’t do shit. ER was wild with just enough restraint to be believable. Greys A ain’t shit.
Uh no. It doesn’t make it okay either though so....
Oh come on! Racists always reveal themselves. Who cares who participated in their enslavement? Your agenda is now clear.
Do they? Why?
Huh? Who? What’s the point of this? Are you ok?
So many assumptions. I’m 38. Why do you persist? All this for me? Or are you still virtue signalling? It’s a holocaust post for ducks sake!
My god get off it. Despite all efforts you’ve managed to lay out your manifesto forgetting entirely what my original point was.
Ok thanks.
Um yes. I’ve seen enough. That’s not your determination to make. Thank you, have a good day.
What? Ok buddy. Again thank you for your time.
Huh? Ok.. I think I’ve got what I wanted to know from this exchange. All the best then.
Balance of payments. Uyy vey. Let’s just leave this eh. I don’t think you have the perquisite knowledge to be talking about this w authority
Wow, get your head out of American politics. Sounds like Fox News talking points. This doesn’t apply in any academic sense. Bad faith args
Evidently your reading comprehension isn’t quite there. Keep doubling down. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism
Yeah but to deal free market forces are insufficient to deal with bop issues and deliberate currency or stock manipulation:
Yeah I said EVEN Adam Smith. That should have been your first clue. These aren’t big words. High school level.
On examination you’re advocating doing nothing against market manipulation by foreign powers... that would be fascist too I suppose.
Adam Smith is 101. Fronting about pre Keynesian, pre supply side, neoclassical, monetarist... I mean really?
Yes I’m aware. I brought it up dummy.
Your problem is also assuming acknowledging planned aspects means your against market forces. It’s a balance. Otherwise forget the fire dept
Smiths is words on laissez faire break down when you consider negative externalities. This is a basic basic principle. Google that now.