graygrif

5399 pts · November 8, 2015


That may be possible in the Senate, in the House they have to use their ID cards to vote.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Assuming he has some sort of LLC and he hasn't pierced the corporate veil by doing things such as commingling money.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Commonwealth instead of state. The other 3 are Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. Kentucky uses the term since they split from VA.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Functionally there is no difference between a commonwealth. It’s a term inherited from the colonial era. There are 4 states who use the term

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

speaking at a Special Olympics event because the organization has close ties to the Kennedy Family, since a Kennedy sister started it.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean, most Republican politicians aren't fond of the Special Olympics anyway. Surgeon General Carmona (under W. Bush) was discouraged from

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

William, William's 3 kids, and Harry dies, it goes to Harry's 2 children in order of birth. Andrew has little to no chance of being king.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

> it would go to William's 3 kids in order of birth. If Charles, William, and William's 3 children die, it goes to Harry. If Charles, >>

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

If by a car crash you mean three car crashes, sure. If Charles were to die, the crown would go to William. If Charles & William dies, >

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Your original comment was that "HR serves management" So use my scenario, using whoever you considered "management" in your original comment

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thus why I said its an example of surviorship bias, no one "complains" that HR did what it was supposed to do. So we only see the bad cases.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So, if someone in management sexually harassing an employee, who should HR tell to knock it off? Management or the employee?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

that you don't hear about the companies with HR that put a stop to this shit because no one listens to praises of an HR that did its job.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

or couldn't have known. If the employee can prove the company knew or should have known, the company becomes liable. The main issue is >

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

For example, a company should want to get rid of a sexual harasser because they only get one "get out of free card" if they didn't know >

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

This saying needs to die. It relies upon survivorship bias and fails to take into account that HR's goals can align with the employee's. >

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

One of the things they have to teach is how to balance a checkbook. I can tell you the first question on that lesson. "What's a check?"

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which is better, take your time to make sure you have them dead to rights or go to court on some flimsy evidence and they get off?

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Many times these minimum qualifications read about the same as "turtles all the way down" GS-11 -> 1 yr @ GS-10, GS-10 -> 1 year @ GS-9, etc

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Minimum Qualifications: One year in a GS-11 position. Who the hell knows what that is because they don't give "real world" equivalents

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, most of the Georgia Supreme Court was appointed by Republican governors. The only majority Dem "office" is their US Senators. 2/2

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In what world is Georgia a blue state? The Governor, state Senate, state House, the majority of the US House delegation are all Rep. 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

While there are some egregious examples, to most people "Pork" is just another term for "money spent in some other district than my own."

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0