feengineer

145 pts · September 14, 2017


You haven’t said anything to refute the fact that identity politics directly stifles democracy.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

There is no meaningful difference between the two

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

There should be no consequence for either. That’s why identity politics stifles democracy. That is a plain fact.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

That’s why you’re still here.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

That means you are okay with violence against gay people because they can just “keep it secret”

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

No he didn’t. What the fuck are you talking about?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Not in an actual democratic election. Try again bitch.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You can call him whatever you want and I can call you out for being a whiny child.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You are most certainly my bitch.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The thread is about America. It’s not my fault you’re too retarded to have the reading comprehension to grasp that.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

That is why you’re an obvious troll.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

If someone experiences trauma or harm because of who they are or who they believe, you cannot argue that they can be who they want.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

How do you feel about gay people who are harassed and beaten for being gay? Per your logic that’s just the danger in coming out, right?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Both. Both are arbitrary.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

So you can’t explain how. Got it. You’re just a mindless sheep.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Okay you’re a troll. Got it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

He’s the first president in US history to openly support LGBT rights before being elected. Not even Obama did that.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You’re making some pretty ridiculous claims. Let’s see your proof that he is racist, sexist, etc.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

So you have no possible way to argue that he is a tyrant.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yes it is. You just don’t like that it is. But this is a pointless tangent. Trump is subject to checks and balances.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The illusion of democracy is not actual democracy.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

None subject to checks and balances. And most not elected democratically. Try again.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Your pathetic emotional whine has no basis in fact. So from the start you are wrong.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

What argument? I don’t need an argument. The fact that you are a whiny child with shit logic is observable facts.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

What relevance does that have to anything?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

What argument? All I’m doing is showing that you’re a whiny child with shit logic. This isn’t a debate.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Yeah I know what cussing is. You have the delicate sensibilities of a five year old. Maybe the internet isn’t the place for you.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Calling him a tyrant means you think it isn’t fair that he is president. This is elementary logic.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

No it isn’t. If there is no truth in it it isn’t hyperbole. No one gives a shit how you feel about him.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Your opinion has nothing to do with anything. Calling him a tyrant is a lie. Its a gross exaggeration because you have the maturity of a kid

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2