People suck. They care more about punishing those they hate than helping the people they love. They rather let innocent people suffer as long as the "bad guys" get hurt. The right brought the bar so low that we give the left a pass because they are not as bad.
other people on scene, even if they can place Alford there, they don't have evidence that he shot and not the other people.
And the Hertz receipt didn't exonerate him. There was still time but it severely restricts everything. And since witnesses said there were
i fucking hate all of you and i hope everybody dies.
told the cop that she suspected Alford. Alford's girlfriend's son claimed he overheard Alford admitting to the crime multiple time.
No. You came here with your bias and you ignored everything. I hope the earth explodes and kill everyfuckingbody. Also the victim's mother
finger Alford? Was I wrong in saying the prosecutor had Alford's phone pinging the tower near the crime scene then traveled toward Hertz?
wrong in saying the SUV belong to Alford's livein girlfriend? Was I was I wrong in saying another witness claimed the cop bribed him to
Fuck you and your bias. What do you mean "none of that is actually true?" Was I wrong in saying that the first witness was too high? Was I
...that's 3 years ahead of schedule. You need to take care of yourself a little better.
It's a business. People up top look at viewership to determine whether dir, casting agent, cameramen, sfx team, etc will have another job.
$426 mil a year?
The magic number is $75k/yr ($425mil/yr if you're in the SF Bay area) http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2019628,00.html
My friend was an aspiring actress. Think below Hallmark movies. She said people get hired base on the number of followers they have.
Wait, you guys are having parties during the pandemic?
https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/casedetail.aspx?caseid=5904
It's one of those things where both sides are unreliable. https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/casedetail.aspx?caseid=5904
Because we have to rebuke him. He has platform. Ignoring him only allows him to build up his base.
possible that Alford was the killer. But there is no proof considering there were multiple people at the scene (drug deal gone bad). 3/3
him to do it. And prosecutor had Alford's phone pinging cell tower near crime scene then traveled north toward Hertz. So it's still 2/
Witnesses fingered him. 1 did after seeing his photo on tv (probably was influenced). 1 was a police informant who later said cops bribed 1/
https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/casedetail.aspx?caseid=5904
There was multiple people involved so even if he was there, there was no proof that he was the killer, 4/
said cop bribed him to finger Alford. Prosecutors said Alford's phone pings cell tower near the crime scene then traveled toward Hertz 3/
Alford's bf. 1 witness was high on coke. Another witness ID'ed Alford after seeing his photo on tv. Another witness (police informant) 2/
TL/DR: Innocent until proven guilty. He's innocent because there is not enough proof. Hertz definitely screwed up. Car involved belong to 1/
Hertz. Prosecutors gave up because, while it was possible, they couldn't prove it. Therefore innocent until proven guilty 4/4
police informant, who later said the cop bribed them to finger this guy. There was enough time for him to commit the murder and drove to 3/
to his bf, whom he lives with. His phone pinged the cell tower along the way between the crime scene and Hertz. Other witness was a 2/
Ummm...there was a lot of things the could go either way. A witness put him at the scene (witness was high on coke). SUV involved belong 1/