eilonwy

7146 pts · September 3, 2011


cover this kind of situation. (This is assuming severe abuse & a victim who sees no way to escape except by killing their abuser.) 3/3

3 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 7

doesn't count as self-defense because the abuser wasn't attacking you at that moment. Basically, self-dense rules need to expand to 2/

3 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 7

The right to self-defense is limited to immediately threatening situations. Killing your abuser while they're asleep, for instance, 1/

3 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 9

I guess they're saying Antifa = Jews, & "looking Jewish" apparently means being a white guy disliked by Magas (Yehudi = Jewish)

3 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

So you think the best way to deal with the library invasion was to start a shootout?

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

I think the title is meant to be a joke about how filthy it is.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Christians who are shitty & authoritarian

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

White, healthy newborns who "look normal."

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

7 when parental rights are terminated, & isn't taken in by relatives, will be in foster care & group homes (orphanages) until they turn 18.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

People looking to adopt are also picky about adopting a group of bio siblings: they usually want two kids of the same gender. A kid who's 6/

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

non-relatives) drops off by a lot, and keeps decreasing. A child who's 7 years or older has practically no chance of adoption. 5/

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

be adopted) if they're healthy and look "normal." It helps if they're white, too. When a baby hits 6 months, its adoptability (by 4/

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

hospital holds at birth — a fraction of the number of babies detained by social services. And the babies are only "adoptable" (likely to 3/

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Btw once a baby is born, it becomes less "adoptable" every second that goes by. The babies you're talking about are mostly taken from 2/

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Are you talking about the US? Because aside from healthy, white newborns being likely to get adopted, you are egregiously wrong.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This isn't a worst case scenario. It's already happening in the US. "Pro life" doctors have been doing this for decades.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

bills. And all of it could have been avoided if the doctors were allowed to remove the non-viable fetus when the woman got to the hospital.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

pregnancy. The woman may well die anyway, and if she doesn't, her health will be impacted for a long time. Not to mention the hospital 2/

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Woman's life in danger" means the woman is actually dying. Doctors wait until the woman is actually dying, & then they can terminate the 1/

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Catholic Church is against IVF & a lot of Christians freak out about IVF waste.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pro white lives. The fake anthrax attack cited Virginia Dare, who is an icon to American white supremacists.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

meat, meaning it's preserved with salt. 2/2

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

#35 Quality ham is a big piece of pig's leg, not meat scraps glued together. But ham is always processed, by definition: it's a cured 1/

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's specifically Catholic: the Immaculate Conception (Mary had her original sin removed at the moment her parents conceived her)

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

There's a panel where nipples, drawn as 2 dots, are visible on a shirtless mouse-woman. The context isn't sexual, and iirc she's dead.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's what Trump & his dad did

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Plus it has the same salty-sweet combo as the cheese & tomato sauce

3 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

There's some extremely cringy episodes, but the best episodes are amazing.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So which humans should we test on instead? You know, before we have any idea if those humans will be safe?

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1