94996 pts ยท April 6, 2016
Go back to then.
At a certain age this arrangement becomes win-win.
They're not barred from taking a stance on issues but they're not supposed to endorse candidates, so in this case yes.
Ameowdeus
Property is theft. Theft is stealing other people's property. Therefore, property is stealing other people's theft.
You can solve both problems at once, you know
"I wonder if there will be politics in the comments?" I asked myself.
Wrong leveeeeeeeeerrrrr!!!
Another excellent example of labels being cheap
Antifa isn't anti-fascist any more than Citizens United is about uniting citizens. Labels are cheap, especially when they're self-ascribed.
Some people who find this post by its tags are going to be very disappointed
Unfortunately, fighting racism with racism (e.g. critical race theory, The 1619 Project) is slowly being codified.
Especially since this is probably using the new modern "everyone right of Mao" definition of "nazi" instead of referring to actual nazis.
Really selling me on the viability of cryptocurrency here...
"My 'unpopular' opinion is that everyone who disagrees with me is a stupid psychopath. Surely no one else feels the same."
Lmao she also wasn't wearing a mask, and it's on video. https://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/status/1348999785525735424?s=20
What mask? She wasn't wearing one either! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJBOyZZTnig
This. It'll only be "boring" because the media will cheerfully look away from anything "interesting" and write about the first pets instead.
The post is literally calling for his arrest, presumably in direct connection with these events. My question is on what charge?
Lol of course you only have something to say about the smallest offense by far
You don't get much more anti-BLM than the 1994 Crime Bill
Yes. Pro segregation, the 1994 Crime Bill, "poor kids are just as bright as white kids," etc.
His username is accurate, you know.
So what law did he break?
Let's take your statement at face value. Where's the criminal complicity in today's events, admissible in a court of law?
But he condemned the violence. And Twitter deleted it.
I don't condone him shoehorning in a jab about election fraud but the fact remains that he condemned the violence, and Twitter deleted it.
Which was the inciting part, the part where he told the rioters to stop or the part where he told them to go home?
Well, you probably didn't see it. Because, you know, Twitter deleted it.
Yeah, I saw, he condemned the violence and then Twitter deleted it.
Go back to then.
At a certain age this arrangement becomes win-win.
They're not barred from taking a stance on issues but they're not supposed to endorse candidates, so in this case yes.
Ameowdeus
Property is theft. Theft is stealing other people's property. Therefore, property is stealing other people's theft.
You can solve both problems at once, you know
"I wonder if there will be politics in the comments?" I asked myself.
Another excellent example of labels being cheap
Antifa isn't anti-fascist any more than Citizens United is about uniting citizens. Labels are cheap, especially when they're self-ascribed.
Some people who find this post by its tags are going to be very disappointed
Unfortunately, fighting racism with racism (e.g. critical race theory, The 1619 Project) is slowly being codified.
Especially since this is probably using the new modern "everyone right of Mao" definition of "nazi" instead of referring to actual nazis.
Really selling me on the viability of cryptocurrency here...
"My 'unpopular' opinion is that everyone who disagrees with me is a stupid psychopath. Surely no one else feels the same."
Lmao she also wasn't wearing a mask, and it's on video. https://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/status/1348999785525735424?s=20
What mask? She wasn't wearing one either! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJBOyZZTnig
This. It'll only be "boring" because the media will cheerfully look away from anything "interesting" and write about the first pets instead.
The post is literally calling for his arrest, presumably in direct connection with these events. My question is on what charge?
Lol of course you only have something to say about the smallest offense by far
You don't get much more anti-BLM than the 1994 Crime Bill
Yes. Pro segregation, the 1994 Crime Bill, "poor kids are just as bright as white kids," etc.
His username is accurate, you know.
So what law did he break?
Let's take your statement at face value. Where's the criminal complicity in today's events, admissible in a court of law?
But he condemned the violence. And Twitter deleted it.
I don't condone him shoehorning in a jab about election fraud but the fact remains that he condemned the violence, and Twitter deleted it.
Which was the inciting part, the part where he told the rioters to stop or the part where he told them to go home?
Well, you probably didn't see it. Because, you know, Twitter deleted it.
Yeah, I saw, he condemned the violence and then Twitter deleted it.