digasisv

1935 pts · June 30, 2017


No, Obamacare took it. Last time I look, that was the democrats baby, not the top Supreme Court.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It was the democrats that took it. So why should I vote for them?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Promote a more body autonomy view. Till then vote for the party that hasn’t sacrificed my family’s health.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No, pointing out the hypocrisy. Just because I do something or if it is right doesn’t give me a right to force it on others.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Sorry to break your bubble with reality, but I am fully vaccinated and push for people to be vaccinated.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Subjective. When it’s your rights and choices they are after the. They don’t look vastly better.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Don’t really have that choice on the ballot. Neither major party wants body autonomy.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Their body, their choice. It is dumb for sure. But let them take the risk. I for one am atgatt and actively push for it.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Asking others to give up something to give you want you want rarely works. If we really cared we would start thinking of others.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

How about add them and actually go after the real problem?

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

As they carry the real spy equipment in their pockets.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I will take half of that. Only fair.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Good move, now can we make it legal federally?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

So wrong. Even though my kids would have laughter or punched them, I would not be happy about this either.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

And not subject to someone else’s view on what they need.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or in other words while their pay would be different, their buying power (what they get) would be the same.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The list would be the same for everyone, what it would result in determining pay would change via area.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Roughly the same.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

List is just to make sure we get the same items on the local level. While two people in two areas get paid differently, what they get is

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rent, food shopping list, utils, internet, cell, and x% based on the former for other stuff. Idea is to get as objective as possible.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thus if you base it of an objective list it will get you the equivalent cost of living from place to place.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Sure you can. Base it on an objective list of things (rent, food, …)

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

So is not supporting the rights and choices of those you want to have support you.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am too lazy to wait in line for an escalator. I am sometimes to lazy to wait for an elevator. So I take the stairs.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I agree, if we can think of others and stop the infighting that money isn’t as powerful.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

These are going to the same location.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I lived here my entire life and they still get me sometimes. Ninjas day job is a gas attendant.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Laws shouldn’t be made on any belief. Should only be there if proven to be needed and implemented with everyone in mind.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0