1963 pts ยท March 15, 2023
THE NUMBER OF ARRESTS DO NOT EQUAL THE NUMBER OF CROSSINGS!! WE CANNOT KNOW THE NUMBER OF CROSSINGS!!!Really sick and fucking tired of this kind of "fact-checking".
Isn't it funny that you managed to misrepresent things... almost like you're trying to demonise someone.Or, you're just repeating what you've been told by others and haven't bothered to see if they were lying to you.Either way, you're spreading lies.
In other words, you're intentionally lying about what you've said, what anyone else has said, and why you were asking your original question.Translation: You're a dishonest fuck. Good luck with that.
Your original comment"Why are people hating this? It's bad that the social security agency either doesn't know how old 10s of millions of people are or think 10+ millions of people are over the world record age of 122."That's you assuming Elon was correct about what the field meant. It's not you asking anyone IF it was correct. You didn't want to trust anyone, and you've constantly argued that any info we gave you CANNOT be trusted.
So you admit you didn't even fucking try to find anything out... and just jumped straight to assuming that he was accurate.Notice you've just continued with the sealioning. You're either a Musk Fanboi trying to justify his lies, or you're a troll.Either way, you're a waste of oxygen. Have fun.
In other words, you didn't bother doing any checking up to see whether what he said could be correct or not, and just assumed he was correct... which is why you asked why he was getting hate. (yeah, you assumed he was right and wondered why he was getting hate for what he said)Sorry, but you're not fooling anyone with your rather unsubtle attempt at Sealioning.Go back to sucking Elon off, I'm sure he'll notice you and be thankful.
He's having to ignore publicly available info, stuff that has been out there for a long time, stuff that doesn't mean a fucking thing with regard to if people are getting money... and he's trying to claim it means there's a huge amount of fraud.So, to answer your original question again... he's getting hate for it because it's all lies on his part, and the only people who are falling for it are ignorant fuckwits, or those who want to suck him off.Which are you?
No... it isn't... because the SS Agency automatically stops payments at 115 years old anyway. The death field is just one of the ways they work out if it's a valid SSN to pay out to.Worse (for you) is the fact that the numbers he mentioned have been publically available for DECADES... and that the number of people over 100 who receive SS isn't even over 100k.WHICH IS THE NUMBER OF CONFIRMED ALIVE PEOPLE OVER 100YO!
Yes, and you've done the same... Mr. "It's not how I would do it"AND YOU STILL IGNORE THE ENTIRE POINT WHICH IS THAT MUSK LIED ABOUT HOW IT MEANS PEOPLE ARE THAT OLD AND GETTING PAID!!Gonna keep on ignoring that and instead trying to quibble about something that is quite literally irrelevant? Gotta get that last inch down so you can tongue the ballsack, right?
Extermination camps were run by Adults, therefore Adults are bad...And I already know your only possible argument against it... "Not All Adults Ran The Camps!!"And not all fucking Lawyers wrote Project 2025, so go fuck your stupid shitty argument.
It's a saving for Present Day US, the cost is paid by Future US. Future US is not the same as Present Day US, therefore US will never have to pay the cost of all the savings.... is literally the fucking logic behind it.
One more thing... you're trying to distract from the fact that Musk directly claimed that all those with that field marked "false" were collecting SS.He is 100% fucking wrong about that, and that is why he's getting hate, to answer the original question you asked.But don't worry, you're deflections to try to bury that have been noted. Hope you don't get his pubes stuck in your throat.
As the SS agency requires a death certificate to confirm someone's death, without that cert, the entry will be "false".Anything else is irrational in the extreme, and I'm sorry to say, the way you'd set it up is flawed and that is why they REQUIRE THE FUCKING CONFIRMATION BEFORE THEY MARK SOMEONE AS DEAD.You're working so hard to support Musk that nothing you say to the contrary means shit. Stop sucking him off.
Drop you're fucking assumption, and stop being a twat.Or, you can keep on assuming they're going to use a method that doesn't require confirmation (WHICH THEY FUCKING DO, ASSHOLE) and does nothing but cause more issues.Your choice
The fact you assume that's how it is, is your problem.Here's the thing... if you mark someone as dead without confirmation, you have a lot of problems. One of which is you end up with people who are alive, but your database insists is dead, and they can't prove they are alive. That is why it's done the way it's done.Just because you'd do it a way that would cause that very problem, and has caused those problems before? That doesn't mean shit.
Someone's bored...
In other words, you complete numpty, not only is that exactly what the "death=false" thing about, but it's also wonderful evidence that Musky is LYING HIS FUCKING HEAD OFF...And you seem to be trying to gargle his balls. Dunno why, he's not going to fuck you. (sexually... he's going to really fuck you in other ways)
Anyone who has had to inform any bureaucracy of a person's death knows full well that you need to give confirmation that the person is dead to have them marked as dead in their database... if they are not confirmed dead, then the Death field is marked False.Note that it doesn't mean that person will continue to be paid... there are other fields that are used to denote that status. Something that those who work in said agencies have already made fucking clear!
Because the Death field is for those who are confirmed dead (as in, a copy of the death cert has been sent in) rather than confirmed alive.What it isn't is the number of people alive and getting SS... that is a different field in the table.So, why are people hating on Musk saying that all the people there are getting SS? BECAUSE HE'S A FUCKING IDIOT, OR BECAUSE HE IS OUTRIGHT FUCKING LYING... and dumb fucks will just believe what he's said without thinking about it... like you seem to do.
Not really... there's nothing in the Bible that says anything bad about owning slaves.Nothing in the OT is against slavery (unless it's the Jews being enslaved by non-Jews, otherwise it's perfectly bloody fine!) and the closest you could get in the NT is something about "love thy neighbour as thyself", which is a fucking stretch and a half.That last one would get any other book banned.
You mean like the way the article diminishes that very same problem when it's a woman suffering it?"Of course, men get the ick too. But these rarely carry the same viral weight, nor do they seem to hold the same power to humiliate and undermine confidence."The article makes it clear that it's giving far more weight to the effect it's having on men, rather than the effect it has on everyone.
No-one should be the main character in their own story, because Real Life isn't a freaking story... and that's what Main Character Syndrome is, someone thinking that their life is a story, to the point that they're seeing other people as just NPCs rather than actual people. Or insisting that everything that happens only happens because THEY exist. Or that they deserve special treatment because THEY ARE THE MAIN CHARACTER!
I don't know why anyone cares what the Advisor to President Musk says....
Check page 3 for what the Judge in the case thinks, by the way... https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.543790/gov.uscourts.nysd.543790.200.0.pdf
The fact you used the term "battery" when the way the law in question was written means that forcibly shoving a finger into someone's vagina is classed as "battery" is just an attempt to minimise what was actually done, whether that is what you intended or not. (your citation points out that it was sexual abuse, as a subset of battery)The only reason it wasn't rape is because the law defines it as "unwanted penetration by a penis"... might want to keep that in mind before you "well akctually"
"Trump is just putting in people who won't prevent him from breaking laws"Just fixed that for you
THE NUMBER OF ARRESTS DO NOT EQUAL THE NUMBER OF CROSSINGS!! WE CANNOT KNOW THE NUMBER OF CROSSINGS!!!
Really sick and fucking tired of this kind of "fact-checking".
Isn't it funny that you managed to misrepresent things... almost like you're trying to demonise someone.
Or, you're just repeating what you've been told by others and haven't bothered to see if they were lying to you.
Either way, you're spreading lies.
In other words, you're intentionally lying about what you've said, what anyone else has said, and why you were asking your original question.
Translation: You're a dishonest fuck. Good luck with that.
Your original comment
"Why are people hating this? It's bad that the social security agency either doesn't know how old 10s of millions of people are or think 10+ millions of people are over the world record age of 122."
That's you assuming Elon was correct about what the field meant. It's not you asking anyone IF it was correct. You didn't want to trust anyone, and you've constantly argued that any info we gave you CANNOT be trusted.
So you admit you didn't even fucking try to find anything out... and just jumped straight to assuming that he was accurate.
Notice you've just continued with the sealioning. You're either a Musk Fanboi trying to justify his lies, or you're a troll.
Either way, you're a waste of oxygen. Have fun.
In other words, you didn't bother doing any checking up to see whether what he said could be correct or not, and just assumed he was correct... which is why you asked why he was getting hate. (yeah, you assumed he was right and wondered why he was getting hate for what he said)
Sorry, but you're not fooling anyone with your rather unsubtle attempt at Sealioning.
Go back to sucking Elon off, I'm sure he'll notice you and be thankful.
He's having to ignore publicly available info, stuff that has been out there for a long time, stuff that doesn't mean a fucking thing with regard to if people are getting money... and he's trying to claim it means there's a huge amount of fraud.
So, to answer your original question again... he's getting hate for it because it's all lies on his part, and the only people who are falling for it are ignorant fuckwits, or those who want to suck him off.
Which are you?
No... it isn't... because the SS Agency automatically stops payments at 115 years old anyway. The death field is just one of the ways they work out if it's a valid SSN to pay out to.
Worse (for you) is the fact that the numbers he mentioned have been publically available for DECADES... and that the number of people over 100 who receive SS isn't even over 100k.
WHICH IS THE NUMBER OF CONFIRMED ALIVE PEOPLE OVER 100YO!
Yes, and you've done the same... Mr. "It's not how I would do it"
AND YOU STILL IGNORE THE ENTIRE POINT WHICH IS THAT MUSK LIED ABOUT HOW IT MEANS PEOPLE ARE THAT OLD AND GETTING PAID!!
Gonna keep on ignoring that and instead trying to quibble about something that is quite literally irrelevant? Gotta get that last inch down so you can tongue the ballsack, right?
Extermination camps were run by Adults, therefore Adults are bad...
And I already know your only possible argument against it... "Not All Adults Ran The Camps!!"
And not all fucking Lawyers wrote Project 2025, so go fuck your stupid shitty argument.
It's a saving for Present Day US, the cost is paid by Future US. Future US is not the same as Present Day US, therefore US will never have to pay the cost of all the savings.
... is literally the fucking logic behind it.
One more thing... you're trying to distract from the fact that Musk directly claimed that all those with that field marked "false" were collecting SS.
He is 100% fucking wrong about that, and that is why he's getting hate, to answer the original question you asked.
But don't worry, you're deflections to try to bury that have been noted. Hope you don't get his pubes stuck in your throat.
As the SS agency requires a death certificate to confirm someone's death, without that cert, the entry will be "false".
Anything else is irrational in the extreme, and I'm sorry to say, the way you'd set it up is flawed and that is why they REQUIRE THE FUCKING CONFIRMATION BEFORE THEY MARK SOMEONE AS DEAD.
You're working so hard to support Musk that nothing you say to the contrary means shit. Stop sucking him off.
Drop you're fucking assumption, and stop being a twat.
Or, you can keep on assuming they're going to use a method that doesn't require confirmation (WHICH THEY FUCKING DO, ASSHOLE) and does nothing but cause more issues.
Your choice
The fact you assume that's how it is, is your problem.
Here's the thing... if you mark someone as dead without confirmation, you have a lot of problems. One of which is you end up with people who are alive, but your database insists is dead, and they can't prove they are alive. That is why it's done the way it's done.
Just because you'd do it a way that would cause that very problem, and has caused those problems before? That doesn't mean shit.
Someone's bored...
In other words, you complete numpty, not only is that exactly what the "death=false" thing about, but it's also wonderful evidence that Musky is LYING HIS FUCKING HEAD OFF...
And you seem to be trying to gargle his balls. Dunno why, he's not going to fuck you. (sexually... he's going to really fuck you in other ways)
Anyone who has had to inform any bureaucracy of a person's death knows full well that you need to give confirmation that the person is dead to have them marked as dead in their database... if they are not confirmed dead, then the Death field is marked False.
Note that it doesn't mean that person will continue to be paid... there are other fields that are used to denote that status. Something that those who work in said agencies have already made fucking clear!
Because the Death field is for those who are confirmed dead (as in, a copy of the death cert has been sent in) rather than confirmed alive.
What it isn't is the number of people alive and getting SS... that is a different field in the table.
So, why are people hating on Musk saying that all the people there are getting SS? BECAUSE HE'S A FUCKING IDIOT, OR BECAUSE HE IS OUTRIGHT FUCKING LYING... and dumb fucks will just believe what he's said without thinking about it... like you seem to do.
Not really... there's nothing in the Bible that says anything bad about owning slaves.
Nothing in the OT is against slavery (unless it's the Jews being enslaved by non-Jews, otherwise it's perfectly bloody fine!) and the closest you could get in the NT is something about "love thy neighbour as thyself", which is a fucking stretch and a half.
That last one would get any other book banned.
You mean like the way the article diminishes that very same problem when it's a woman suffering it?
"Of course, men get the ick too. But these rarely carry the same viral weight, nor do they seem to hold the same power to humiliate and undermine confidence."
The article makes it clear that it's giving far more weight to the effect it's having on men, rather than the effect it has on everyone.
No-one should be the main character in their own story, because Real Life isn't a freaking story... and that's what Main Character Syndrome is, someone thinking that their life is a story, to the point that they're seeing other people as just NPCs rather than actual people. Or insisting that everything that happens only happens because THEY exist. Or that they deserve special treatment because THEY ARE THE MAIN CHARACTER!
I don't know why anyone cares what the Advisor to President Musk says....
Check page 3 for what the Judge in the case thinks, by the way... https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.543790/gov.uscourts.nysd.543790.200.0.pdf
The fact you used the term "battery" when the way the law in question was written means that forcibly shoving a finger into someone's vagina is classed as "battery" is just an attempt to minimise what was actually done, whether that is what you intended or not. (your citation points out that it was sexual abuse, as a subset of battery)
The only reason it wasn't rape is because the law defines it as "unwanted penetration by a penis"... might want to keep that in mind before you "well akctually"
"Trump is just putting in people who won't prevent him from breaking laws"
Just fixed that for you